A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Satisfaction of RHC Serum Combined With RHC(III) Injection

March 19, 2024 updated by: DeYi Aesthetic Medical Clinic

A Prospective, Single-center, Randomized, Split-face Controlled, Single-blind Evaluation, Superiority Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of RHC(III) for Injection Combined With SkinCeuticals RHC Serum.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of recombinant humanized collagen (type III) solution for injection combined with SkinCeuticals recombinant humanized collagen (RHC) serum Participants will be assessed by subjective questionnaire (FACE-Q Satisfaction with skin,Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale, et al) and some medical instruments (VISIA,Ultrascan UC22 et al)

Study Overview

Detailed Description

With the growth of photoaging and age, more people have the appearance of fine lines, skin laxity, roughness. Clinical evidences shown that RHC III injection can effectively improve fine line, skin plumpness and firmness to some extent; SkinCeutials RHC serum is capable of improving skin plumpness, firmness and elasticity, and improve rough skin condition.

A Prospective, single-center, randomized, split-face controlled, single-blind evaluation, superior efficacy clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of recombinant humanized collagen (type III) solution for injection combined with SkinCeuticals recombinant humanized collagen (RHC) serum, to explore the synergetic effects of injectable integrated skincare in Chinese population.

A total of 54 subjects will be enrolled in this study, and half of the face of each subject will be randomly assigned 1:1 to the test side and the control side.

The subjects will receive one injection of recombinant type III humanized collagen solution and will be followed up for 12 weeks after injection treatment.

Experimental group: SkinCeuticals RHC cream and Regular cream (twice daily) Control group: Regular cream (twice daily)

Participants will be assessed by subjective questionnaire (FACE-Q Satisfaction with skin,Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale, et al) and some medical instruments (VISIA,Ultrascan UC22 et al)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women between the ages of 30 and 55;
  • According to the researchers' judgment, the subjects' facial skin is rough, dry and has obvious fine lines, and the Glogau photoaging rating is II to IV, which can be improved by treatment;
  • Subjects voluntarily sign informed consent and agree to complete the follow-up prescribed by the trial.
  • Note: All the above items are eligible for inclusion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The subject has facial scars or skin diseases that may affect the judgment of the treatment effect, is in the stage of allergic attack, or has active infections (such as inflammatory acne, herpes simplex, etc.), and/or unhealed wounds, and is in the stage of progressive skin diseases such as vitiligo, psoriasis, etc.;
  • had received or planned to have the following surgery or treatment prior to screening that affected the trial during the study period:

    1. Before screening or during the study period, it is planned to perform comprehensive surgical treatment for facial wrinkles, such as silicone, autologous fat transplantation, facial lift surgery, catch-line lifting, permanent dermal fillers (such as polymethyl methacrylate);
    2. Treatment with semi-permanent dermal fillers (e.g., L-lactic acid, hydroxyapatite, polycaprolactones, etc.) is planned for 18 months before screening or during the study period;
    3. Treatment with biodegradable dermal fillers (such as sodium hyaluronate gel or collagen) planned for 12 months prior to screening or during the study period;
    4. Screening 6 months before or during the study period is planned in the overall Department: Botulinum toxin, plastic therapy, energy equipment other than light conditioning therapy and intense pulse light (such as laser, radio frequency, ultrasound, etc.), skin grinding, chemical exfoliation of medium depth or greater depth or other exfoliative treatment (such as trichloroacetic acid, carbonic acid, 10% or more concentration of fruit acid or 2% or more concentration of salicylic acid, etc.);
    5. Light conditioning therapy, intense pulsed light, shallow exfoliation, or other exfoliative therapy (e.g., hydroxy acid at concentrations below 10% or salicylic acid at concentrations below 2%, etc.) are planned for 3 months prior to screening or during the study period;
  • a history of multiple severe or hereditary allergies to any part of the body, who plan to undergo desensitization during the study period, or who are allergic to the ingredients of the drugs or devices used in the experimental treatment (hyaluronic acid, streptococcal protein, lidocaine or other amide anesthetics, etc.);
  • the subject has a history of abnormal coagulation function, or has used or plans to use anticoagulation, antiplatelet, or thrombolytic therapy (e.g., warfarin, aspirin, etc.) within 14 days prior to screening;
  • pregnancy or breastfeeding, planned pregnancy during the test, or positive pregnancy test results during the screening period;
  • The subject has a history of serious diseases of major organs or active autoimmune diseases;
  • Those with hypertrophic scars or cicatricial constitution;
  • Participants who have participated in other clinical trials within 30 days prior to the screening period;
  • The subject is judged by the investigator to have other systemic diseases that are not suitable for participation in the study;
  • Subjects who are unable to communicate or do not follow instructions;
  • Other conditions that the investigator considers inappropriate to participate in this experiment.

