RECOVER-VITAL: Platform Protocol, Appendix to Measure the Effects of Paxlovid on Long COVID Symptoms (RECOVER-VITAL)

March 10, 2024 updated by: Kanecia Obie Zimmerman

RECOVER-VITAL: A Platform Protocol for Evaluation of Interventions for Viral Persistence, Viral Reactivation, and Immune Dysregulation in Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection (PASC)

This is an appendix of master protocol (NCT05595369) designed to be flexible so that it is suitable for a wide range of settings within health care systems and in community settings where it can be integrated into COVID-19 programs and subsequent treatment plans. This sub-study is a prospective, multi-center, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial evaluating nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) in two dosing durations for the treatment of Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection (PASC). The study is evaluating potential mechanisms of action, efficacy, and safety of antivirals and other therapeutics in individuals with PASC, according to the platform protocol objectives. The hypothesis is that persistent viral infection and/or overactive/chronic immune response and inflammation are underlying contributors to PASC and that antiviral and other applicable therapies may result in viral clearance or decreased inflammation and improvement in PASC symptoms.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Detailed Description

For this appendix of the master protocol (NCT05595369), participants will be randomized to Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) vs. ritonavir control plus nirmatrelvir-matching placebo.

When there are multiple study interventions (sub-studies) available under the master protocol (NCT05595369), randomization will occur based on the specific inclusion/exclusion criteria of each appendix.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

900

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • All sites listed under NCT05595369

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

See NCT NCT05595369 for RECOVER-VITAL: Platform Protocol level exclusion criteria which applies to this appendix

Additional Appendix Level Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known pregnancy*
  2. Active or expected breastfeeding during the study
  3. Known eGFR < 30 mL/min
  4. Known severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class C)
  5. Current use of drugs highly dependent on CYP3A for clearance** and for which elevated concentrations are associated with serious and/or life-threatening reactions and which cannot be interrupted during the time of study administration and within seven days before and after study drug administration
  6. Current use of potent CYP3A inducers** where significantly reduced nirmatrelvir or ritonavir plasma concentrations may be associated with the potential for loss of virologic response and possible resistance

    • A pregnancy test must be performed at the Baseline Visit for participants who are capable of becoming pregnant.

      • A guide of drugs that may be contraindicated are listed in Section 4 CONTRAINDICATIONS of the Full Prescribing Information of the EUA for PAXLOVID. https://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=16474&format=pdf

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Paxlovid 25 day dosing
Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir 300mg, ritonavir 100mg) bid x 25 days
nirmatrelvir 300mg and ritonavir 100mg taken bid for 30 days
Experimental: Paxlovid 15 day dosing
Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir 300mg, ritonavir 100mg) bid x 15 days then ritonavir 100mg plus nirmatrelvir-matching placebo x 10 days
nirmatrelvir 300mg and ritonavir 100mg taken bid for 15 days then ritonavir 100mg taken bid plus nirmatrelvir matching placebo bid for 15 days
Placebo Comparator: Control
ritonavir 100mg plus nirmatrelvir-matching placebo bid x 25 days
ritonavir 100mg taken bid plus nirmatrelvir matching placebo bid for 30 days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in cognitive dysfunction symptom cluster, as measured by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) cognitive function T-score
Time Frame: Baseline to Day 90

The PROMIS cognitive function-8a (PRO assessment) T-score is a quantitative measure of current cognitive function.

The primary endpoint for cognitive dysfunction is improvement of at least 5 T-score points on the PROMIS-cognitive function as measured at 90 days compared to baseline.

Baseline to Day 90
Change in autonomic dysfunction symptom cluster, as measured by the orthostatic hypotension questionnaire (OHQ)
Time Frame: Baseline to Day 90

The OHQ [Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire [PRO assessment)] is a measure of orthostatic intolerance, which has been the primary presentation of patients with PASC-related autonomic dysfunction. This measure includes the Orthostatic Intolerance Daily Activity Scale (OIDAS) and the Orthostatic Intolerance Symptom Assessment (OISA).

The primary endpoint for autonomic dysfunction is improvement in autonomic function as defined by a ≥ 1-point decrease in the OHQ question 1 at 90 days compared to baseline.

Baseline to Day 90
Change in exercise intolerance symptom cluster, as measured by the Modified Depaul Symptom Questionnaire-Post Exertional Malaise (DSQ-PEM)
Time Frame: Baseline to Day 90

DSQ-PEM assesses symptom frequency and severity over a 6-month look back period, however, for the purposes of this study, it will be modified to assess over a 1-week look back period. Frequency is rated on a 5-point Likert scale: 0 = none of the time, 1 = a little of the time, 2 = about half the time, 3 = most of the time, and 4 = all of the time. Severity is also rated on a 5-point Likert scale: 0 = symptom not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = very severe.

For exercise intolerance, the primary endpoint is improvement in PEM, defined as having no symptoms of moderate or greater severity with 50% or more frequency as determined by the DSQ-PEM short form at day 90.

Baseline to Day 90

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in cognitive dysfunction symptom cluster, as measured by a neurocognitive battery
Time Frame: Baseline to Day 90
The neurocognitive battery outcome is a binary indicator of whether the participant has evidence of deficits (at least one standard deviation below the mean on at least one test within the battery).
Baseline to Day 90
Change in autonomic dysfunction symptom cluster, as measured by the active stand test
Time Frame: Baseline to Day 90
The active stand test outcome is a binary indicator of whether the follow-up active stand test result was abnormal or normal.
Baseline to Day 90
Change in exercise intolerance symptom cluster, as measured by the endurance shuttle walk test (ESWT)
Time Frame: Baseline to Day 90
The ESWT [endurance shuttle walk test (performance measure)] consists of timed walking on a 10m course.The ESWT will primarily be analyzed as a binary endpoint defined as an increase of at least 3 minutes of walking time at follow-up compared to baseline.
Baseline to Day 90
Occurrence of individual SAEs
Time Frame: Baseline to Day 90
Baseline to Day 90
Occurrence of one or more SAEs
Time Frame: Baseline to Day 90
Baseline to Day 90
Occurrence of AEs and SAEs leading to discontinuation
Time Frame: Baseline to Day 90
Baseline to Day 90
Occurrence of Events of Special Interest (ESIs)
Time Frame: Baseline to Day 90
Baseline to Day 90
Duration of ESIs
Time Frame: Baseline to Day 90
Baseline to Day 90
Adherence in intervention versus control groups as measured by number of missed doses
Time Frame: Baseline to Day 90
Baseline to Day 90

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 26, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The investigators will share the summary of results on the study website: https:// recovercovid.org/

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Long COVID

Clinical Trials on Paxlovid 25 day dosing

3
Subscribe