Activity Pacing for Fatigue Management

August 14, 2023 updated by: Northumbria University

Activity Pacing, Fatigue Management, and Self-regulation Strategies as a Promising Approach for Managing Fatigue Symptoms and for Promoting Physical Activity in Adults Who Experience Fatigue

This project will focus on perceived fatigue as a barrier to physical activity participation and will explore if and how activity pacing, fatigue management, and self-regulation strategies can help to overcome this barrier in adults with chronic conditions who experience fatigue symptoms. The main aims are:

  1. To demonstrate the differences and similarities on activity pacing, perceived fatigue, self-regulation, physical activity, and health-related quality of life in adults who experience fatigue by comparing individuals who have been through an activity pacing program or not.
  2. To explore thoughts, experiences, needs, and perspectives on activity pacing of adults with fatigue and health professionals as well as any ideas for future development of an optimal intervention.

Participants will be invited to complete questionnaires on several variables (activity pacing, physical activity, fatigue, health-related quality of life, and self-regulation of physical activity). In addition, they will be invited to wear an Actigraph for 7 full days and they will also be invited to a focus group interview.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Activity pacing is a fatigue management strategy that regulates energy and activity levels while maintaining or increasing engagement in physical activity. This approach is particularly beneficial for individuals with chronic conditions who experience significant fatigue as they often struggle with sustained physical activity participation due to recurring patterns of overexertion and subsequent fatigue or pain. Therefore, activity pacing strategies are important because individuals learn to manage fatigue symptoms, optimize physical activity behaviour, and accomplish a more stable activity pacing pattern, which will improve their health-related quality of life and well-being.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

54

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Newcastle, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • Northumbria University
        • Contact:
          • Ioulia Barakou

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults with chronic conditions who experience fatigue

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with a chronic condition
  • Experience fatigue
  • Ambulatory

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children
  • Wheelchair users

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Adults who experience fatigue and have been through an activity pacing program
Adults with chronic conditions who experience fatigue recruited from Cresta Fatigue Clinic, Newcastle, UK
Adults who experience fatigue and have not been through an activity pacing program
Adults with chronic conditions who experience fatigue recruited from the waiting list of Cresta Fatigue Clinic, Newcastle, UK
Health professionals working on activity pacing
Health professionals who are working on Cresta Fatigue Clinic, Newcastle, UK

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived fatigue
Time Frame: 1 point in time measuring for the past 7 days
Fatigue Severity Scale is a 9-item questionnaire assessing the impact of perceived fatigue in adults with chronic disorders. FSS is valid and reliable to determine the impact of perceived fatigue among several clinical populations.
1 point in time measuring for the past 7 days
Physical activity
Time Frame: 1 point in time measuring for the past 7 days
Self-reported PA: IPAQ is a 7-item measure that assesses the intensity of physical activity and sitting time in their daily lives . It has been validated in adults with stroke .
1 point in time measuring for the past 7 days
Engagement in Pacing and Perceived Risk of Overactivity
Time Frame: 1 point in time measuring for the past 7 days
The Activity Pacing Questionnaire (APQ) is a 7-item measure assessing activity pacing and risk of overactivity. Reliability and construct validity have been investigated and the paper is in preparation.
1 point in time measuring for the past 7 days
Perceived Fatigue
Time Frame: 1 point in time measuring for the past 7 days
2)FACIT-F (version 4) is a 40-item questionnaire evaluating self-reported fatigue and its influence on everyday activities and function among adults with cancer and older people experiencing fatigue . FACIT-F is valid and reliable in several patient populations.
1 point in time measuring for the past 7 days
Objective Physical Activity
Time Frame: 7 days
Participants will be invited to wear an Actigraph for 7 full days.
7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-regulation
Time Frame: 1 point in time measuring for the past 7 days
Physical Activity Self-Regulation scale (PASR-12) is a 12-item measure assessing self-regulation for physical activity. PASR-12 has demonstrated validity and reliability in older adults.
1 point in time measuring for the past 7 days
Health-related Quality of Life
Time Frame: 1 point in time measuring for the past 7 days
RAND-12 health status inventory is a 12-item questionnaire that evaluates the health-related quality of life. Literature supports acceptable construct validity and test-retest reliability of the RAND-12 among clinical populations.
1 point in time measuring for the past 7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fatigue

3
Subscribe