Fecal Microbiota Transfer to Improve Diabetes Control Post-bariatric Surgery (DRIFTER)

December 21, 2023 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Obesity progresses worldwide with few effective treatments leading to a burst in Bariatric surgery (BS). France is the 3rd country in BS numbers yearly.

BS improves diabetes (T2D) and even induces diabetes remission (DR) in 60% of patients. Thus, an expert consensus recommended extending BS to T2D with BMI≥30kg/m² with uncontrolled glycaemia, anticipating even more BS. Glycaemic control further deteriorates in the longer term in non DR (NDR) patients and relapse occurs in some DR patients, urging the need to add new therapy to control glycaemia and provide new recommendations in the future.

Obesity and T2D are characterized by gut microbiota dysbiosis with low to very low microbial gene richness (MGR). About 75% of patients' candidates for BS are in the low MGR category. Whereas BS modifies microbiota composition and increases MGR 1-year post-BS, we demonstrated that only a few patients reach high MGR. Dysbiosis can be improved by several means; fibre enriched diet, prebiotics, probiotics also improve metabolic alterations and insulin resistance in mice. However, human studies observed rather divergent results: some studies display a beneficial effect in improving insulin-resistance but to a small extent while others do not display any significant effects at all. Therefore, other innovative strategies should be tested in humans. For example, Faecal microbiota transfer (FMT) ameliorates insulin sensitivity and MGR in metabolic syndrome patients, but was never tested in T2D nor post-BS. Whether adding such an innovative therapy to further modify gut microbiota post-BS can help improve glucose control should be tested.

FMT showed health benefits in several diseases (clostridium difficile (CD) and Crohn's). Until recently, FMT was performed using invasive tool (endoscopy or colonoscopy) thus with potential secondary effects, or enema yet maybe less effective. Recent technologic developments enabled to generate oral capsulized FMT (filled with fecal material) performing as well as invasive FMT for CD with good tolerance. This strategy has never been tested in obesity or T2D, whereas in metabolic syndrome patients (before T2D occurrence) and less severe dysbiosis, a proof-of-concept study showed that endoscopic FMT may improve insulin sensitivity after 6 weeks. Yet these studies have included a small number of patients, non T2D and did not test oral FMT. We here hypothesize that an intervention improving dysbiosis after 1-year post-BS might help improve/maintain diabetes control in the long-term. We will examine the effects of FMT (from lean healthy donors) vs. placebo transfer in dietary-controlled non-DR patients after 1-year post-BS, on Hba1c reduction evaluated 6 months' post-intervention

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

54

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria patients :

  • Adult patients from 18-65 years old
  • T2D patients any severity of initial T2D disease before BS
  • Who underwent Bariatric surgery (BS) 1 to 5 years before (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve, patients with pre-BS BMI≥35kg/m²)
  • Non-Diabetic remission (NDR) patients 1-year post-BS, defined as Hba1c>6.5% and/or fasting glycaemia>6.9mmol/l and/or receiving anti-diabetic drugs for at least 2 months. We will rather select patients with uncontrolled diabetes with Hba1c>7% and willing to receive proton pump inhibitor (PPI)
  • Patient compliant to 1rd year follow-up post-BS (who came to at least 2 among the three routine care follow-up visits during the first year (i.e. 3, 6 and 12M)
  • Signature of the informed consent
  • Affiliated to a social security regime (except AME)

Exclusion Criteria patients :

  • Type 1 diabetes
  • Patients receiving antibiotics (ATB) at the selection time or within the 3 previous months (if agreeing to participate to the study, the patients will be proposed randomization 3 months after stopping ATB)
  • Immunosuppressive therapy
  • Laxative treatments
  • DR since BS (nor relapse patients detailed further in the protocol)
  • Patients already recruited in another interventional studies study where a drug is being tested
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Patient with contemporary disease such as intestine disease
  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship
  • Patient deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision

Inclusion criteria donors:

  • Age ≥ 18 years and < 50 years
  • Lean individuals (18<BMI<25kg/m²)
  • Euglycemic: fasting glycemia <6mmol/l; Hba1c <5.9%
  • Healthy: no current drug prescription (except contraception or pain killers other than AINS)
  • Regular bowel movement in the morning defined as 1 stool/day at least
  • Signature of the informed consent
  • Subject with health insurance (except AME)

Exclusion criteria donors:

  • Familial history of obesity or diabetes and personal history of overweight/obesity
  • Infectious risk
  • Gastrointestinal disease
  • Exclusion criteria according screening test to National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (ANSM) recommendations
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding women
  • Subject under guardianship or curatorship
  • Subject deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
FMT (from healthy lean euglycemic non-obese donors)

1 FMT=30 capsulized FMT given during 2 days in several intakes per day (3 intakes per day).

FMT will be performed at baseline after randomization. Further treatment(s) will be given again at 6 and 12 weeks if we do not observe a change of Hba1c of at least -0.15% in patients who have Hba1c at inclusion <7%; of at least -0.4% in patients who have Hba1c at inclusion ≤8% and of at least -0.7% in patients who have Hba1c at inclusion >8%.

