Retrospective Observational Study of Implant-supported Restorations With Dental Implants.

March 11, 2024 updated by: M3 Health

Retrospective Observational Study of Implant-supported Restorations With Implants Produced by Additive Manufacturing

This retrospective study aims to value the bone loss and the success and survival of the dental implants produced by additive manufacturing installed in an area grafted with Plenum® Osshp (synthetic bone graft). In addition, the biological and biomechanical performance of implant restorations supported through an observational retrospective solution will be observed. From 50 to 100 survey participants will be selected, who will be invited to attend the clinic for clinical, radiographic, and prosthetic evaluation and successful parameters between baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. The data obtained regarding bone loss (primary outcome) of the analyzed regions and implant success and survival in area grafted with Plenum® Osshp (secondary outcome) will be evaluated by the paired t-test for the evaluation of the times (3, 6, and 12 months) and survival curves of the installed dental implants.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sao Paulo
      • Guarulhos, Sao Paulo, Brazil
        • University of Guarulhos

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Clinical parameters:

  • Presence or absence of pain or tenderness
  • Presence or absence of suppuration or exudation
  • Presence or absence of mobility

Prosthetic parameters

- Presence or absence of mechanical complications (problems in prefabricated components such as screws and abutments).

Radiographic Parameters

  • Presence or absence of peri-implant radiolucidity.
  • maintenance and quality of the bone graft volume in the grafted area to each clinical indication: ridge augmentation, extraction sites (socket preservation or dental implant preparation/placement) and sinus lifting.
  • Distance between the shoulder of the implant and the first visible bone contact (in mm).
  • Presence or absence of technical complications such as fracture or loss of porcelain structures.

Success Parameters

  • Absence of pain or tenderness.
  • Absence of suppuration or exudation.
  • Clinical absence of implant mobility.
  • Absence of peri-implant radiolucency.
  • Minor loss of up to 1.5mm in the first year of function.
  • Absence of mechanical or technical complications in the dental implant and in the prosthesis to the dental implants installed in an area grafted.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • N/A

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dental Implants installed in an grafted area (sinus lifting)
Dental implants produced by additive manufacturing installed in an area grafted with synthetic bone graft (Plenum® Osshp) - sinus lifting.
The patient will be invited to participate in the clinic to assess radiographic bone loss and clinical follow-up for 12 months.
Other Names:
  • maxillary sinus lift
Experimental: Dental Implants installed in an grafted area (ridge augmentation)
Dental implants produced by additive manufacturing installed in an area grafted with synthetic bone graft (Plenum® Osshp) - ridge augmentation.
The patient will be invited to participate in the clinic to assess radiographic bone loss and clinical follow-up for 12 months.
Other Names:
  • Guided bone regeneration
Experimental: Dental Implants installed in an grafted area (extraction sites)
Dental implants produced by additive manufacturing installed in an area grafted with synthetic bone graft (Plenum® Osshp) - extraction sites (socket preservation or dental implant preparation/placement).
The patient will be invited to participate in the clinic to assess radiographic bone loss and clinical follow-up for 12 months.
Other Names:
  • Guided bone regeneration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The survival rate of dental implants produced by additive manufacturing installed in pristine bone and grafted areas with synthetic bone graft (Plenum® Osshp).
Time Frame: 12 months
The main outcome is the survival rate (%) of successful implant-supported restoration after at least 1-year of occlusal loading (less than 0.5mm of bone loss)
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The survival rate of dental implants produced by additive manufacturing installed in different areas grafted with synthetic bone grafts (Plenum® Osshp)
Time Frame: 12 months
Survival rate (%) of successful implant-supported restorations (less than 0.5mm of bone loss) placed in different bone areas (pristine bone, grafted areas with Plenum Oss including maxillary sinus augmentation, guided bone regeneration for both vertical and horizontal augmentation, and extraction sockets).
12 months
Rate of bone loss
Time Frame: 12 months
A periapical x-ray will be performed at the implant placement region to check the bone level concerning the implant platform. Then, a vertical line will be drawn from the initial line to the bone level for measurement (mm). Standardized intraoral periapical radiographs will be obtained using a dental X-ray machine with a 35 cm long cone. The exposure parameter was 70 kV (Peak), 15mA, and 1/4s at a focus-sensor distance of 30cm. The X-rays will be captured with a digital camera and transferred to a personal computer. Image processing software will be used to store the scanned images. Subsequently, the images will be made available on a monitor and a linear measurement will be performed with software.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jamil A Shibli, PhD, University of Guarulhos, UnG

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Plenum Oss 002

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Oral Surgical Procedures

Clinical Trials on Dental Implants installed in an grafted area (sinus lifting)

3
Subscribe