Preparing Older Adults for Major Surgery With Preoperative Comprehensive Geriatric Assessments

March 5, 2024 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison

Preparing Older Adults for Major Abdominal Surgery: a Systems Engineering Approach to Implement Preoperative Comprehensive Geriatric Assessments

The researchers will conduct observations, interviews, and focus groups with clinicians, staff and patients of the Perioperative Optimization of Senior Health (POSH) clinic, which conducts preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessments (pCGA) at UW Health to understand clinic processes and potential areas for improvement. The goal is to (1) create a process map describing clinic workflow and (2) redesign the process with healthcare providers and patients/families.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Aim 1: Process mapping using direct observation, interviews and focus groups to identify opportunities for system redesign

The research team will directly observe n=30 patients in POSH clinic visits, taking notes and documenting the persons, tasks, tools/technologies, environment and organizational factors affecting healthcare delivery. Observer notes will be supplemented with audio recording of the clinic visit. Observations will also include assessments performed by social workers, pharmacist, medical assistants.

Semi-structured qualitative interviews with patients who participated in the observations and their caregivers, if any, will be conducted 2 weeks after the pCGA visit. Interviewers will assess barriers, facilitators, motivation, and adherence to tasks, and reflections on the process of scheduling, attending and participating in the clinic. Surgeons who refer patients (n=20) will be interviewed using semi-structured guides to elicit feedback on the process map and explore perceived barriers and facilitators to adoption of the pCGA.

Focus Groups: Healthcare professionals and staff (n=20) who conduct the pcga will participate in a focus group to provide feedback on the process map. The researchers will elicit feedback on the process map, clarifying its accuracy as a representation of the tasks and procedures performed, and identifying system-level barriers and facilitators at each step.

Aim 2: Co-design an implementation package for the pCGA at (2a) a large academic hospital and (2b) an affiliate community site.

The research team will apply user-centered participatory design methods to adapt the process map (aim 1) into an implementation package, which consists of a set of implementation strategies, to address barriers and enhance facilitators at each step. Participatory design (also called "co-design") is a systems engineering approach where the researchers and participants work together in designing the workflow of an intervention. Co-design sessions will be conducted in parallel at our University Hospital (2a) and a local affiliated community hospital (2b). There will be two groups (design teams) of patients/caregivers and healthcare professionals per location, for a total of four groups.

This study will include five co-design videoconference sessions with up to n=10 members in each group (total n=40) over approximately 6 months, with 2-3 weeks between each session. Each session will last 90 minutes. The sessions will identify process changes that can address barriers and facilitators to promote implementation of the pCGA. The research team will analyze audio recordings and notes from each session. These findings will be synthesized and presented at the next design session. Each design team will participate in sessions independently, however, the research team will summarize output from each session and provide this content to the alternate design team for comment.

Design sessions are expected to generate an implementation package that is ready for feasibility and pilot testing at the University hospital. Design sessions at the community site will serve as a template for implementation at a future date.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53792
        • UW Hospital and Clinics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Observations and Interviews in the Perioperative Optimization of Senior Health (POSH) clinic.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being a patient seen for a pCGA clinic at the time of observations, or being the caregiver of such a patient.
  • Being a clinician or staff member working at the pCGA clinic
  • Being a surgeon who frequently refers patients to the pCGA clinic

Exclusion Criteria:

  • For patients:

    • not being fluent in English
    • having an enacted power of attorney indicating that the patient is unable to make medical decisions for themselves and a legally authorized representative (LAR) does not attend the pCGA visit with the patient
  • For pCGA clinicians and staff: none
  • For surgeons: none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients and caregivers
Patients attending the Perioperative Optimization of Senior Health (POSH) clinic
Direct observations of the POSH clinic visit.
Semi-structured interviews of patients and providers involved in the POSH clinic.
Participatory design, also called "co-design" is a systems engineering approach where the researchers and participants work together in designing the workflow of an intervention. There will be two groups (design teams) of patients/caregivers and healthcare professionals per location, for a total of four groups.
Healthcare providers
Healthcare providers referring to or working in the Perioperative Optimization of Senior Health (POSH) clinic
Direct observations of the POSH clinic visit.
Semi-structured interviews of patients and providers involved in the POSH clinic.
Participatory design, also called "co-design" is a systems engineering approach where the researchers and participants work together in designing the workflow of an intervention. There will be two groups (design teams) of patients/caregivers and healthcare professionals per location, for a total of four groups.
Focus group of providers and staff who conduct the POSH clinic.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Process map
Time Frame: 12 months
The direct observations, interviews and focus groups conducted with patients and caregivers will help create a detailed process map of preoperative geriatric assessments. Specifically this map will detail the persons, tasks, tools/technologies, environment and organizational factors involved in the process according to the System Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model.
12 months
Implementation Package
Time Frame: 24 months
Co-design sessions will generate an implementation package, consisting of a set of implementation strategies, that can be piloted for its feasibility and adapted to facilitate preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment in other settings.
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Qualitative data: Barriers and Facilitators to preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessments
Time Frame: 5 years
The qualitative analysis performed of interviews and focus groups during process mapping will identify barriers and facilitators to the use of preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessments.
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Julia R Berian, MD, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 14, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 29, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2022-1516
  • A539707 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
  • SMPH/SURGERY/COLON RECT (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
  • 1K23AG081487-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • 2024-0044 [Aim 2] (Other Identifier: UW Madison)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Frailty

Clinical Trials on Process Mapping: Observations

3
Subscribe