- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05863897
e-COGRAT: A Blended eHealth Intervention for Fatigue Following Acquired Brain Injury
Fatigue is a common, persistent consequence of acquired brain injury (ABI). Research into treatments that may alleviate post-ABI fatigue is been limited. Pharmacological treatment (methylphenidate) has shown the greatest scientific effects, but is complicated because the risk of adverse side effects and its potential for abuse. COGRAT, an evidence-based treatment combining cognitive therapy (CO) with graded activity training (GRAT), is found to be effective in treating fatigue in patients with acquired brain injury. However, therapist guided internet-based CBT (I-CBT) could offer a more accessible and cheaper alternative to this highly frequent face to face treatment. Moreover, I-CBT is found to be effective in a population with patients with psychiatric and chronic somatic disorders, including chronic fatigue syndrome. Recent studies suggests that I-CBT is effective for people with ABI as well. To obtain optimal benefit from both group delivered face to face therapy and e-health and to combine the available evidence of COGRAT and I-CBT in patients with ABI, we developed a blended e-health cognitive behavioral (group)intervention; e-COGRAT.
The goal of this intervention study is to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of e-COGRAT to treat fatigue in people with ABI. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is a blended eHealth cognitive behavioral (group)intervention (e-COGRAT) effective as a treatment for fatigue in people with ABI?
- Is e-COGRAT the blended care variant of COGRAT, a cognitive behavioral group treatment for fatigue afer ABI, comparable to COGRAT in terms of efficacy?
- Will participants of e-COGRAT improve significant on overall fatigue, emotional well-being and participation?
- Will it be feasible for at least 80% of the participants to complete the intervention completely?
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Michelle Bertelkamp, MSc
- Phone Number: +31 88 9208374
- Email: m.bertelkamp@heliomare.nl
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Marthe F. Ford, Dr.
- Phone Number: +31 88 9208130
- Email: m.ford@heliomare.nl
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- An ABI diagnosis (stroke and traumatic brain injury) in the chronic phase (≥6 months after injury)
- Complaints of severe fatigue (Checklist Individual Strength - subscale Fatigue score ≥ 40)
- Full comprehension of Dutch language
- Being cognitive capable of using the internet and having regular internet access.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having severe cognitive deficits (Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS) < borderline)
- Having major untreated or unstable medical or psychiatric comorbidities (eg, epilepsy, psychosis)
- Patients with (complaints of) depression are excluded if the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is > 10
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Daily fatigue
Time Frame: 1 year (daily in baseline and intervention phase and daily in the last week of follow-up)
|
Primary outcome is the change in severity of fatigue complaints on a daily visual analogue scale (VAS) ("How would you rate your fatigue today?") which will be registered by text messages.
Participants can indicate the severity of the experienced fatigue by given themselves a grade between 0 - 4. 0: "I'm not tired"; 1: "I'm a little bit tired"; 2: "tired"; 3: "pretty tired"; "; 4: "seriously tired".
These grades will also be used in the intervention.
|
1 year (daily in baseline and intervention phase and daily in the last week of follow-up)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Fatigue after ABI
Time Frame: 1 year (once in baseline, treatment and follow-up)
|
Fatigue after ABI will be assessed with the Dutch Multifactor Fatigue Scale (DMFS).
The DMFS measures 5 aspects of fatigue regarding the four weeks preceding the assessment: Impact of fatigue, Mental fatigue, Signs and Direct consequences of fatigue, Physical fatigue and Coping with fatigue.
The DMFS contains 38 items.
Questions are answered on a 5-point Likert scale.
Subscales of the DMFS showed sufficient to good reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.70 to 0.91), good convergent validity with an existing fatigue scale, and good divergent validity with measures of mood and self-esteem.
|
1 year (once in baseline, treatment and follow-up)
|
Fatigue in the general population
Time Frame: 1 year (once in baseline, treatment and follow-up)
|
Fatigue in the general population will be assessed with the Checklist Individual Strength - subscale Fatigue (CIS-f).
The CIS-f contains 8 questions on fatigue severity regarding the two weeks preceding the assessment.
The CIS-f has good reliability and is sensitive to change.
Questions are answered on a 7-point Likert scale (1-7, higher scores represent higher fatigue).
|
1 year (once in baseline, treatment and follow-up)
|
Emotional distress
Time Frame: 1 year (once in baseline, treatment and follow-up)
|
Depression and anxiety symptoms of the last week will be assessed with the Dutch version of the 14-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
The reliability of the HADS is good (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.71 to 0.90) as is the test-retest reliability (0.86-0.90) (Spinhoven et al., 1997).
Questions are answered on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3): 7 items on the depression subscale (HADS-D) and 7 items of the anxiety subscale (HADS-A).
Subscale sumscores are categorized as normal (0-7), mild (8-10), moderate (11-14) or severe (15-21).
|
1 year (once in baseline, treatment and follow-up)
|
Level of participation
Time Frame: 1 year (once in baseline, treatment and follow-up)
|
The Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation - Participation (USER-P) is a questionnaire to rate objective and subjective participation after rehabilitation.
Internal consistency is satisfactory (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.70-0.91).
|
1 year (once in baseline, treatment and follow-up)
|
Feasibility of the overall online intervention
Time Frame: 1 year (once in treatment and follow-up)
|
Feasibility will be assessed with structured interviews about overall usability, experienced benefits and difficulties and level of involvement.
