Upfront EUS CGN/CPN vs Conventional Step up Approach for Inoperable Painful Pancreatic Cancer

November 29, 2023 updated by: CHAN SHANNON MELISSA, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Upfront Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Celiac Ganglion Neurolysis Versus Conventional Step-up Approach for Patients With Painful, Inoperable Pancreatic Cancer

Patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer are often demoralized by intractable, persistent and incapacitating pain. It must be managed aggressively and strong opioids are recommended as the mainstay of treatment. However, patients develop opioid-related adverse effects. EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) and celiac ganglion neurolysis (CGN) has been shown to provide high efficacy for pain control. The optimal timing, however, is in debate.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

94

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age >= 18 years old
  2. Diagnosed to have inoperable pancreatic cancer
  3. Presence of tumor pain (centrally located, constant, with no other obvious cause) with a VAS >= 3
  4. Karnofsky performance status >= 60
  5. Planned for EUS examination and/or biopsy of the pancreatic tumor

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Allergy to bupivacaine, or alcohol
  2. Potentially operable after neoadjuvant therapy
  3. Expected survival of less than 3 months
  4. Patient who is already on opioids for pain control
  5. Previous percutaneous or EUS-guided CGN/ CPN
  6. Recurrent pancreatic tumors after operation
  7. Uncorrectable coagulopathy
  8. Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: EUS-guided coeliac ganglion neurolysis / celiac plexus neurolysis

Patient would undergo a EUS diagnostic procedure with or without a biopsy. Patient would be blinded to the group they were assigned. The procedure will be performed with a linear array echoendoscope (EUS) under conscious sedation or monitored anaesthesia care.

For cases in which celiac ganglia could not be visualized, EUS-guided coeliac plexus neurolysis (CPN) will be performed.

The EUS scope was first inserted into the stomach, and the coeliac trunk was visualized by scanning from the lesser curve of the gastric body. After visualization, the scope was rotated clockwise, enabling visualization and identification of the left adrenal gland. The coeliac ganglia are often seen to the left of the coeliac artery, between the aorta and the left adrenal gland, at the level between the coeliac artery and the left adrenal artery. They are also visualized cephalad to the coeliac artery in some cases. Hypoechoic nodular structures linked by hypoechoic threads residing in the periphery of this region were defined as the coeliac ganglia . A 19G or 22G needle was used for puncture of the CGN. After confirming the lack of backflow of blood with aspiration, a mixture of 5ml of 0.25-0.5% bupivacaine and 5ml absolute alcohol was injected.

For cases in which celiac ganglia could not be visualized, EUS-guided coeliac plexus neurolysis (CPN) will be performed.

Active Comparator: Conventional step-up approach

Patient would undergo a EUS diagnostic procedure with or without a biopsy. Patient would be blinded to the group they were assigned. The concept of the conventional step-up approach is to follow ESMO clinical practice guidelines for cancer pain.

In case of inadequate pain control, the analgesics will be stepped up according to the guidelines. After 4 weeks, if patient's VAS score more than 7 or VAS score fails to improve by 20% despite optimal oral analgesics, patients are given the option of EUS-guided CGN/ CPN.

The EUS scope was first inserted into the stomach, and the coeliac trunk was visualized by scanning from the lesser curve of the gastric body. After visualization, the scope was rotated clockwise, enabling visualization and identification of the left adrenal gland. The coeliac ganglia are often seen to the left of the coeliac artery, between the aorta and the left adrenal gland, at the level between the coeliac artery and the left adrenal artery. They are also visualized cephalad to the coeliac artery in some cases. Hypoechoic nodular structures linked by hypoechoic threads residing in the periphery of this region were defined as the coeliac ganglia . A 19G or 22G needle was used for puncture of the CGN. After confirming the lack of backflow of blood with aspiration, a mixture of 5ml of 0.25-0.5% bupivacaine and 5ml absolute alcohol was injected.

For cases in which celiac ganglia could not be visualized, EUS-guided coeliac plexus neurolysis (CPN) will be performed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The mean change in VAS pain score at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months
The mean change in VAS pain score at 3 months when compared to baseline (pre-procedure) between upfront EUS group and conventional step-up group
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The mean percentage and absolute change in VAS pain score at 1 month
Time Frame: 1 month
The mean percentage and absolute change in VAS pain score at 1 month when compared to baseline (pre-procedure)
1 month
The mean percentage in VAS pain score at 3 month
Time Frame: 3 months
The mean percentage in VAS pain score at 3 month when compared to baseline (pre-procedure)
3 months
Short form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2
Time Frame: 3 months
The absolute and mean percentage change in Short form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2
3 months
Brief Pain Inventory
Time Frame: 3 months
The absolute and mean percentage change in Brief Pain Inventory
3 months
Morphine equivalent (MEQ) consumption
Time Frame: 3 months
Absolute use and percentage change of morphine (expressed in morphine equivalent (MEQ) consumption) when compared to baseline
3 months
Common opioid-related adverse effects
Time Frame: 3 months
Common opioid-related adverse effects including nausea, pruritus, constipation and drowsiness will be recorded
3 months
Quality of life
Time Frame: 3 months
Changes of the score in quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30)
3 months
Karnofsky performance status
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Karnofsky performance status at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
12 weeks
Adverse events from the EUS-guided CGN/CPN
Time Frame: 7 days
Adverse events from the EUS-guided CGN/CPN will be recorded
7 days
Breakthrough visits
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Breakthrough visits in between the 4 weeks
4 weeks
Need for and timing EUS-guided CGN/CPN for the conventional group
Time Frame: 3months
Need for and timing EUS-guided CGN/CPN for the conventional group will be recorded
3months
Overall survival
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Date of death will be recorded
48 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Cancer Non-resectable

Clinical Trials on EUS-guided coeliac ganglion neurolysis / celiac plexus neurolysis

3
Subscribe