Placebo Comparator: 2
Placebo of FMT

1 Placebo of FMT=30 capsulized given during 2 days in several intakes per day (3 intakes per day).

Placebo of FMT will be performed at baseline after randomization. Further treatment(s) will be given again at 6 and 12 weeks if we do not observe a change of Hba1c of at least -0.15% in patients who have Hba1c at inclusion <7%; of at least -0.4% in patients who have Hba1c at inclusion ≤8% and of at least -0.7% in patients who have Hba1c at inclusion >8%.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Hba1c change from baseline to 6 months post randomization
Time Frame: At baseline and at 6 months after randomization
At baseline and at 6 months after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evolution of Hba1c from baseline to 2 years post-randomization
Time Frame: At baseline and at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 18 weeks, 24 weeks, 1 year and 2 years post randomization
At baseline and at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 18 weeks, 24 weeks, 1 year and 2 years post randomization
Evolution of C-peptide from baseline to 2 years post-randomization
Time Frame: At baseline and at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 18 weeks, 24 weeks, 1 year and 2 years post randomization
At baseline and at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 18 weeks, 24 weeks, 1 year and 2 years post randomization
Evolution of insulin secretion from baseline to 24 weeks using the HOMA-B calculator
Time Frame: At baseline and at 24 weeks post-randomization
Equal to 20 x fasting insulin (μIU/ml)/ fasting glucose (mmol/ml) - 3.5
At baseline and at 24 weeks post-randomization
Evolution of insulin resistance from baseline to 24 weeks
Time Frame: At baseline and at 24 weeks post-randomization
we will use the HOMA-IR (= fasting insulin (μIU/ml) × fasting glucose (mmol/ml)/ 22.5) and Disse index (=Disse 12*((2.5*(HDL-total cholesterol)-NEFA)-insulin)) which are two complementary markers to evaluate insulin resistance using different parameters
At baseline and at 24 weeks post-randomization
Glycaemia profile (using glycemic holter) changes from baseline to 6 weeks and 24 weeks
Time Frame: At baseline and at 6 weeks and 24 weeks post-randomization
Glycemic holter will be placed on the patient for 3 days at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months and will collect glycemic curve excursions that will further be compared at the different visits (baseline, 6 and 24 weeks). We will analyse the % and duration of hyperglycemia and hypoglycaemia and the % of time and duration at glycemic target at the different visits (baseline, 6 and 24 weeks)
At baseline and at 6 weeks and 24 weeks post-randomization
Number of anti-diabetic (antiT2D) drugs
Time Frame: At baseline and at 1 and 2 years post-randomization
The number of concomitant anti-diabetic drugs will be analysed
At baseline and at 1 and 2 years post-randomization
Type of antiT2D drugs
Time Frame: At baseline and at 1 and 2 years post-randomization
The type of anti-diabetic drugs will be analysed
At baseline and at 1 and 2 years post-randomization
Number of patients reaching Diabetic Remission (DR)
Time Frame: At baseline and at 24 weeks, 1 and 2 years post-randomization
At baseline and at 24 weeks, 1 and 2 years post-randomization
Proportion of patient needing a "safety" glucose lowering treatment to control Hba1c despite FMTs (or placebo)
Time Frame: From baseline to 2 years post-randomization
From baseline to 2 years post-randomization
Evaluate FMT safety
Time Frame: From baseline to 2 years post-randomization
Evaluate safety and AE by a systematic screening regarding fever, bloating, diarrhoea, regurgitation at each visit
From baseline to 2 years post-randomization
Evaluate quality of life
Time Frame: At baseline and at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 18 weeks, 24 weeks, 1 year and 2 years post randomization
Evaluate changes in quality of life after capsulized FMT (baseline vs. after FMT and between treatment groups using SF36 questionnaire)
At baseline and at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 18 weeks, 24 weeks, 1 year and 2 years post randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • APHP180591
  • 2019-003841-13 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The procedures carried out with the French data privacy authority (CNIL, Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés) do not provide for the transmission of the database, nor do the information and consent documents signed by the patients. Consultation by the editorial board or interested researchers of individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the article after deidentification may nevertheless be considered, subject to prior determination of the terms and conditions of such consultation and in respect for compliance with the applicable regulations

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 3 months and ending 3 years following article publication. Requests out of these time frame can also be submitted to the sponsor

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Capsulized fecal microbiota transfer containing the healthy feces + stool dilution solution

3
Subscribe