Computer Guided Placement of Zygomatic Implants in Two Different Approaches

February 6, 2024 updated by: Abdulrahman Adnan Aldakka, Cairo University

Evaluation of Computer Guided Placement of Zygomatic Implants for Reconstruction of Atrophic Maxilla Utilizing Two Different Approaches: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Evaluation of computer guided placement of Zygomatic implants utilizing intra sinus versus extra sinus surgical approach for the reconstruction of atrophic maxilla. The expected benefit from the current study is to select the most suitable approach for Zygomatic implant placement with the least postoperative complications

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

During the last ten years, there has been an increase in the number of edentulous patients looking for and seeking out rehabilitation. Formerly, individuals with edentulous maxilla and mandibles were rehabilitated with removable complete dentures, but it was associated with poor patients' satisfaction.

Alveolar bone atrophy results from loss of bony support due to the physiological process that naturally takes place after tooth loss, especially in the upper arch. Due to its shape and structure, the maxilla is an extremely challenging arch to reconstruct with dental implants.

Oral and Maxillofacial surgeons began utilizing alternative methods to replace missing teeth with osseointegrated dental implants in atrophic maxilla. As a result, different methods were developed for handling of this issue, including tilted implants, sinus elevation, the use of Pterygoid implants, the use of short implants and Zygomatic implants.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

11

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 12311
        • Recruiting
        • Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with severely atrophic edentulous upper arch (Cawood class IV, V, VI) that could not be restored by other type of treatment
  2. Patients who had at least 8-12 mm vertical bone height in anterior maxilla to allow installation of 2 conventional implants.
  3. Lacking posterior maxillary bone support due to significant sinus pneumatistion
  4. Good systemic health (ASA score I-II)
  5. Highly motivated patients.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient not willing to give his/her informed consent.
  2. Patients with systemic disease that did not permit the surgical procedure (including general anaesthesia).
  3. Patients with uncontrolled diabetes or under bisphosphonate therapy.
  4. Heavy smoker.(> 20 cigarettes daily)
  5. Patient with psychiatric problems, severe bruxism or other parafunctional habits.
  6. Acute sinusitis.
  7. Malignancy or pathology in Maxilla or Zygoma.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Computer guided intra sinus approach for Zygomatic implant placement.

After reflection of mucoperiosteal flap then the non-working tip of the coarse diamond bur will be inserted till the initial marking point and further preparation of osteotomy site will be performed along the lateral wall of maxillary sinus then sinus membrane will be reflected gently to get easily access for 3.5 mm drill or 4-4.5 mm diameter Zygomatic implant. The surgical stent will be inserted inside the patient's mouth; it will be adapted and held in place by the anchoring screws to Zygoma and osteotomy will progressively widened by using standard 2.9 mm diameter drill and 3.5 mm twist diameter drill.

Depth indicator will be used to determine the length of Zygomatic implant. Zygomatic implant will be placed.

The platform of Zygomatic implant will be emerged over and close to the top of the crest of the residual alveolar ridge near to first molar region. Closure will done with 3-0 silk suture.

the ideal way to support implant-based restorative procedures for full and partially edentulous patients who are missing bone in the upper posterior maxilla.
Active Comparator: Computer guided extra sinus approach for Zygomatic implant placement.

After adequate exposure of surgical The surgical stent will inserted inside the patient's mouth; it will adapted and held in place by the anchoring screws to Zygoma and osteotomy will progressively widened by using standard 2.9 mm diameter drill and 3.5 mm twist diameter drill.

Depth indicator will be used to determine the length of Zygomatic implant. Zygomatic implant that will placed.

The platform of Zygomatic implant will be emerged over and close to the top of the crest of the residual alveolar ridge near to first molar region. Closure will done with 3-0 silk suture.

the ideal way to support implant-based restorative procedures for full and partially edentulous patients who are missing bone in the upper posterior maxilla.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: operation day and first week
1-10
operation day and first week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Crestal bone loss around zygomatic implants
Time Frame: after 6 months
To measure the crestal bone loss around Zygomatic implant by CBCT.
after 6 months
Post operative complications
Time Frame: 1st week , first month , third month and sixth month
Assessment of the incidence of the postoperative complications in the two groups.
1st week , first month , third month and sixth month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 4, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrophic Maxilla

Clinical Trials on Zygomatic implants

3
Subscribe