- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06241430
The CardioClip Study (CardioClip)
Hemodynamic-Guided Optimization With the CardioMEMS Device of Patients With Heart Failure and Secondary Mitral Regurgitation Undergoing Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair With the MitraClip Device
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Patients with heart failure suffer considerably. They experience an increased risk of death and are hospitalized with symptoms of heart failure frequently. Often times, heart failure results in abnormal function of the mitral valve (one of the key valves separating the heart's main pumping chamber - the left ventricle - from the left atrium, which collects oxygenated blood from arteries in the lung). This abnormal function causes the valve to leak - a condition called mitral regurgitation - that perpetuates and can exacerbate heart failure.
Recently, researchers have developed a procedure for patients with mitral regurgitation in the setting of heart failure called mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (mTEER). In this procedure, a "clip" is deployed to grasp the mitral valve leaflet and re-approximate them, thereby reducing the amount of mitral regurgitation. This procedure is performed by accessing one of the large veins in the body and no surgical intervention is required. Patients typically recover within 24 hours and are discharged home without the prolonged recovery periods associated with traditional therapies for mitral regurgitation like open heart surgery and mitral valve repair or replacement. Moreover, the procedure is exceedingly safe, with a very low risk of significant adverse complications.
While mTEER reduces the risk of death and hospitalization for heart failure compared with the standard of care (i.e., medicines geared at improving heart function), many patients still suffer significant adverse events within a five year period. Accordingly, the investigators are interested in identifying strategies to further improve outcomes for patients with heart failure and significant mitral regurgitation. The CardioClip study endeavors to use another technology - a wireless pulmonary artery pressure sensor - that is implanted in a similar fashion to the way mTEER is performed (i.e., percutaneously, without surgery, through one of the veins in the groin), to see whether clinical outcomes can be improved further. The sensor continuously transmits information regarding heart function to clinicians who can optimize medications and their doses according to dynamic changes in pressure noted by the sensor.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Kate Dalton, MS, RD, CCRC
- Phone Number: (347) 514-3366
- Email: keb2114@cumc.columbia.edu
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10032
- Recruiting
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center / NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
-
Principal Investigator:
- Nir Uriel, MD
-
Contact:
- Kate Dalton, MS, RD, CCRC
- Email: keb2114@cumc.columbia.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Michael Brener, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Significant (moderate-severe [3+] or severe [4+] secondary MR)
- Left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction >20% and <50%)
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-IVa symptoms
- Sign informed consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Left ventricular (LV) end-systolic dimension 70 mm
- PA systolic pressure 70 mmHg (fixed)
- Mitral valve (MV) orifice area <4.0 cm2
- Commissural MR jet or leaflet anatomy not suitable for mTEER
- Likely to undergo heart transplantation or LV assist device implantation in the next 12 months
- Recurrent (i.e., >1) pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis
- Complex congenital heart disease
- Mechanical right heart valve (tricuspid or pulmonic)
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy implanted within 3 months of enrollment
- Hypersensitivity to aspirin and/or clopidogrel
- History of medication non-adherence
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: CardioMems
Participants randomized to this arm will receive hemodynamic-guided GDMT titration with CardioMems.
|
Hemodynamic-guided optimization will be performed using the CardioMEMS CardioClip device.
|
|
No Intervention: Usual Care
Participants randomized to this arm will receive usual care involving GDMT.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary (OS) score between baseline (pre-mTEER) and 12 months after mTEER.
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a 23-item self-administered questionnaire developed to independently measure the patient's perception of their health status, which includes heart failure symptoms, impact on physical and social function, and how their heart failure impacts their quality of life (QOL) within a 2-week recall period.
To facilitate interpretation, all scores are represented on a 0-to-100-point scale, where lower scores represent more severe symptoms and/or limitations and scores of 100 indicate no symptoms, no limitations, and excellent quality of life (i.e., higher score indicates a better outcome).
The Overall Summary (OS) score is the mean of four subdomain scores, each ranging from 0 to 100.
A higher OS score indicates better outcome.
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
All-cause mortality rate at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
|
All-cause mortality rate will be calculated at 12 months.
|
12 months
|
|
Rate of HFH at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Heart failure hospitalization (HFH) rate will be calculated.
|
12 months
|
|
6-minute walk test (6MWT) at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The 6 minute walk test (6MWT) assesses distance walked over 6 minutes as a sub-maximal test of aerobic capacity/endurance.
