A Fruit and Vegetable Prescription Program

April 11, 2024 updated by: Susan Veldheer, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

A Pilot, 3-arm Randomized Controlled Trial of a Fruit and Vegetable Prescription Program for Patients With Type Two Diabetes

Dietary intake of fruits and vegetables (F&V) is a cornerstone for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, however less than 16% of Hispanic adults consume the recommended number of servings each day. F&V prescription (F&V Rx) programs are embedded into clinical settings and provide patients with vouchers to purchase F&V at local retailers. The proposed study aims to test the effects of a F&V Rx on diabetes self-management education and support (DSME/S) uptake and retention, dietary intake of F&V and diet quality, glucose control (hemoglobin A1c), and program implementation outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Consuming a nutrient-dense diet, rich in fruits and vegetables (F&Vs) is at the cornerstone of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) treatment. Yet, among Hispanic adults, only 16% meet the recommended minimum F&V intake recommendations and have higher rates of T2DM than non-Hispanic whites (16.6% versus 13.3%, respectively). F&V Prescription (F&V Rx) programs are embedded in clinical settings, target medically high-risk patients such as those with T2DM, and provide them with vouchers to purchase F&V at local retailers. Preliminary F&V Rx studies in patients with T2DM have found F&V intake increases of 0.2-1.6 servings per day and hemoglobin A1c (A1c) reductions from 0.35-0.71% [3.8 -7.8 mmol/mol]. However, none of these studies included diabetes self-management education and support (DSME/S) which can lead to A1c decreases from 0.24% to 1.0% [2.6-10.9 mmol/mol]. The team conducted a pilot F&V Rx study where DSME/S attendance was incentivized by providing a F&V Rx at each session. Although DSME/S uptake is typically very low after referral (around 5-7%), the program had a 73% first session attendance rate. Further, at 7 months post-program, a clinically- and statistically-significant reduction was found in A1c of 1.3% [14.2 mmol/mol] (p=.001). Although the receipt of the F&V Rx vouchers was contingent upon DSME/S attendance in the study, other T2DM-focused F&V Rx studies did not have DSME/S attendance requirements and also saw A1c reductions. Thus, understanding the effect of a F&V Rx on DSME/S uptake and retention with and without attendance requirements is a key design issue that must be evaluated. This proposal is in response to PAS 20-160 for short-term, pilot randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to acquire preliminary data regarding trial design. The team proposes a 3-Arm, 16-week, pilot RCT (n=120) for low-income adults (aged 18+) with T2DM (A1c >7% [53 mmol/mol]). The control group (n=40) will receive usual care (UC). The two intervention groups (n=40 each) will receive UC plus a F&V Rx that is either independent of DSME/S attendance (F&V Rx alone) or dependent on DSME/S attendance (F&V Rx + DSME/S). First, the investigators will systematically explore the impact of a F&V Rx on uptake and retention in DSME/S. Next, the investigators will explore changes in A1c, and diet-related outcomes. Finally, with implementation in mind, the investigators will use Proctor's implementation taxonomy, and the cultural adaptation framework from Castro et al., to assess program appropriateness, acceptability, and sustainability with both participants and clinical care providers. The study team and the Community Advisory Board (CAB) have the research, clinical expertise, and established retail network necessary to conduct a F&V Rx trial in a low-income, Hispanic community. The findings of this trial will inform the design of a future, fully powered RCT and address gaps in knowledge related to how F&V Rx programs impact T2DM-related outcomes. If effective, F&V Rx programs have the potential to improve diabetes self-management and reduce the clinical burden of poor glycemic control, particularly in low-income, Hispanic communities.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Reading, Pennsylvania, United States, 19601
        • Penn State Health St. Joseph Downtown Campus
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient at Penn State Health St. Joe's Medical Center
  • Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus greater than or equal to six months
  • A1c level is greater than or equal to 7% (53 mmol/mol)
  • Low income defined as enrolled in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), is uninsured or have Medicaid, or identifying as food insecure based on USDA criteria.
  • Ability to give a blood sample
  • Willing to respond to contacts from study staff over the study period
  • Willing and able to give informed consent
  • Can read and write in English or Spanish

