Evaluation of Microinjected Amnion-derived Collagen by Dermapen in the Smoothing of Skin Wrinkles

October 2, 2023 updated by: Nashwa Radwan, Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority
The aim of this work was to assess the efficacy of irradiated amniotic collagen matrix in comparison with platelet rich plasma in facial rejuvenation.The present study included 20 patients with facial wrinkles divided into 2 groups using split face technique: Group (A) subjected to microneedling with amnion gel on the right side of the face . Group (B) subjected to microneedling with PRP on the other side of the face.According to a skin analysis camera (antera camera), there was statistically significant improvement after treatment and between both groups as regard to the roughness(texture) and melanin appeared by Antera camera in which group (A) showed better improvement than group (B). Also, skin biopsies showed improvement in both sides after treatment in which the epidermis was thicker, collagen bundles were broader and thicker than before treatment also elastic fibers were longer, evenly arranged and thicker than before treatment. The patients were followed up over a period of 3 months after the last session with no complications or changes were occurred and the results of sessions were maintained.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 29
        • Egyptain Atomic Energy Authority

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who did not receive any treatment for aging within the last 6 months.
  • Patients who accepted to participate in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with bleeding, coagulation disorders, severe anemia, liver disease, renal disease, recurrent facial herpes, keloid formation, pregnant, and lactating females.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Amnion Collagen
The right side of the split-face was treated by micro-injection of Amnion Collagen
A collagen extract sourced from the human amniotic membrane
Active Comparator: PRP
The left side of the split-face was treated by micro-injection of Platelet-rich plasma (PRP)
Autologous preparation of PRP
Other Names:
  • PRP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of facial wrinkles according to wrinkle severity rate scale (WSRS)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
grade 0 = no wrinkles, grade I = just perceptible wrinkle, grade II = shallow wrinkles, grade III = moderately deep wrinkles, grade IV = deep wrinkle with well-defined edges, grade V = very deep wrinkle with redundant fold.
2 weeks
Evaluation of facial wrinkles according to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
No improvement or mild improvement less than 25% moderate improvement = 26%-50% marked improvement = 51%-75% excellent improvement = more than 75%
2 weeks
skin pigmentation assessed by skin hyper-pigmentation index
Time Frame: 2 weeks
score: No pigmentation=1, sever pigmentation=4
2 weeks
Histopathology improvement of skin biopsy
Time Frame: 2 weeks
improved skin structure=1, non-improved skin structure=0
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient's satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 weeks
All patient were asked about their satisfaction at the final visit The range of this measure: very satisfied, satisfied, slightly satisfied or not satisfied
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 22, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 8, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 4, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 2, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 3122019NCRRT

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Facial Wrinkles - Rough Texture - Hyperpigmentation

Clinical Trials on Amnion collagen

3
Subscribe