Clinical Utility and Gait Analysis of NextAR System AUS

May 31, 2023 updated by: Medacta International SA

Does Personalized Soft Tissue Balance Data Improve Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Medially Stabilized Knee Arthroplasty? A Prospective, Randomized Study Investigating the Clinical Utility of the NextAR Navigation System (NextAR).

This study titled "Does Personalised Soft Tissue Balance Data Improve Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Medially Stabilised Arthroplasty? A Prospective, Randomised Study Investigating the Clinical Utility of the NextAR navigation system (NextAR)" is a randomised, single blinded, prospective cohort study with the primary aim determine the clinical utility of the NextAR system data in providing soft tissue balance patterns to enable prosthesis implants to resemble more native knee alignment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study titled "Does Personalised Soft Tissue Balance Data Improve Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Medially Stabilised Arthroplasty? A Prospective, Randomised Study Investigating the Clinical Utility of the NextAR navigation system (NextAR)" is a randomised, single blinded, prospective cohort study with the primary aim determine the clinical utility of the NextAR system data in providing soft tissue balance patterns to enable prosthesis implants to resemble more native knee alignment.

The aims of this study are:

  • To determine the clinical utility of the NextAR system data in providing soft tissue balance patterns to enable prosthesis implants to resemble more native knee alignment
  • To determine whether NextAR system data contributes to improving patient outcomes and knee kinematics following TKR surgery, by providing greater flexion range that is equivalent to native knee motion.
  • To assess clinical outcomes measured by standardised assessments, including radiographic evidence, the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and European Quality of Life Five Dimensions - Five Levels (EQ5D-5L) questionnaires.
  • Determining the kinematics of the replaced knee as measured by 3D gait analysis.

According to study protocol, clinical evaluation is performed preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1, and 2 years with the use of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and European Quality of Life Five Dimensions - Five Levels (EQ5D-5L).

CT scan is performed preoperatively and at 6-weeks after surgery, while X-ray assessment is performed at baseline and at the 1-year follow up.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Fremantle, Australia
        • Recruiting
        • Fremantle Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Ben Jeffcote

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The trial will include two groups of 50 patients in each group. This is based on a power calculation assuming a difference in Forgotten Join Score of greater than 5 points. This calculation allows for a loss to follow-up of 10%. The study will conclude once the patients involved have completed 2 years of follow-up.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • End-stage osteoarthritis of the knee suitable for total knee arthroplasty.
  • Aged over 18 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unsuitable for TKR due to chronic infection, medical disease, inability to consent, inability to attend for post-operative follow-up, significant psychiatric issues, substance abuse issues
  • Previous reconstructive/fracture/arthroplasty surgery on affected knee
  • Active inflammation arthropathy
  • Significant extra articular deformity
  • Morbidly Obese (BMI >40)
  • Pregnant women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
control study
patients will be operated with conventional instrumentation
Implantation of GMK Sphere with conventional instrumentation (control group)
NextAR study
patients will be operated using the NextAR guidance system
Implantation of GMK Sphere using the NextAR guidance system (NextAR group)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determine whether NextAR system data contributes to change patient outcomes using the Forgotten Joint Score
Time Frame: pre-op, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years

To determine whether NextAR system data contributes to change patient outcomes using the Forgotten Joint Score

- Forgotten Joint Score measures the patient's ability to forget about the joint as a result of successful treatment and is based on the premise that the best arthroplasty is one the patient forgets. This score goes from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100 points.

pre-op, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To determine whether NextAR system data contributes to change patient outcomes using the EQ5D-5L
Time Frame: pre-op, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years

To determine whether NextAR system data contributes to change patient outcomes using the EQ5D-5L

The EQ5D-5L comprises of 6 questions survey that measures generic health-related quality of life. This score goes from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 1 points.

pre-op, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
Determining the kinematics of the replaced knee as measured by 3D gait analysis.
Time Frame: pre-op, 1 year
The purpose of the gait analysis will be to assess the variation in kinematics between the patients replaced knee (in both study groups) compared to normal knee kinematic data reported in the literature. The hypothesis being tested is that alteration of component position to give more normal ligament tension, will more resemble normal knee kinematics. (n=20) will be sufficient to conduct the gait analysis. These patients will be selected from the overall cohort for enrolment at 12 months post-surgery and matched for age, gender, BMI and osteoarthritis pattern. The comparison will involve comparing the average kinematic data values obtained in group 1 (NextAR data provided at surgery) vs the reported values in the literature and the same analysis will be repeated for patients in group 2 (NextAR data not provided at surgery).comparison will be made between the two groups in terms of which more closely replicates the kinematics of the non-arthritic knee
pre-op, 1 year
To determine whether NextAR system data contributes to change patient outcomes using the Oxford Knee Score
Time Frame: pre-op, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years

To determine whether NextAR system data contributes to change patient outcomes using the Oxford Knee Score

the Oxford Knee Score is a questionnaire that has been specifically developed to assess knee function and pain. It is short, reproducible and extensively referenced in orthopaedic literature, making it a preferred tool for studies. This score goes from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 48 points.

pre-op, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
To determine whether NextAR system data contributes to change patient outcomes using the Forgotten Joint Score using the International Knee Documentation Committee
Time Frame: pre-op, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years

To determine whether NextAR system data contributes to change patient outcomes using the Forgotten Joint Score using the International Knee Documentation Committee

International Knee Documentation Committee is questionnaire that evaluates physical activity, level of pain and knee functionality in sporting activities. This score goes from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100 points.

pre-op, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ben Jeffcote, Fremantle Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P02.022.01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Total Knee Arthroplasty

Clinical Trials on Implantation of GMK Sphere with conventional instrumentation

3
Subscribe