Single Strain Probiotic (CHOICE)

April 25, 2024 updated by: Rosa Sola

Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Single Strain Probiotic, Delivered in a Chewing Gum, on the Reduction of Anthropometric Adiposity Biomarkers and the Improvement of Glucose Homeostasis in Abdominally Obese Individuals.

Probiotics have been recognized as functional foods with beneficial effects against obesity and cardiometabolic diseases, such as dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes and the reduction of visceral fat mass, body weight and waist circumference.

In previous studies, it was shown that capsule/powder probiotic or postbiotic supplementation containing a single strain probiotic, could reduce anthropometric parameters, including the visceral fat area, and contribute to type 2 diabetes management in subjects with abdominal obesity. Similar findings were found when this single strain probiotic was delivered through enriched seafood sticks. Results showed that enriched seafood sticks significantly reduced insulin concentrations and HOMA-IR, pulse pressure, waist circumference, body weight and triglycerides.

These findings suggest that this specific single strain probiotic as a probiotic or postbiotic, could be a complementary strategy in the management of cardiometabolic disease risk factors.

Probiotics have mostly been studied incorporated in dairy food matrix. Other food matrices, such as chewing gum, have scarcely been exploited by the food industry. Chewing gum as a novel vehicle for probiotics presents the ability to release active ingredients into the oral cavity with a steady and rapid action. Furthermore, it has a high acceptance amongst adults and children and present few side effects.

No previous randomized controlled trials have examined the effect of a probiotic chewing gum on anthropometric adiposity biomarkers and glucose homeostasis in abdominally obese individuals.

The main objective of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy of single strain probiotic in the reduction of waist circumference in abdominally obese individuals.

The specific objectives:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of single strain probiotic in the improvement of other anthropometric biomarkers (waist-hip-ratio, body weight, BMI, total fat mass, visceral fat index, free fat mass, lean body mass, conicity index, visceral adipose tissue and subcutaneous fat).
  • To evaluate the efficacy of single strain probiotic in the management of glucose homeostasis.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of single strain probiotic in the management of serum lipid levels.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of single strain probiotic in the reduction of blood pressure and pulse pressure.
  • To asses Quality of life after single strain probiotic supplementation.
  • To identify changes in caloric intake and subjective satiety after single strain probiotic supplementation.
  • To identify changes in gastrointestinal health after single strain probiotic supplementation.
  • To identify changes in the oral microbiome after single strain probiotic supplementation.
  • To identify changes in the gastrointestinal microbiome after single strain probiotic supplementation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A total of 180 adult volunteers will be included in the intervention (90 in each arm of the intervention).

During the CHOICE study, there will be 6 visits in total. Of these visits, 3 will be face-to-face and 3 by telephone. The study visits will be the following: screening visit (V0, face-to-face): to check inclusion/exclusion criteria and, in case of satisfying the inclusion criteria; basal visit (V1, face-to- face); visits during the intervention (V2, V3 and V4 via telephone); final study visit (V5, face-to-face).

In visits V0, V1 and V5 volunteers must present themselves in fasting conditions of 8 hours to obtain blood samples. In visits V1 and V5 volunteers must bring saliva and faeces samples.

In order to measure the changes in visceral adipose tissue, up to five days prior to the visit V1 and approximately up to 3 days prior after the V5, volunteers must have a Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) for measuring visceral fat.

CHOICE Study

Visit 0 (V0, week -1): Recruitment and selection

  • Information to the volunteer and signature of the informed consent.
  • Revision of the inclusion/exclusion criteria.
  • Elaboration of study clinical history.
  • Vital signs (blood pressure/resting heart rate).
  • Checking the concomitant medication.
  • Anthropometry (waist circumference; hip; body weight and composition; height).
  • Blood sample extraction.
  • Delivery of the 3-day dietary record and the material for feaces and saliva sample recollection for V1.
  • Schedule the first visit and instructions (fasting).

Visit 1 (V1, week 0): Basal visit

  • NMR (±5 days V1).
  • Revision of study clinical history.
  • Vital signs (blood pressure/resting heart rate).
  • Checking the concomitant medication.
  • Anthropometry (waist circumference; hip; body weight and composition).
  • Blood sample extraction.
  • Abdominal fat Ultrasound.
  • Checking the 3-day dietary record.
  • Checking the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ).
  • Checking the Bing Eating Scale (BES).
  • Checking the satiety scale (VAS) and gastrointestinal health information.
  • Collection of feaces samples.
  • Collection of saliva samples.
  • Delivery of the 3-day dietary record and the material for saliva and feaces sample for V5.
  • Schedule the next telephone visit and also the final visit and instructions (fasting).

Visit 2 (V2, week 3): Follow-up during the intervention

  • Checking the concomitant medication.
  • Record adverse effects.
  • Checking adherence to product consumption (treatment compliance)
  • Checking the satiety scale.
  • Checking the gastrointestinal health.
  • Schedule the next visit and instructions.