Note: All the above items are "no" to be selected

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Test Side
Each subject will randomly formulate the face on one side as the test side
Each subject will receive one injection of Recombinant type III humanized collagen solution for injection on the whole face
Subjects received SkinCeuticals recombinant humanized collagen (RHC) serum application on the test side face
Subjects received Regular face cream smear application on the whole face
Placebo Comparator: Control Side
Each subject will randomly formulate the face on one side as the control side
Each subject will receive one injection of Recombinant type III humanized collagen solution for injection on the whole face
Subjects received Regular face cream smear application on the whole face

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FACE-Q Satisfaction with skin
Time Frame: 4 weeks after injection

FACE-Q is a recently developed and validated patient reported outcome measure (PROM) tool that allows clinicians to assess patient perspectives after medical aesthetic treatment in the face.The PROM is used to assess the satisfaction skin care as well as its treatment on the patient's quality of life (QoL).

The FACE-Q utilizes five scales to measure the psychometric, QoL, patient experience, and cosmetic outcomes. Raw scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale with a higher score indicating a better satisfaction

4 weeks after injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) Rates
Time Frame: Enrollment day, 2 weeks ±3 days after injection, 4 weeks ±5 days after injection, 8 weeks ±2 weeks after injection, and 12 weeks ±2 weeks after injection.

Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) is a 5-level scale ranging from "1" (very much improved) to "5" (very much worse) to determine the degree of improvement of the treated areas.

the rates of I-GAIS was defined as the proportion of subjects with a GAIS score of 1-3.

Enrollment day, 2 weeks ±3 days after injection, 4 weeks ±5 days after injection, 8 weeks ±2 weeks after injection, and 12 weeks ±2 weeks after injection.
Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (S-GAIS) Rates
Time Frame: Enrollment day, 2 weeks ±3 days after injection, 4 weeks ±5 days after injection, 8 weeks ±2 weeks after injection, and 12 weeks ±2 weeks after injection.

Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (S-GAIS) is a 5-level scale ranging from "1" (very much improved) to "5" (very much worse) to determine the degree of improvement of the treated areas.

the rates of S-GAIS was defined as the proportion of subjects with a GAIS score of 1-3.

Enrollment day, 2 weeks ±3 days after injection, 4 weeks ±5 days after injection, 8 weeks ±2 weeks after injection, and 12 weeks ±2 weeks after injection.
Improvement rate assessed by Atlas
Time Frame: Enrollment day, 2 weeks ±3 days after injection, 4 weeks ±5 days after injection, 8 weeks ±2 weeks after injection, and 12 weeks ±2 weeks after injection.
The investigator evaluated the improvement around the face using Atlas facial wrinkle atlas, a validated wrinkle scoring system, in which crow's feet were divided into 7 different grades, forehead wrinkles were divided into 9 grades, forehead fine lines were divided into 8 grades, and Yintang wrinkles were divided into 7 grades. A higher grade means more wrinkles.The improvement rate was defined as the proportion of subjects with at least 1 point reduction in the wrinkle rating in different regions.
Enrollment day, 2 weeks ±3 days after injection, 4 weeks ±5 days after injection, 8 weeks ±2 weeks after injection, and 12 weeks ±2 weeks after injection.
Change in Cutometer® dual Analysis Score
Time Frame: Enrollment day, 2 weeks ±3 days after injection, 4 weeks ±5 days after injection, 8 weeks ±2 weeks after injection, and 12 weeks ±2 weeks after injection.
The Cutometer® dual will be used to assess changes in skin outcomes. Analysis will be conducted by a board-certified dermatologist at baseline and follow up. Evaluated skin properties/parameters included skin moisture content, transepidermal water loss, skin elasticity, and skin tightness. Collection of these parameters will be performed using a probe dedicated to the Cutometer®dual. The results are then used to generate a comprehensive analysis report, which includes both the quantitative measurements and qualitative assessments, along with any corresponding scores or ratings assigned to different skin attributes.
Enrollment day, 2 weeks ±3 days after injection, 4 weeks ±5 days after injection, 8 weeks ±2 weeks after injection, and 12 weeks ±2 weeks after injection.
Change in VISIA® Skin Analysis Score
Time Frame: Enrollment day, 2 weeks ±3 days after injection, 4 weeks ±5 days after injection, 8 weeks ±2 weeks after injection, and 12 weeks ±2 weeks after injection.
VISIA® Skin Analysis system will be used to assess changes in skin outcomes. Analysis will be conducted by a board-certified dermatologist at Baseline and follow up. The VISIA® Skin Analysis system will be used to capture the images which will then be processed by the VISIA software.The software utilizes advanced algorithms to detect and measure specific skin attributes. The skin attributes/parameters evaluated will be spots, pores, wrinkles, texture (roughness and smoothness of the skin), purple patches of the dermal layer, brown patches of the dermal layer, red areas and porphyrins. These parameters are evaluated using the captured images and the specialized algorithms employed by the VISIA software. The results are then used to generate a comprehensive analysis report, which includes both the quantitative measurements and qualitative assessments, along with any corresponding scores or ratings assigned to different skin attributes.
Enrollment day, 2 weeks ±3 days after injection, 4 weeks ±5 days after injection, 8 weeks ±2 weeks after injection, and 12 weeks ±2 weeks after injection.
FACE-Q Satisfaction with Outcome
Time Frame: Enrollment day, 2 weeks ±3 days after injection, 4 weeks ±5 days after injection, 8 weeks ±2 weeks after injection, and 12 weeks ±2 weeks after injection.

