Safety and Efficacy of Carbon Dioxide Gas for Endoscopy

January 30, 2024 updated by: Chinenye Dike, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Safety and Efficacy of Carbon Dioxide Gas for Endoscopic Insufflation in Children

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of air versus carbon dioxide gas insufflation for endoscopy in children.

The main question[s] it aims to answer are:

•to determine safety of CO2 Assess patient comfort (abdominal pain, flatulence and bloating) with CO2 use when compared to air.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In this study, children (6 months -18 years) undergoing all endoscopic procedures that includes an upper endoscopy including but not limited to Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD/ upper endoscopy), EGD/ Colonoscopy, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) e.t.c after appropriate consent, will be randomized 1:1 to either Air or CO2 gas for endoscopic insufflation. We will record demographics (name, age, sex, MRN, race/ethnicity), anthropometrics including weight, height/length, weight for length (WFL), WFL z score, BMI, BMI z score, indication/ reason for scope, other co-morbidities (other medical problems), personnel involved (faculty only, vs faculty + trainee), minute by minute end tidal CO2 levels, minute by minute minute ventilation levels, baseline blood pCO2, and blood pCO2 after each procedure. Pre and post procedure patient reported abdominal pain, bloating and flatulence. Pre and post procedure nurse assessed pain. Pre and post procedure vital signs. Patients will be randomized using a sealed envelope method by the endoscopy technician. Both patients and providers will be blinded to arm of enrollment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

350

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Chinenye R Dike, MD MS
  • Phone Number: 205 638 9918
  • Email: cdike@uabmc.edu

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • Recruiting
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Infants and children 6 months to 18 years undergoing any upper endoscopy related procedure including but not limited to EGD/Colonoscopy, ERCP, EGD only, EUS, EGD with foreign body removal, Enteroscopy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Physical Status Classification System of 4 and above
  • Children with chronic lung disease,
  • Children who are wards of the state will be excluded.
  • Children needing language interpreting services that is not Spanish.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Air
Carbon dioxide gas versus air for endoscopic insufflation
Experimental: Carbondioxide
Carbon dioxide gas versus air for endoscopic insufflation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Abdominal Pain
Time Frame: baseline/ pre-procedure to immediately after the procedure
Rates of abdominal pain from pre-procedure to immediately after the procedure
baseline/ pre-procedure to immediately after the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PCO2 level
Time Frame: baseline/ preprocedural to immediately after the procedure
Incidence of elevated carbon dioxide level in the blood from pre-procedure to post -procedure
baseline/ preprocedural to immediately after the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 24, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 24, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB-300011252

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Abdominal Pain

Clinical Trials on Endoscopic insufflation gas

3
Subscribe