Zeiss RESIGHT Disposable Lenses Evaluation Study (RESIGHT)

July 18, 2023 updated by: Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Zeiss RESIGHT Disposable Lenses Evaluation Study: Investigator-initiated, Mono-center, Academic, Prospective, Interventional Case Study

To evaluate the intra-operative efficacy of a new intra-operative viewing device.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is designed to obtain more information on the efficacy of the disposable RESIGHT lenses in routine vitrectomy surgery. This information can lead to adjustments to these surgical lenses to further fine tune a device which can be used by other surgeons.

Theoretically, both the improved lens design and better resistance to fogging should improve the visualization of the retina hence facilitate the surgery, increasing the surgical safety.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Vlaams-Brabant
      • Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium, 3000

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Voluntary written informed consent of the participant or their legally authorized representative has been obtained prior to any screening procedures
  • Patients that are scheduled for primary vitrectomy surgery to treat retinal detachment or macular disease (pucker, macular hole, vitreomacular traction).
  • Both vitrectomy-only and combined phaco-vitrectomy surgeries
  • General or local anesthesia, or combination

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who do not have sufficient command of the Dutch language to read and understand the informed consent form
  • Any disorder, which in the investigator's opinion might jeopardise participant's safety or compliance with the CIP.
  • Repeat vitrectomy surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: group 1
primary vitrectomy surgery for retinal detachment
a comparison will be done between the present lenses used (reusable RESIGHT lenses and disposable Vitreq contact lens) and the new disposable RESIGHT lenses.
Active Comparator: group 2
macular surgery: pucker, vitreomacular traction or macular hole
a comparison will be done between the present lenses used (reusable RESIGHT lenses and disposable Vitreq contact lens) and the new disposable RESIGHT lenses.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ultra Wide Field lens View Angle evaluation
Time Frame: during surgery
Ultra Wide Field lens View Angle: scale from 1 (far more indentation) to 5 (far less indentation)
during surgery
Ultra Wide Field lens Condensation evaluation
Time Frame: during surgery
Ultra Wide Field lens Condensation: scale from 1 (far more condensation) to 5 (far less condensation)
during surgery
Wide Angle lens Condensation evaluation
Time Frame: during surgery
Wide Angle lens Condensation: scale from 1 (far more condensation ) to 5 (far less condensation)
during surgery
Illumination appearance evaluation
Time Frame: during surgery
Illumination intensity required during the surgery : scale from 1 (significantly higher) to 5 (significantly lower)
during surgery
Color appearance evaluation
Time Frame: during surgery
color appearance during the surgery : scale from 1 (far less natural colors) to 5 (far better natural colors )
during surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peter Stalmans, PhD, MD, UZ Leuven

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 11, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • S67415

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Retinal Detachment

Clinical Trials on ZEISS disposable

3
Subscribe