FACE-Q is a recently developed and validated patient reported outcome measure (PROM) tool that allows clinicians to assess patient perspectives after medical aesthetic treatment in the face.The PROM is used to assess the perspective and impact of skin care as well as its treatment on the patient's quality of life (QoL).

The FACE-Q utilizes five scales to measure the psychometric, QoL, patient experience, and cosmetic outcomes. Raw scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale with a higher score indicating a better outcome

Enrollment day, 2 weeks ±3 days after injection, 4 weeks ±5 days after injection, 8 weeks ±2 weeks after injection, and 12 weeks ±2 weeks after injection.
FACE-Q Satisfaction with skin
Time Frame: Enrollment day, 2 weeks ±3 days after injection, 8 weeks ±2 weeks after injection, and 12 weeks ±2 weeks after injection.

FACE-Q is a recently developed and validated patient reported outcome measure (PROM) tool that allows clinicians to assess patient perspectives after medical aesthetic treatment in the face.The PROM is used to assess the satisfaction skin care as well as its treatment on the patient's quality of life (QoL).

The FACE-Q utilizes five scales to measure the psychometric, QoL, patient experience, and cosmetic outcomes. Raw scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale with a higher score indicating a better satisfaction

Enrollment day, 2 weeks ±3 days after injection, 8 weeks ±2 weeks after injection, and 12 weeks ±2 weeks after injection.
Change of the thickness and density of subjects' facial dermis
Time Frame: Enrollment day, 2 weeks ±3 days after injection, 8 weeks ±2 weeks after injection, and 12 weeks ±2 weeks after injection.
Evaluation of the thickness and density of subjects' facial dermis. Subject will be submitted to the Ultrascan UC 22 equipment.
Enrollment day, 2 weeks ±3 days after injection, 8 weeks ±2 weeks after injection, and 12 weeks ±2 weeks after injection.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes from baseline in skin uniformity and spot area ratio measurements collected by VISIA's face image acquisition instrument.
Time Frame: Enrollment day, 2 weeks ±3 days after injection, 8 weeks ±2 weeks after injection, and 12 weeks ±2 weeks after injection.
VISIA® Skin Analysis system will be used to assess changes in skin outcomes. Analysis will be conducted by a board-certified dermatologist at Baseline and follow up. The VISIA® Skin Analysis system will be used to capture the images which will then be processed by the VISIA software.The software utilizes advanced algorithms to detect and measure specific skin attributes. The skin attributes/parameters evaluated will be skin uniformity and spot area ratio. These parameters are evaluated using the captured images and the specialized algorithms employed by the VISIA software. The results are then used to generate a comprehensive analysis report, which includes both the quantitative measurements and qualitative assessments, along with any corresponding scores or ratings assigned to different skin attributes.
Enrollment day, 2 weeks ±3 days after injection, 8 weeks ±2 weeks after injection, and 12 weeks ±2 weeks after injection.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xiaolei Qin, DeYi Aesthetic Medical Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SKCCOL002

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

All data obtained during a clinical trial is owned jointly by the investigator and the clinical trial facility. Under the premise of mutual consultation, the clinical trial institution or the investigator decides to publish the research results.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Facial Wrinkles

Clinical Trials on Recombinant type III humanized collagen solution for injection

3
Subscribe