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus less than six months
  • Patients who have previously participated in the Veggie Rx program in the past year
  • Patients who have attended any diabetes self-management education and support (DSME/S) sessions in the past year
  • Women who are pregnant or who plan to become pregnant during the study period
  • Any uncontrolled mental illness or substance abuse, or inpatient treatment for these in the past six months
  • Any unstable or significant medical condition in the past 3 months (e.g. recent heart attack, stroke, DVT)
  • A1c level is less than 7%
  • Does not speak English or Spanish
  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Unable to give a blood sample

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Usual Care Control Group
Will receive usual care
Visit with a primary care provider and referral for diabetes self-management education and support (DSME/S) sessions
Active Comparator: F&V Rx Alone Group
Will receive 4 monthly F&V Rx vouchers regardless of their DSME/S attendance.
Usual Care plus four F&V prescriptions that are independent of DSME/S attendance
Active Comparator: F&V Rx + DSME/S Group
Will receive monthly F&V Rx vouchers starting at the first group session and they will receive additional F&V Rx vouchers only when they attend a monthly DSME/S group (up to 4 total)
Usual Care plus four F&V prescriptions that are dependent on DSME/S attendance

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the impact of a F&V Rx on DSME/S uptake in low-income adults
Time Frame: Throughout the 16 week intervention
Defined as the number of participants who attend any 1 DSME (# attend any 1 DSME/S session/total # randomized)
Throughout the 16 week intervention
Evaluate the impact of a F&V Rx on DSME/S retention in low-income adults.
Time Frame: Throughout the 16 week intervention
Defined as % who attend >=75% of sessions (# attend >= 75% sessions/ # attended any 1 DSME/S session)
Throughout the 16 week intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the impact of a F&V Rx on A1c (% and mg/dL)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and follow up (week 16)
Blood biomarker assessment will be taken and analyzed by the Penn State Health Clinical Labs.
Baseline (week 0) and follow up (week 16)
Evaluate the impact of a F&V Rx on Diabetes Self-Management
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and follow up (week 16)
Measured by DSME questionnaire
Baseline (week 0) and follow up (week 16)
Evaluate the impact of a F&V Rx on Fruit and Vegetable Intake
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and follow up (week 16)
Based on the 24-hour recalls
Baseline (week 0) and follow up (week 16)
Evaluate the impact of a F&V Rx on Healthy Eating index-2015
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and follow up (week 16)
Based on the 24-hour recalls
Baseline (week 0) and follow up (week 16)
Evaluate the impact of a F&V Rx on Total plasma carotenoids (ng/mL)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and follow up (week 16)
Plasma carotenoids will be separated into the total and five individual concentrations (α-carotene, β-carotene, lutein, lycopene, and cryptoxanthin) using high-performance liquid chromatography methodology using our Sciex Exion LC-Sciex QTRAP 6500+ mass spectrometry system.
Baseline (week 0) and follow up (week 16)
Evaluate the impact of a F&V Rx on Food insecurity
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0) and follow up (week 16)
Measured by the 18-item USDA Food Insecurity Questionnaire
Baseline (week 0) and follow up (week 16)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess program implementation outcomes - Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Time Frame: Throughout the 16 week intervention and follow-up
A four-item measure implementation outcomes to assess acceptability of the DSME/S sessions and the overall intervention for participants.
Throughout the 16 week intervention and follow-up
Assess program implementation outcomes - Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
Time Frame: Throughout the 16 week intervention and follow-up
A four-item measure of implementation to assess the appropriateness of the DSME/S sessions and the overall intervention for participants.
Throughout the 16 week intervention and follow-up
Assess program implementation outcomes - Clinic/providers/staff - Implementation Outcomes Questionnaire (IOQ)
Time Frame: Throughout the 16 week intervention and follow-up
Survey that measures implementation success of the intervention from the perspective of stakeholders who carry out the daily operations
Throughout the 16 week intervention and follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Susan Veldheer, DEd, RD, Penn State College of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 30, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 23681
  • R01DK132077-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on Usual Care

3
Subscribe