Visit 3 (V3, week 6): Follow-up during the intervention

  • Checking the concomitant medication.
  • Record adverse effects.
  • Checking adherence to product consumption (treatment compliance)
  • Checking the satiety scale.
  • Checking the gastrointestinal health.
  • Schedule the next visit and instructions.

Visit 4 (V4, week 9): Follow-up during the intervention

  • Checking the concomitant medication.
  • Record adverse effects.
  • Checking adherence to product consumption (treatment compliance)
  • Checking the satiety scale.
  • Checking the gastrointestinal health.
  • Schedule the next visit and instructions (fasting).

Visit 5 (V2, week 12): Final visit

  • NMR (±3 days before V5).
  • Revision of study clinical history.
  • Vital signs (blood pressure/resting heart rate).
  • Anthropometry (waist circumference; hip; body weight and composition)
  • Checking the concomitant medication.
  • Blood sample extraction.
  • Abdominal fat Ultrasound.
  • Checking the 3-day dietary record.
  • Checking the TFEQ.
  • Checking the BES.
  • Record of adverse effects.
  • Checking the treatment compliance
  • Checking the satiety scale. (VAS)
  • Collection of feaces samples.
  • Collection of saliva samples.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

180

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Tarragona
      • Reus, Tarragona, Spain, 43201
        • Recruiting
        • Universitat Rovira i Virgili
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male and female subjects ≥ 18 years old.
  2. Established diagnosis of abdominal obesity: waist circumference (WC) ≥ 102 cm for men and ≥ 88 cm for women.
  3. Voluntary, written, signed, informed consent to participate in the study.
  4. Agreement to comply with the protocol and study restrictions.
  5. Females of child-bearing potential require to provide a negative urine pregnancy test.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. WC < 102 cm for men, <88 cm for women, and >150 cm.
  2. BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2.
  3. Diagnosed and pharmacologically-treated type 1 or type 2 diabetes (fasting blood glucose ≥ 7 mmol/l).
  4. Subjects with serious autoimmune disease, cardiovascular disease, liver dysfunction/disease, kidney dysfunction/disease, dementia, pancreatic disease, history of cancer within past 5 years, anemia, or any other disease or condition which, in the Investigator's opinion, could interfere with the results of the study or the safety of the subject.
  5. Immunosuppression or ongoing therapy causing immunosuppression.
  6. Pharmacologically-treated (medication/supplements) dyslipidemia.
  7. Subjects consuming antibiotics in the previous 1 month.
  8. Subjects consuming probiotics and prebiotics at least 1 month prior to inclusion in the study or during the intervention period.
  9. Use of drugs or supplements to manage body weight or body fat in the last 3 months.
  10. Use of laxatives or fiber supplements in the past 4 weeks.
  11. History of chronic active inflammatory disorders.
  12. History of bariatric surgery.
  13. History of any chronic gastrointestinal disease (e.g. IBD).
  14. Regular use of systemic or inhaled corticosteroids, or systemic immunomodulatory drugs.
  15. Significant change in tobacco, snuff, nicotine and e-cigarette use habits in the past 3 months or planned cessation of the use of these products during the trial.
  16. Active or recent (last 3 months) participation in a weight loss program (diet and/or exercise).
  17. Weight change (increase or loss) of 3 kg during the past 3 months.
  18. Pregnant or planning pregnancy during the study or breastfeeding.
  19. Participation in a clinical trial with an investigational product or drug within 60 days prior to screening.
  20. Illicit drug users.
  21. Alcohol abusers.
  22. Known hypersensitivity to any ingredients in the active or placebo products.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Probiotic
Sugar-free chewing gum with single strain probiotic and zinc. A daily dose of 2 chewing gums containing 1x10^10 Colony Forming Unit (CFU) for 12 weeks.

Sugar-free chewing gum with single strain probiotic and zinc.

The dosage will be 2 chewing a day, served at the same time and chewed for 6 minutes outside meals (for example 2h after breakfast or lunch).

Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Sugar-free chewing gum for 12 weeks.

Sugar-free chewing gum.

