Effectiveness of Two Health Education Interventions in the Prevention of Caries and Gingivitis in Orthodontic Patients

March 15, 2025 updated by: Adriana del Pilar Forero, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing and Conventional Oral Health Education (OHEc) Versus OHEc in the Prevention and Control of Dental Caries and Gingivitis in Subjects With Fixed Orthodontic Appliances. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Dental caries and gingivitis are classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as an important public health problem due to their high prevalence and incidence worldwide despite the development of public policies to combat them. They are chronic diseases that have a severe impact in terms of pain and suffering, impairment of function and effect on quality of life. During orthodontic treatments, the most common adverse event is the appearance of dental caries lesions and gingivitis due to increased retention and change of dental biofilm composition or difficulty of removal with conventional oral hygiene techniques. Efforts to implement various conventional preventive interventions of self-care and education have not decreased their incidence, so it is necessary to implement motivational interventions to help adolescents and young adults to make positive changes in their oral health habits, which are constant and lasting and prevent and control gingivitis and caries.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Dental caries and gingivitis are multifactorial diseases, however the only necessary factor, although insufficient for their development, is bacterial biofilm; brackets significantly increase its retention and limit self- cleaning mechanisms, representing a challenge in clinical practice. Motivational interventions in oral health could be an alternative to generate behavioral changes in oral health and daily self-care routines that are more sustainable over time compared to conventional education models in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. A randomized controlled clinical trial open to subjects and single-blinded (investigators) of parallel groups is proposed for the evaluation of the effect of motivational interviewing combined with conventional oral health education (OHEc) versus OHEc, in the prevention of dental caries lesions and gingivitis. A sample size of 94 patients in total is proposed, distributed 47 in each arm of the study, with a follow-up of the cohort for six months. The baseline risk will be established before the placement of fixed appliances (T0), and a follow-up will be carried out during six months, with assessments in one (T1), three(T2) and six months (T3) after cementation, where the presence of gingivitis, caries and changes in risk variables, adverse events and adherence to conventional and motivational interventions, will be measured.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

94

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Bogotá, Colombia, 111321
        • Recruiting
        • Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients enrolled in the different orthodontic postgraduate clinics of the National University of Colombia who requires treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances
  • 13 years old up to 28 years of age.
  • Willingness to participate in the study and signature of the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with untreated caries lesions
  • Patients with periodontal diseases or experience
  • Previous orthodontics treatments
  • Severe fluorosis or enamel abnormalities.
  • Medical compromise or treatments generating hyposalivation or gingival enlargement
  • Craniomaxillary anomalies
  • Cognitive or motor disability
  • Pregnancy.
  • Dependence to alcohol, nicotine or psychoactive substances

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional Oral health Education
Conventional oral health education and nutritional guidelines prior to the placement of fixed appliances, by means of a 5-8 minute video and instructive brochure.
Conventional educational methods can be verbal, written or visual and can be combined for greater understanding and effectiveness in oral health and dietary routines. The education are imparted in the first appointment of the appliances cementation by a video and oral health instruction booklet and each patient receive an oral hygiene kit. This education is repeated in month 1 and 3 after appliances cementation.
Experimental: Motivational interviewing + Conventional Oral health Education
Include the conventional oral health education of the control group and a 30 minute motivational interviewing (MI)
Conventional educational methods can be verbal, written or visual and can be combined for greater understanding and effectiveness in oral health and dietary routines. The education are imparted in the first appointment of the appliances cementation by a video and oral health instruction booklet and each patient receive an oral hygiene kit. This education is repeated in month 1 and 3 after appliances cementation.
In addition to the conventional educational method, a motivational interviewing (MI) by Miller and Rollnick of 30 minutes will be used, with an initial script according to the stage of change in each patient in T0. The reinforcements of motivational interviewing are in month one and three after the installation of the braces, they will have the same methodology but will be focused on the aspects that in the previous session or in the clinical assessment were detected as the most important deficiencies or risk factors for the patient.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in ICDAS score of the caries
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in incidence of caries on the vestibular and proximal surfaces by ICDAS and radiographic ICDAS in T0 (baseline),T1 (1 month),T2 (3 months) and T3 (6 months) will be censured when the patient presents the outcome, the study period ends (six months) or when the follow-up period finishes for a reason other than the event of interest being studied.
6 months
Evaluation of gingivitis
Time Frame: 6 months
Changes in modification of the Silness and Löe gingival index described by Williams at T0 (baseline), T1 (one month), T2 (three months) and T3 (six months) after the start of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Plaque index
Time Frame: 6 months
Changes in modification of the Silness and Löe index described by Williams at T0 (baseline), T1 (one month), T2 (three months) and T3 (six months) after the start of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances.
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events
Time Frame: 6 months
Measurement of possible adverse events during educational interventional at T0 (baseline), T1 (one month), T2 (three months) and T3 (six months) after the start of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Adriana Forero Niño, DDs, 111211

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 20, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 20, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gingivitis

Clinical Trials on Conventional Educational interventions

Subscribe