Perceptual Consequences of Cochlear Implant Electrode-neuron Interfaces

March 12, 2024 updated by: Julie G. Arenberg, CCC-A, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary

Development and Assessment of Listener-tailored Programming for Cochlear Implant Listeners

Despite the success of cochlear implants, devices surgically placed in the inner ears of patients with severe hearing loss, there remains substantial variability in the overall speech perception outcomes for the children and adults who receive them. The main goals of this project are: i) to improve our understanding of how cochlear implants affect the developing auditory system, ii) apply that knowledge to test new methods for programming children and adults, and iii) to study how long it takes listeners to adapt to new cochlear implant programs over the short- and long-term. The results will improve our understanding of how the deafened auditory system develops with cochlear implant stimulation and advance clinical practice to improve hearing outcomes in cochlear implant listeners.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Recruiting
        • Mass Eye and Ear
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Julie Arenberg
      • Waltham, Massachusetts, United States, 02453

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Research Subjects with a Cochlear Implant ADULTS Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult at least 18 years old
  • Native speakers of American English
  • Wears a cochlear implant manufactured by Advanced Bionics (Clarion Hi-Focus I or newer), Cochlear, or MED-EL

CHILDREN Inclusion Criteria

  • Children at least 6 months old
  • Native speakers of American English
  • Wears a cochlear implant manufactured by Advanced Bionics (Clarion Hi-Focus I or newer), Cochlear, or MED-EL

    • For both children and adults with a cochlear implant, some study criteria might pertain to a subset of subjects, such as a specific age at which the subjects developed a hearing loss, or was implanted.

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion for all Cochlear Implant Subjects:

  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Does not meet the inclusion criteria for a specific study protocol, such as age of onset of hearing loss, age of cochlear implantation, duration of deafness, number of active electrodes in the cochlear implant device
  • Unable to carry out the study protocol or tasks required in the study

Exclusion for all Normal Hearing Subjects:

  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Hearing loss, or significant history of hearing related issues
  • Unable to carry out the study protocol or tasks required in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention to assess CI
To develop new programming strategies for individuals that will improve performance for a wider range of cochlear implant people
Subjects will be asked to complete this one-page cognitive test assesses short-term memory recall and attention. This test takes approximately 10 minutes.
Subjects will be asked to listen for the softest sound they can hear ("threshold') with different electrode configurations
Subjects will be asked to determine the difference between different types of sounds, such as those that vary in pitch and/or volume. Sometimes they will be asked to judge the sound quality of sounds that have very small differences, or make loudness judgments and comparisons.
Subjects will be asked to listen to words and sentences in quiet and/or in the presence of background noise. For this task they will be asked to repeat the words or sentences following its presentation or use the computer mouse to respond.
Subjects who wear a cochlear implant, for each cochlear implant channel or pair of channels, measurements will be made from other available electrodes in their implant.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Slopes of the spread of excitation of the electrically evoked compound action potential responses
Time Frame: Baseline
Responses of the auditory nerve can be measured directly from the cochlear implant using software developed by the implant manufacturer. By changing the distance between two electrodes, we can quantify the spread of activation in the cochlea.
Baseline
Slopes of a behavioral measure of spectral resolution called psychophysical tuning curves.
Time Frame: Baseline
A behavioral test designed to measure how spectral information is processed in the auditory system. By changing the relationship between a masker and target signal, we can assess resolution.
Baseline
Changes in vowel identification scores
Time Frame: Baseline and weekly for 10 weeks after the intervention
Medial vowel identification performance in background noise. Participants will complete age-appropriate testing.
Baseline and weekly for 10 weeks after the intervention
Changes in sentence recognition scores
Time Frame: Baseline and weekly for 10 weeks after the intervention
Speech perception testing includes sentence recognition in noise. Participants will complete age-appropriate testing.
Baseline and weekly for 10 weeks after the intervention
Changes in speech-gap detection thresholds
Time Frame: Baseline and weekly for 10 weeks after the intervention
Speech perception testing includes speech-gap detection. Participants will complete age-appropriate testing.
Baseline and weekly for 10 weeks after the intervention
Changes in phoneme discrimination scores
Time Frame: Baseline and weekly for 10 weeks after the intervention
Speech perception testing includes phoneme discrimination. Participants will complete age-appropriate testing.
Baseline and weekly for 10 weeks after the intervention
Changes in time (weeks) with programming strategy
Time Frame: Baseline and weekly for 10 weeks after the intervention
Outcome measures will be obtained at weekly intervals during the intervention, and the weekly collection of those measures will be analyzed.
Baseline and weekly for 10 weeks after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Age
Time Frame: Age at baseline
A secondary age analysis on all outcome measures will be applied.
Age at baseline
Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (ITMAIS) scores
Time Frame: Baseline, and weekly for 10 weeks after the intervention
The IT-MAIS is a study-team-guided parental report about how infants and toddlers are responding to sound.
Baseline, and weekly for 10 weeks after the intervention
Macarthur-Bates vocabulary inventory scores
Time Frame: Baseline, and weekly for 10 weeks after the intervention
This test allows the study team and parents to monitor speech and language development, specifically new word learning.
Baseline, and weekly for 10 weeks after the intervention
Hearing quality of life (HEARQL) scores
Time Frame: Baseline, 5 weeks, and 10 weeks after the intervention
The HEAR-QL is a self-assessment test normed for children to assess how they hear in everyday life with different interventions
Baseline, 5 weeks, and 10 weeks after the intervention
Sound quality questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline and weekly for 10 weeks after the intervention
Participants will be asked to rate sound quality with different interventions in comparison to their everyday listening on a 7-point scale (from minus 3 - much worse, up to plus 3 - much better, 0 is the same)
Baseline and weekly for 10 weeks after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Julie Arenberg, Massachusetts Eye and Ear

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 16, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Deafness

Clinical Trials on Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

3
Subscribe