The dosage will be 2 chewing a day, served at the same time and chewed for 6 minutes outside meals (for example 2h after breakfast or lunch).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in waist circumference
Time Frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Difference in waist circumference (cm) measured at the umbilicus using a 150-cm anthropometric steel measuring tape from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in hip circumference
Time Frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in hip circumference (cm) measured at the widest portion of the buttocks using a 150-cm anthropometric steel measuring tape from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to Week 12
Change in waist-hip-ratio
Time Frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in waist-hip-ratio (cm) measured as waist circumference/hip circumference from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to Week 12
Change in Body weight
Time Frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in body weight (kg) measured using a Tanita MC 780-MA; Tanita Corp., Barcelona, Spain, from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to Week 12
Change in Body mass index
Time Frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in body mass index (kg/m2) calculated as weight (kg) divided to height (m2), from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to Week 12
Change in Total fat mass
Time Frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in total fat mass (% kg) measured using a Tanita MC 780-MA; Tanita Corp., Barcelona, Spain, from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to Week 12
Change in Free fat mass
Time Frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in free fat mass (%, kg) measured using a Tanita MC 780-MA; Tanita Corp., Barcelona, Spain, from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to Week 12
Change in Lean body mass
Time Frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in Lean body mass (%, kg) measured using a Tanita MC 780-MA; Tanita Corp., Barcelona, Spain, from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to Week 12
Change in Visceral fat index
Time Frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in visceral fat index obtained using a Tanita MC 780-MA; Tanita Corp., Barcelona, Spain, from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to Week 12
Change in Conicity index
Time Frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in Conicity index calculated as waist circumference (cm)/0.109 x square root of weight (kg)/height (m) from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to Week 12
Change in Visceral adipose tissue
Time Frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in Visceral adipose tissue (cm2) measured by MRI (transverse body scan in one axial slice 5cm over L5-S1) from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to Week 12
Change in Subcutaneous fat
Time Frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in Subcutaneous fat (cm2) measured by MRI, transverse body scan in one axial slice 5cm over L5-S1 from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to Week 12
Changes in Fasting blood glucose
Time Frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) measured by Standardized methods in an automated analyzer from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to Week 12
Changes in Fasting insulin
Time Frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in Fasting insulin (IU/mL) measured by Standardized methods in an automated analyzer from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to Week 12
Changes in HOMA index
Time Frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in HOMA index measured with the formula insulin x glucose/405 from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to Week 12
Changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Time Frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in glycosylated hemoglobin (%) measured by Standardized methods in an automated analyzer from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to Week 12
Changes in Total cholesterol
Time Frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in Total cholesterol (mmol/L) measured by Standardized methods in an automated analyzer from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to Week 12
Changes in HDLc
Time Frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in HDLc (mmol/L) measured by Standardized methods in an automated analyzer from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to Week 12
Changes in LDLc
Time Frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in LDLc (mmol/L) measured by Standardized methods in an automated analyzer from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to Week 12
Changes in Total Triglycerides
Time Frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences inTotal Triglycerides (mmol/L) measured by Standardized methods in an automated analyzer from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to Week 12
Changes in Systolic blood pressure
Time Frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) measured by an automatic phygmomanometer (OMRON HEM-907; Peroxfarma, Barcelona, Spain) measured twice after adult respite 2-5 min seated, with a 1-min interval in between from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to Week 12
Changes in Diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) measured by an automatic hygmomanometer (OMRON HEM-907; Peroxfarma, Barcelona, Spain) measured twice after adult respite 2-5 min seated, with a 1-min interval in between from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to Week 12
Changes in Pulse Pressure
Time Frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in Pulse pressure (mmHg), calculated as the difference between the upper and lower numbers of blood pressure, from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to Week 12
Changes in dietary intake
Time Frame: From week 0 to week 12
Differences in dietary intake assessed by a 3-day dietary record from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to week 12
Changes in flatulences
Time Frame: From week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
Differences in the presence of flatulence (yes or not), from week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
From week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
Changes in nausea
Time Frame: From week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
Differences in the presence of nausea (yes or not), from week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
From week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
Changes in reflux
Time Frame: From week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
Differences in the presence of reflux (yes or not), from week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
From week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
Changes in abdominal distension
Time Frame: From week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
Differences in the presence of abdominal distension (yes or not), from week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
From week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
Changes in diarrhea
Time Frame: From week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
Differences in the presence of diarrhea (yes or not), from week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
From week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
Changes in gut microbiota
Time Frame: From week 0 to week 12
Differences in Phyla composition, assessed by metagenomics, from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to week 12
Changes in oral microbiota
Time Frame: From week 0 to week 12
Differences in Phyla composition, assessed by metagenomics, from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to week 12
Change in Visceral adipose tissue
Time Frame: From week 0 to week 12
Differences in Visceral adipose tissue (mm) measured by ultrasound (xipho-umbilical axis, 1-5 cm above navel) from week 0 to week 12
From week 0 to week 12
Changes in Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ; Spanish edition)
Time Frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in TFEQ score from week 0 to week 12. The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 100, and higher score means a worse outcome.
From week 0 to Week 12
Changes in Bing Eating Scale (BES; Spanish edition)
Time Frame: From week 0 to Week 12
Differences in BES score from week 0 to week 12. The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 46, and higher score means a worse outcome.maximum score is 100, and higher score means a worse outcome.
From week 0 to Week 12
Changes in Satiety
Time Frame: From week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
Differences in satiety, assessed by a Visual Annual Scale (VAS), from week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12. The minimum score is -100 mm and maximum score is 100 mm, and higher score means a better outcome.
From week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
Changes in bowel habit
Time Frame: From week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12
Differences in bowel habit, assessed by bristol scale, from week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12. In this scale there are 7 descriptive points, the minimum score is "severe constipation" and maximum score is "severe diarrhea". The better outcome is in the middle of the 7 descriptive points (points 3 and 4): "normal".
From week 0 to week 3, week 6, week 9 and week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 22, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 31, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Abdominal Obesity

Clinical Trials on Single strain probiotic

3
Subscribe