Long Term Predictors of Graft Patency After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (Multi-slice CT Coronary Angiography Study Validated by Coronary Angiography)

August 2, 2021 updated by: Eman Abdallah Hasaballah Farag, Assiut University

Predictors of Long Term Graft Patency After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (Multi-slice CT Coronary Angiography Study Validated by Coronary Angiography)

To detect and evaluate the predictors of graft patency after coronary artery bypass graft surgery as assessed by multi-slice CT coronary angiography validated by coronary angiography

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is an effective treatment of complex, multi-vessel coronary artery disease(1) .The majority of these patients receive left internal mammary artery (IMA) grafts to the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery and saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) or other conduits to the remaining vessels. Based on small studies of selected groups of patients, it is generally believed that SVGs have a 40% to 50% 10-year patency and that the LIMA has a 90% to 95% 10-year patency The success of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is dependent on the long-term patency of the arterial and venous grafts.(2) Graft failure is a surrogate marker for future cardiac events, including repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction ,and death(3)(4). Vein graft occlusion in the perioperative period is due to thrombosis resulting from technical problems. Vein graft occlusion within the first year is attributed to intimal proliferation, although after 1 year, atherosclerosis is thought to be the dominant factor (5) . LIMA graft failure was defined as diffuse and >95% conduit narrowing ("string sign" When IMA graft failure occurs, technical error is the most common cause in the early postoperative period, while late (and rare) IMA failure include progressive fibro-intimal proliferation and atherosclerosis either in the IMA graft or in the native LAD vessel)(6) Traditionally, graft patency has been evaluated with coronary angiography (ICA) but, since the advent of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT), the temptation to use a noninvasive and widely available technique to study coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients has been stronger. The introduction of scanners like 64-slice and 128-slice upwards-along with new scan protocols opens new perspectives in non-invasive assessment of graft patency.(7) The pooled sensitivity and specificity of detecting complete graft occlusions - according to( Barbero et al ,2016) ,was 99% and 99% respectively as compared to the standard of coronary angiography. (8) Computed tomographic angiography, labeled as Appropriate test for evaluation of bypass grafts and coronary anatomy (9)

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Assiut, Egypt, 71515
        • Assiut University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

• All patients underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery more than one year ago complaining of chest pain presented to Assuit university heart center

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery more than one year ago complaining of chest pain are included in the study from September 2017 to September 2018
  • Written consent, free and informed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine >1.6 mg/dl).

    • Contrast hypersensitivity.
    • Irregular heart rhythm (e.g. Atrial fibrillation).
    • Inability to hold breath for at least 10 seconds

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
detection of predictors of long term graft patency following CABG
Time Frame: 1 year

a. Primary (main): evaluation of long term predictors of graft patency following coronary artery bypass graft surgery

  1. Clinical risk factors e.g Age, gender, smoking, Diabetus mellitus, hypertension, Dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, medications especially antiplatelet and statin therapy, beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers .
  2. Biochemical risk factors e.g HDL, LDL, Total cholesterol level
  3. Angiographic risk factors : competitive flow and degree of stenosis in the native vessels.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Assessment of re-hospitalization rate following CABG
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Relation between type of the graft and graft patency
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Detection of sensitivity and specificity of CT coronary angiography for detection and assessment of graft patency
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 29, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on multi-slice CT coronary angiography and coronary angiography

3
Subscribe