The Effectiveness of the "MINDLiNG" Digital Mental Health Intervention

December 11, 2023 updated by: 40FY

A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personality Trait-focused Digital Mental Health Intervention

A study in South Korea assessed the effectiveness of the "MINDLiNG" digital mental healthcare program, targeting maladaptive personality traits, and found significant improvements in reducing stress, perfectionism, loneliness, and anxiety, while increasing self-esteem among participants. The study highlights the potential of digital solutions to address the high demand for mental healthcare services in South Korea.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a digital intervention program called "MINDLiNG" designed to target maladaptive personality traits, with four subprograms addressing perfectionism, low self-esteem, social isolation, and anxiety. Participants were assigned to one of these programs, and primary outcome measures varied accordingly, including the Perceived Stress Scale, Hewitt Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale, State Self-Esteem Scale, UCLA Loneliness Scale, and Beck Anxiety Inventory. The study anticipated treatment effects in both primary and secondary outcome measures for the treatment group compared to the waitlist group after 5 and 10 weeks of intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults between the ages of 18 and 60
  • Experiencing a moderate level of stress in their daily lives (PSS≥17) and meet a certain level of perfectionism (HMPS≥198), self-esteem (SSES≤57), loneliness (UCLA LS≥47), and anxiety (BAI≥16). The cutoff points for each scale are based on the top or bottom 25% of the frequency distribution suggested in the previous study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • In cases where there is difficulty understanding and reading Korean.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment group
Adults between the ages of 18 and 60 were recruited and randomly assigned to the treatment group and waitlist group in the ratio of 2:1. Based on the screening results, 75 participants were assigned to each of the four intervention programs within MINDLiNG (Riggy, Pleaser, Shelly, and Jumpy).
The intervention was delivered on an online platform set up separately for the study, which was accessible via the web browser and application. The psychological intervention program for maladaptive personality traits (Mindling) is based on the principles of CBT, psychological schema therapy, acceptance-commitment therapy, and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, and is aimed primarily at adults to prevent and overcome psychological difficulties
No Intervention: Waitlist group
Adults between the ages of 18 and 60 were recruited and randomly assigned to the treatment group and waitlist group in the ratio of 2:1. Based on the screening results, 25 participants were assigned to each of the four intervention programs waitlist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: The treatment group was assessed at Weeks 0, 5, 10, and 14, and the waitlist group at Weeks 0, 5, and 10
The primary outcome measure for the entirety of the MINDLiNG program. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a 10-item scale that can range from 0 to 40, which measures the perceived stress on a 5-point severity with higher scores indicating more severe perceived stress.
The treatment group was assessed at Weeks 0, 5, 10, and 14, and the waitlist group at Weeks 0, 5, and 10
Hewitt Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale
Time Frame: The Riggy treatment group was assessed at Weeks 0, 5, 10, and 14, and the waitlist group at Weeks 0, 5, and 10

Perfectionism, the primary outcome of the Riggy program, was measured using the Hewitt Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (HMPS).

The HMPS is a 45-item measure with three trait subscales measuring self-oriented perfectionism, other-oriented perfectionism, and socially prescribed perfectionism. It ranges from 45 to 315. Higher level means higher level of perfectionism.

The Riggy treatment group was assessed at Weeks 0, 5, 10, and 14, and the waitlist group at Weeks 0, 5, and 10
State Self-Esteem Scale
Time Frame: The Pleaser treatment group was assessed at Weeks 0, 5, 10, and 14, and the waitlist group at Weeks 0, 5, and 10
State self-esteem, the primary outcome of the Pleaser program, was measured using the Sate Self-Esteem Scale (SSES) SSES is a 20-item scale on a 5-point likert scale ranging from 20 to 100, assessing 3 facets of self-esteem: appearance, performance, and social. Higher score means higher level of self-esteem.
The Pleaser treatment group was assessed at Weeks 0, 5, 10, and 14, and the waitlist group at Weeks 0, 5, and 10
UCLA Loneliness Scale
Time Frame: The Shelly treatment group was assessed at Weeks 0, 5, 10, and 14, and the waitlist group at Weeks 0, 5, and 10

Loneliness, the primary outcome of the Shelly program, was measured using the UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA-LS).

UCLA-LS is a 20-item scale to measure subjective feelings of loneliness as well as feelings of social isolation on a 4-point likert scale ranging from 20 to 80. Higher score means higher level of loneliness.

The Shelly treatment group was assessed at Weeks 0, 5, 10, and 14, and the waitlist group at Weeks 0, 5, and 10
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Time Frame: The Jumpy treatment group was assessed at Weeks 0, 5, 10, and 14, and the waitlist group at Weeks 0, 5, and 10
The primary measure of the Jumpy program was the BAI. A 21-item self-inventory on a 4-point likert scale ranging from 0 to 63, measuring common somatic and cognitive symptoms of anxiety. Higher score means higher level of anxiety
The Jumpy treatment group was assessed at Weeks 0, 5, 10, and 14, and the waitlist group at Weeks 0, 5, and 10

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-Efficacy Stress (SES)
Time Frame: The treatment group was assessed at Weeks 0, 5, 10, and 14, and the waitlist group at Weeks 0, 5, and 10
A measure for entirety of the MINDLiNG program. The SES is a 23-item scale that assesses the individuals self-efficacy on a 5-point likert scale ranging from 23 to 115. Higher scores indicate higher level of self-efficacy.
The treatment group was assessed at Weeks 0, 5, 10, and 14, and the waitlist group at Weeks 0, 5, and 10
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Time Frame: The treatment group was assessed at Weeks 0, 5, 10, and 14, and the waitlist group at Weeks 0, 5, and 10
A measure for entirety of the MINDLiNG program. The CES-D is a 20-item questionnaire that measures depressive symptoms on a 4-point likert scale ranging from 0 to 60. Higher score means higher level of depression.
The treatment group was assessed at Weeks 0, 5, 10, and 14, and the waitlist group at Weeks 0, 5, and 10
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) trait
Time Frame: The treatment group was assessed at Weeks 0, 5, 10, and 14, and the waitlist group at Weeks 0, 5, and 10
A measure for entirety of the MINDLiNG program. The STAI trait is a 20-item inventory that measures trait anxiety on a 4-point likert scale ranging from 20 to 80. Higher score means higher anxiety.
The treatment group was assessed at Weeks 0, 5, 10, and 14, and the waitlist group at Weeks 0, 5, and 10

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Min-Sup Shin, PhD, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 23, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 12, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SNUH_MINDLiNG_RCT

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Personality

Clinical Trials on "MINDLiNG" Digital Mental Health Intervention

3
Subscribe