These interviews, for both participants and therapists, will take place posttreatment and after follow up.
|
1 year (once in treatment and follow-up)
|
Feasibility of each specific online session
Time Frame: 1 year (weekly during treatment and after follow-up)
|
After each online session both patients and therapists fill in a questionnaire with questions about their experiences with the specific session concerning usability, content, lay out, potential technical difficulties and other assorted comments.
|
1 year (weekly during treatment and after follow-up)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Aglaia M. Zedlitz, Dr., Leiden University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Spinhoven P, Ormel J, Sloekers PP, Kempen GI, Speckens AE, Van Hemert AM. A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects. Psychol Med. 1997 Mar;27(2):363-70. doi: 10.1017/s0033291796004382.
- Carlbring P, Andersson G, Cuijpers P, Riper H, Hedman-Lagerlof E. Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Cogn Behav Ther. 2018 Jan;47(1):1-18. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2017.1401115. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
- Zedlitz AM, Rietveld TC, Geurts AC, Fasotti L. Cognitive and graded activity training can alleviate persistent fatigue after stroke: a randomized, controlled trial. Stroke. 2012 Apr;43(4):1046-51. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.632117. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
- Visser-Keizer AC, Hogenkamp A, Westerhof-Evers HJ, Egberink IJ, Spikman JM. Dutch multifactor fatigue scale: a new scale to measure the different aspects of fatigue after acquired brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Jun;96(6):1056-63. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.12.010. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
- van der Zee CH, Priesterbach AR, van der Dussen L, Kap A, Schepers VP, Visser-Meily JM, Post MW. Reproducibility of three self-report participation measures: The ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener, the Participation Scale, and the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation. J Rehabil Med. 2010 Sep;42(8):752-7. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0589.
- Ali A, Morfin J, Mills J, Pasipanodya EC, Maas YJ, Huang E, Dirlikov B, Englander J, Zedlitz A. Fatigue After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022 Jul-Aug 01;37(4):E249-E257. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000710. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
- Ford ME, Geurtsen GJ, Groet E, Rambaran Mishre RD, Van Bennekom CAM, Van Someren EJW. A blended eHealth intervention for insomnia following acquired brain injury: a randomised controlled trial. J Sleep Res. 2023 Feb;32(1):e13629. doi: 10.1111/jsr.13629. Epub 2022 May 31.
- Theadom A, Barker-Collo S, Jones K, Dudley M, Vincent N, Feigin V. A pilot randomized controlled trial of on-line interventions to improve sleep quality in adults after mild or moderate traumatic brain injury. Clin Rehabil. 2018 May;32(5):619-629. doi: 10.1177/0269215517736671. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
- van Beugen S, Ferwerda M, Hoeve D, Rovers MM, Spillekom-van Koulil S, van Middendorp H, Evers AW. Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for patients with chronic somatic conditions: a meta-analytic review. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Mar 27;16(3):e88. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2777.
- Janse A, Worm-Smeitink M, Bleijenberg G, Donders R, Knoop H. Efficacy of web-based cognitive-behavioural therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;212(2):112-118. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2017.22.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- e-COGRAT
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Fatigue
-
Bakulev Scientific Center of Cardiovascular SurgeryFoundation for the Support of Physical Culture and Sports BECOME A CHAMPION; Autonomous Non-Profit organization of additional education sports school BECOME A CHAMPIONNot yet recruitingEfficacy, Self | Fatigue, Mental | Fatigue; Muscle, Heart | Fatigue; CombatRussian Federation
-
Universita di VeronaUniversity of Southern CaliforniaCompletedDiet, Healthy | Fasting | Fatigue, Mental | Fatigue; Muscle, HeartItaly
-
University of ZurichRecruitingVocal FatigueSwitzerland
-
KU LeuvenCompleted
-
Société des Produits Nestlé (SPN)Maastricht University Medical CenterCompleted
-
University of Applied Sciences for Health Professions...University of Wisconsin, MilwaukeeCompleted
-
Taoyuan General HospitalCompleted
-
Alaa Yousri Mahmoud AtiaUnknownMuscle FatigueEgypt
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandLaboratoire des Adaptations Métaboliques à l'Exercice en conditions Physiologiques...CompletedNeuromuscular FatigueFrance
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceUniversity of Lorraine; Institut National de Recherche et de Sécurité, Nancy...Unknown
Clinical Trials on e-COGRAT (a blended eHealth intervention)
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfection, Human Immunodeficiency Virus
-
ARCIM Institute Academic Research in Complementary...CompletedBurnout | Work-Related StressGermany
-
Plethora Solutions LtdBio-Kinetic Europe, Ltd.; Omnicare Clinical ResearchCompleted
-
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SwedenKarolinska University Hospital; Skane University Hospital; Karlstad Central Hospital and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingIntermittent ClaudicationSweden
-
University of California, San FranciscoPatient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteCompletedUnsafe Sex | Unprotected SexUnited States
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...Completed
-
Fred Hutchinson Cancer CenterBreast Cancer Research FoundationCompletedAnatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatomic Stage IA Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatomic Stage IB Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatomic Stage IIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatomic Stage IIB Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatomic Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatomic... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Centers for Disease Control and PreventionInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh; Ministry... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Hospices Civils de LyonCompleted
-
HK inno.N CorporationUnknownHand, Foot and Mouth DiseaseKorea, Republic of