High-frequency Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation Versus Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Treatment of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain

November 28, 2023 updated by: Fan BiFa

A Multicentre Clinical Study of High-frequency Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation Versus Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Treatment of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain

Application of High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation (HF-SCS) in the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (PDPN): A multicenter, randomized controlled study comparing its clinical efficacy with traditional spinal cord stimulation for PDPN. The study aims to observe the impact of HF-SCS on the neurological function and microcirculation of PDPN patients, elucidating the correlation between the underlying diabetes and the efficacy of HF-SCS therapy on PDPN. The goal is to enhance the treatment standards for PDPN, improve the quality of life for this population, and overall treatment outcomes. Simultaneously, the study aims to contribute evidence-based medicine for the mechanistic exploration of PDPN.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosed with diabetes, aged between 18 and 80 years old;
  2. Symmetrical pain in the distal lower extremities with or without dysesthesia;
  3. Duration of symptoms exceeding 6 months;
  4. Pain described as stabbing and/or electric shock-like and/or burning sensation;
  5. Abnormal Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST);
  6. Presence of hyperalgesia and allodynia;
  7. Absence of lower limb reflexes and muscle strength abnormalities;
  8. Normal MRI or CT scans without spinal canal stenosis or other spinal abnormalities.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Concurrent severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases;
  2. History of lumbar spine surgery, trauma, or spinal canal stenosis within the past 6 months, or a history of lumbar spine surgery, trauma, or spinal canal stenosis that would impact the SCS surgery and pain assessment in this study;
  3. Presence of radicular symptoms;
  4. Other spinal abnormalities, such as benign or malignant tumors, congenital abnormalities of the spine, spinal instability, etc.;
  5. Coexisting disorders of the coagulation system, malignant tumors, infections, and psychiatric or psychological disorders;
  6. Pregnancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: spinal cord stimulation
A spinal cord stimulator is an implanted device that sends low levels of electricity directly into the spinal cord to relieve pain.
Experimental: high frequency spinal cord stimulation
A spinal cord stimulator is an implanted device that sends low levels and high frequency of electricity directly into the spinal cord to relieve pain.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
treatment effectiveness
Time Frame: 3months
The treatment effectiveness is assessed based on the reduction of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores for pain three months after treatment compared to before treatment. Specifically, a decrease of ≥50% in the pain NRS score [(NRS score at 3 months post-treatment - NRS score before treatment) / NRS score before treatment] ≥ 50% is considered the criterion for treatment effectiveness
3months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: BiFa Fan, master, China-Japan Friendship Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

November 27, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 28, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2023

First Posted (Estimated)

December 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Time Frame

2023/1/1-2025/12/31

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Clinical Trials on spinal cord stimulator

3
Subscribe