CT Coronary Angiography for Type 2 Myocardial Infarction

September 26, 2023 updated by: NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

A Pilot Clinical Trial of CT Coronary Angiography for Patients With Suspected Type 2 Myocardial Infarction

This study is to explore whether a computed tomography (CT) scan of the heart arteries might improve the care of patients that have presented with a suspected Type 2 myocardial infarction (MI). The Investigators hope to demonstrate that these patients may be the ideal group of patients to benefit from cardiac CT scan imaging by; 1. confirming whether they have any disease in their heart arteries 2. demonstrating the severity of the heart artery disease 3. revealing an alternative cause for their presentation 4. avoiding the need for an invasive heart artery angiogram.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

An increasing number of patients present to hospital with a heart attack (myocardial infarction, MI). Heart attacks can be caused by instability and narrowing in heart arteries (Type 1 MI) or strain on the heart (Type 2 MI). Type 2 MIs can be the result of other problems with the heart including inflammation and rhythm problems or other conditions such as infection or low blood count. Both Type 1 and Type 2 MI patients have increased risk of further problems following this presentation. Deciding whether a patient has suffered a Type 1 MI or a Type 2 MI can be very difficult leaving uncertainty for patients and health care staff. Often patients with Type 2 myocardial infarction are either referred for an invasive coronary angiogram (a procedure where dye is injected into the heart arteries directly) or have no further investigations. Invasive angiograms carry a small risk of complications including heart attack, stroke and, rarely, death.

Cardiac CT scanning has emerged in the last 20 years as the first test usually performed to investigate patients that present with stable chest pain symptoms to the outpatient department. The role of cardiac CT in patients that present as an emergency with a suspected heart attack is not yet established.

To date, there are no substantive data on the role of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) in patients with known or suspected Type 2 MI. A pilot study is proposed to address the information gaps. The specific areas of uncertainty include feasibility of enrolling into an imaging trial during acute medical care, feasibility of randomisation (including compliance and cross-overs), incremental diagnostic value, safety (procedure and post-procedure) and healthcare resource utilisation. The study aims to address the gap in evidence highlighted by the recent European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes, 'evaluating diagnostic strategies to better classify patients according to their type of MI (Type 1 vs Type 2)'.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Glasgow, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • Queen Elizabeth University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with known or suspected Type 2 MI

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unable to provide written informed consent
  2. Known severe coronary artery disease
  3. Previous PCI
  4. Previous CABG
  5. Severe renal dysfunction, defined as an eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2
  6. Tachycardia (>75bpm) refractory to heart rate control
  7. Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Usual Care
Active Comparator: CT coronary angiography + usual care
Patients will undergo a CTCA according to local, standard protocol.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in primary diagnosis
Time Frame: At discharge from recruiting hospital (assessed up to day 30)
The primary outcome is a change in the primary diagnosis defined as a difference in the final diagnosis at discharge compared to the initial diagnosis prior to study recruitment. The primary outcome will therefore take account of the diagnostic effect of CTCA and any changes that might normally occur during standard care.
At discharge from recruiting hospital (assessed up to day 30)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of invasive coronary angiography
Time Frame: 3 months
Patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography following presentation
3 months
Major adverse cardiovascular events
Time Frame: 12 months
Myocardial infarction, stroke or death
12 months
Rate of coronary revascularisation
Time Frame: 12 months
Either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting
12 months
Rate of hospital readmission
Time Frame: 12 months
Readmission to hospital for any reason
12 months
Rate of additional cardiovascular investigations
Time Frame: 12 months
Referral to outpatient clinic or for additional cardiovascular test (including exercise tolerance testing, echocardiography, myocardial perfusion imaging, cardiac MRI)
12 months
Health related quality of life assessment
Time Frame: 6 months
EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Reported as 5 digit code (Range 11111 - 55555) with higher numbers indicating worse quality of life and EQ visual analogue scale (Range 0-100) with higher numbers indicating better quality of life.
6 months
Functional assessment
Time Frame: 6 months
Duke Activity Status Index (DASI). Range 0 - 58.2. Higher score indicates better functional status.
6 months
Estimated cost of health care
Time Frame: 12 months
Health care resource utilisation including length of hospital stay, investigations and treatment
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richard Good, MD, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 24, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 2, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocardial Infarction

Clinical Trials on CT coronary angiography

3
Subscribe