Operative Versus Non-operative Treatment for Mild to Moderate Hallux Valgus Deformity

January 18, 2024 updated by: Marius Molund, Ostfold Hospital Trust

Randomised Controlled Trial; Is Operative Treatment of Mild to Moderate Hallux Valgus Deformity Superior to Conservative Treatment?

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to investigate operative treatment versus conservative treatment in participants suffering from mild to moderate hallux valgus deformity. The main question it aims to answer are; Is surgery superior to conservative treatment?

The participants will be randomized in to two groups, operative and conservative group.

Investigators will compare the groups measuring the clinical results using the patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOxFQ), Visual analog scale (VAS), likert scale 0-5. Participants will be observed for a period og two years.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating the patient reported outcome after operative or conservative treatment in mild to moderate hallux valgus deformity. In this RCT study participants will be divided into operative group, non-operative group where the treatment will be orthopedic aids/wide shoes. The participants will be evaluated 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after starting the treatment. The clinical results will be evaluated using patient reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Primary aim: Investigating the clinical result by PROM (Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire)

Secondary aim: Investigating the radiological results according to newer and traditional parameters. Operative group -correction achieved, residual rate. Conservative group -progression of deformity.

Statistical power calculations have been made within the research group. Calculations are based on the main outcome MOxFQ, with the power of 80 and confidence interval 95%. We concluded that a sample size of 49 participants will be needed to perform a regression analysis. To account for loss to follow-up (estimated 20%) we will recruit 120 participants (60 per group).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Painful Hallux Valgus deformity
  • Hallux Valgus Angle <35 degrees
  • Intermetatarsal angle <15 degrees
  • 18-80 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Advanced osteoarthritis in first metatarsophalangeal joint
  • Rheumatic diseases
  • Pregnancy
  • Drug abuse
  • Severe psychological disorder
  • Lack of compliance
  • Language barrier

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Operation
60 participants will be operated for mild to moderate hallux valgus deformity
60 participants will receive the traditional operative treatment for the deformity. Participants will be followed for 2 years.
Other: Conservative
60 participants will be treated conservatively with a wide shoe
60 participants will receive conservative treatment with orthopedic aid/wide shoe. Participants will be followed for 2 years.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical results MOxFQ
Time Frame: 2 years
Manchester oxford foot questionnaire (MOxFQ) (Raw scores can be converted to a 0-100 metric where 100=most severe)
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical result SF-36
Time Frame: 2 years
Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) (0=worst to 100=best)
2 years
Clinical result VAS
Time Frame: 2 years
Visual analogue scale (VAS) 0-10 (0=best to 10=worst)
2 years
Clinical result Likert scale
Time Frame: 2 years
Likert scale 0-5 (0=worst to 5=best)
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marius Molund, Ostfold Hospital Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 2, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hallux Valgus Deformity

3
Subscribe