Atalante Exoskeleton in the Rehabilitation of Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (EXALS)

Safety and Efficacy of the Atalante Exoskeleton in the Rehabilitation of Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Study Protocol for an Open, Uncontrolled Interventional Study, EXALS.

Using a MRI gait motor imagery paradigm in ALS patients in order to study how ALS affects the function of the central neural networks involved in gait function, we showed a reorganization of the motor networks that represents a compensatory response to the dysfunction of the networks involved in gait function. Our main hypothesis is that by providing coherent proprioceptive input to the sensorimotor integration areas, gait training with an exoskeleton may boost compensatory network reorganization and help to maintain function. We hypothesize that this can be achieved through a locomotion training strategy that reproduces normal gait motor patterns and appropriate sensory feedback. Gait training with an exoskeleton can meet these needs. The Atalante exoskeleton offers unique potential thanks to its cutting-edge technological features, hands-free functions and availability in numerous centers across Europe. Evaluation of its safety and efficacy in ALS is of the utmost interest in order to generalize this new approach in ALS.

Study Overview

Status

Suspended

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Current research is mainly focused on evaluating the effect of robotic rehabilitation on locomotion in ALS. In order to understand this approach, it is important to validate its safety and to determine patient's experience with this new rehabilitation concept in ALS. In this study, we aim to evaluate the safety, the participant experience and effectiveness of the training program with the Atalante exoskeleton as a gait training tool for ALS patients, compared with usual care, on walking ability, functional capacity and other symptoms associated with motor disability. The Atalante exoskeleton is the only self-balancing exoskeleton that enables assisted walking without walking aid, reproducing a natural walking pattern and multidirectional movement. EXALS is an interventional, monocentric, prospective, open trial. With a limited number of studies on gait rehabilitation exoskeletons in ALS, this study represents a significant scientific contribution, being the first to explore the benefits of a self-balancing exoskeleton with a rigorous design. In addition to robust outcome measures, this study places importance on participants' perception, motivation, and involvement in decision-making, adding depth and strength to the research.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière
      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Institut de Myologie
      • Paris, France, 75001
        • Station Debout

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (defined according to the El Escorial criteria: possible, probable or definite), at the time of diagnosis
  • Male or female, between 18 and 70 years of age
  • Slowly and moderately evolving patients ∆ ALS Progression rate (FS) ≤ 1.11 (The ALS progression rate was calculated as follows: (48 - ALSFRS-R at screening visit) / (duration from onset to this visit (month)) (Kimura et al., 2006). ALSFRS-R progression will be classified as slow (∆FS ≤ 0.47), intermediate (0.47 ≤ ∆PR ≤1.11) or fast (∆PR > 1.11) (Labra et al., 2016).
  • Manual muscle testing ≥ 3 for deltoid muscle and ≥ 4 for neck flexors and extensors muscles
  • Ambulatory status: a stable gait deficit with a total score between 3 and 6 on the ALSFRS-R sub-items "walking" and "climbing stairs"
  • French speaking patient
  • Patient affiliated with the French social security system
  • Signed informed consent
  • Measurements related to the use of the Atalante exoskeleton:
  • Height between 155 and 190 cm
  • Weight < 90 kg
  • Pelvis width < 46 cm in seated position
  • Thigh length between 56.8 and 64.8 cm
  • Leg length > 45.7cm or less than:
  • 60.7cm if ankle dorsi flexion is ≥16°
  • 57.7cm if ankle dorsi flexion is ≥13°and <16°
  • 56.7cm if ankle dorsi flexion is>10°and ≤13°
  • 55.7cm if ankle dorsi flexion is ≥ 0°and ≤10°
  • Joint amplitudes of lower limbs :
  • Hip: flexion 90°, extension 5°, medial rotation 10°, lateral rotation 20°, abduction 17°, adduction 10°
  • Knee: flexion 5-110°
  • Ankle: dorsiflexion (knee straight) 0°, plantarflexion 9°, eversion18°, inversion 18°.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Osteoporosis at the femoral and/or lumbar level (T score ≤ -2.5), confirmed by bone densitometry at both the femoral and lumbar sites.
  • Pressure ulcers in areas of contact with the exoskeleton
  • Severe spasticity (greater than Ashworth 3) for adductor, hamstring, quadriceps and sural triceps muscles or uncontrolled clonus
  • Cardiac or respiratory contraindications to physical effort
  • Cognitive impairment that can affect comprehension
  • Pregnancy or attempted pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Patient

Single-group study following an ABA design:

Phase A1 (usual care for 6 weeks) Phase B (usual care + gait training using exoskeleton for 6 weeks) Phase A2 (usual care for 6 weeks) All participants undergo the same sequence of conditions according to the protocol.

The gait training program using Atalante exoskeleton consisted of 3 sessions per week for 6 weeks. Each session includes the patient's installation and de-installation (10 min), walking training (30 min), and physical activities at the end of the session where the patient is in an upright position in the exoskeleton (e.g. badminton, boxing, or basketball) (5-10 min). For each participant, the assistance of the exoskeleton can be specifically adjusted and can be set symmetrically or asymmetrically bases on his capabilities.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety of Atalante exoskeleton
Time Frame: During the three consecutive phases of the study (A1, B, and A2), from baseline (Week 0) through Week 18, with assessments at Weeks 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 and during all training sessions in phase B
Monitoring adverse events
During the three consecutive phases of the study (A1, B, and A2), from baseline (Week 0) through Week 18, with assessments at Weeks 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 and during all training sessions in phase B

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intrinsic motivation
Time Frame: week 12
Intrinsic motivation inventory
week 12
Subjective impact of gait training with Atalante exoskeleton on participants
Time Frame: week 12
The participant's experience with domain-oriented exoskeleton training
week 12
Participants' attitudes to Atalante gait training
Time Frame: week 12
Net promoter score
week 12
Functional capacity
Time Frame: During the three consecutive phases of the study (A1, B, and A2), from baseline (Week 0) through Week 18, with assessments at Weeks 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 (7 assessments in total)
ALSFRS-R
During the three consecutive phases of the study (A1, B, and A2), from baseline (Week 0) through Week 18, with assessments at Weeks 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 (7 assessments in total)
Pulmonary function
Time Frame: During the three consecutive phases of the study (A1, B, and A2), from baseline (Week 0) through Week 18, with assessments at Weeks 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 (7 assessments in total)
Forced vital capacity
During the three consecutive phases of the study (A1, B, and A2), from baseline (Week 0) through Week 18, with assessments at Weeks 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 (7 assessments in total)
Gait ability
Time Frame: During the three consecutive phases of the study (A1, B, and A2), from baseline (Week 0) through Week 18, with assessments at Weeks 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 (7 assessments in total)l
The 6-minute walk test, the 10-meter walk test and the Timed Up and Go test
During the three consecutive phases of the study (A1, B, and A2), from baseline (Week 0) through Week 18, with assessments at Weeks 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 (7 assessments in total)l
Static and dynamic balance
Time Frame: During the three consecutive phases of the study (A1, B, and A2), from baseline (Week 0) through Week 18, with assessments at Weeks 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 (7 assessments in total)
Berg Balance Scale (0 - 56) with higher scores representing better balance
During the three consecutive phases of the study (A1, B, and A2), from baseline (Week 0) through Week 18, with assessments at Weeks 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 (7 assessments in total)
Speed of movement of the center of pressure per second
Time Frame: During the three consecutive phases of the study (A1, B, and A2), from baseline (Week 0) through Week 18, with assessments at Weeks 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 (7 assessments in total)
Force platform
During the three consecutive phases of the study (A1, B, and A2), from baseline (Week 0) through Week 18, with assessments at Weeks 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 (7 assessments in total)
Lower limb muscle strength
Time Frame: During the three consecutive phases of the study (A1, B, and A2), from baseline (Week 0) through Week 18, with assessments at Weeks 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 (7 assessments in total)
Isometric dynamometer
During the three consecutive phases of the study (A1, B, and A2), from baseline (Week 0) through Week 18, with assessments at Weeks 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 (7 assessments in total)
Spasticity of knee flexor and extensor muscles
Time Frame: During the three consecutive phases of the study (A1, B, and A2), from baseline (Week 0) through Week 18, with assessments at Weeks 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 (7 assessments in total)
Instrumental assessment with isokinetic dynamometer
During the three consecutive phases of the study (A1, B, and A2), from baseline (Week 0) through Week 18, with assessments at Weeks 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 (7 assessments in total)
Patient quality of life
Time Frame: During the three consecutive phases (A1, B, and A2), with assessments at baseline (Week 0), Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18 (4 assessments in total)
ALSAQ-40
During the three consecutive phases (A1, B, and A2), with assessments at baseline (Week 0), Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18 (4 assessments in total)
General fatigue
Time Frame: During the three consecutive phases (A1, B, and A2), with assessments at baseline (Week 0), Weeks 3, 6, 12, and 18 (5 assessments in total).
Fatigue Severity Scale and the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale
During the three consecutive phases (A1, B, and A2), with assessments at baseline (Week 0), Weeks 3, 6, 12, and 18 (5 assessments in total).
Patient pain
Time Frame: During the three consecutive phases (A1, B, and A2), with assessments at baseline (Week 0), Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18 (4 assessments in total).
Brief pain inventory-short form
During the three consecutive phases (A1, B, and A2), with assessments at baseline (Week 0), Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18 (4 assessments in total).
Anxiety and depression
Time Frame: During the three consecutive phases (A1, B, and A2), with assessments at baseline (Week 0), Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18 (4 assessments in total).
Hospital anxiety and depression scale
During the three consecutive phases (A1, B, and A2), with assessments at baseline (Week 0), Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18 (4 assessments in total).
Efficacy and interactivity of the Atalante exoskeleton
Time Frame: Week 12
A specific questionnaire was developed to assess the efficacy and interactivity of the Atalante exoskeleton
Week 12
Participants' experience of gait training with Atalante exoskeleton
Time Frame: week 12
Semi-structured interview
week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ghida TRAD, PhD, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale (LIB), 75006-Paris (France), Neuromuscular Physiology and Evaluation Lab, Neuromuscular Investigation Center, Institute of Myology, 75013-Paris (France)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 31, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 29, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 29, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 10, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after de-identification, may be made available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author. Data sharing will be subject to institutional and ethical approvals.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Following publication of the study results

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers with a methodologically sound proposal and appropriate ethical approval may request access to the de-identified data and supporting documents from the corresponding author

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ALS - Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Atalante exoskeleton

Subscribe