The score of the test is the distance a patient walks in 6 minutes at 12 months.
|
12 months
|
|
Change in 6-minute walk test (6MWT) from baseline to 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
|
The 6 minute walk test (6MWT) assesses distance walked over 6 minutes as a sub-maximal test of aerobic capacity/endurance.
The score of the test is the distance a patient walks in 6 minutes.
Change of score at baseline and then at 12 months will be calculated.
|
Baseline and 12 months
|
|
Echocardiographic estimates of RV-PA coupling indices
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Right ventricular (RV)-pulmonary arterial (PA) (RV-PA) coupling indices will be measured (mm/mmHg) will be measured to determine how the right ventricle and pulmonary circulation interact.
|
12 months
|
|
Device-related (MitraClip) complications at 12 (single-leaflet device detachment, device embolization, endocarditis requiring surgery, mitral stenosis requiring surgery)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
MitraClip complications
|
12 months
|
|
Single-leaflet Device Detachments
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Device-related MitraClip complications: Total number of single-leaflet device detachment events.
|
12 months
|
|
Device Embolizations (MitraClip)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Device-related MitraClip complications: Total number of device embolizations.
|
12 months
|
|
Endocarditis (Requiring Surgery)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Device-related MitraClip complications: Total number of endocarditis events requiring surgery.
|
12 months
|
|
Mitral Stenosis (Requiring Surgery)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Device-related MitraClip complications: Total number of mitral stenosis events requiring surgery.
|
12 months
|
|
Device- or System-related Failures
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Device-related CardioMEMS complications: Total number of device- or system-related failures.
|
12 months
|
|
In Situ Pulmonary Thrombosis
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Device-related CardioMEMS complications: Total number of in situ pulmonary thrombosis.
|
12 months
|
|
Device Embolizations (CardioMEMS)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Device-related CardioMEMS complications: Total number of device embolizations
|
12 months
|
|
Number of participants who achieve excellent clinical outcome
Time Frame: 12 months
|
An excellent clinical outcome is defined by a) survival, b) KCCQ-OS >60 points, and c) no decline ≥10 points in the KCCQ-OS relative to baseline at 12 months
|
12 months
|
|
KCCQ score - Physical Function domain
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-mTEER
|
The KCCQ-OS evaluates health status from four principal domains: physical function, social function, symptoms, and quality of life.
Participants receive a score for 0 to 100 in each domain, with higher scores indicating better health status in that specific domain.
The score for each domain will be an individual secondary endpoint.
|
Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-mTEER
|
|
KCCQ score - Social Function domain
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-mTEER
|
The KCCQ-OS evaluates health status from four principal domains: physical function, social function, symptoms, and quality of life.
Participants receive a score for 0 to 100 in each domain, with higher scores indicating better health status in that specific domain.
The score for each domain will be an individual secondary endpoint.
|
Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-mTEER
|
|
KCCQ score - Symptoms domain
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-mTEER
|
The KCCQ-OS evaluates health status from four principal domains: physical function, social function, symptoms, and quality of life.
Participants receive a score for 0 to 100 in each domain, with higher scores indicating better health status in that specific domain.
The score for each domain will be an individual secondary endpoint.
|
Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-mTEER
|
|
KCCQ score - Quality of Life domain
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-mTEER
|
The KCCQ-OS evaluates health status from four principal domains: physical function, social function, symptoms, and quality of life.
Participants receive a score for 0 to 100 in each domain, with higher scores indicating better health status in that specific domain.
The score for each domain will be an individual secondary endpoint.
|
Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months post-mTEER
|
|
Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification at 1-, 6-, and 12-months post-mTEER relative to baseline.
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months
|
The different classes in the NYHA Classification of Heart Failure are: Class I: No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation or shortness of breath. Class II: Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, shortness of breath or chest pain. Class III: Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, shortness of breath or chest pain. Class IV: Symptoms of heart failure at rest. Any physical activity causes further discomfort. |
Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months
|
|
Win ratio
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
|
Win ratio for the hierarchical endpoint of KCCQ improvement ≥10 points at 12 months, NYHA functional class improvement ≥1 class at 12 months, 6MWT improvement ≥30 meters at 12 months, HFH at 12 months, and all-cause mortality at 12 months.
|
Baseline and 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Nir Uriel, MD, Columbia University
- Principal Investigator: Michael Brener, MD, Columbia University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- AAAU9731
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mitral Regurgitation
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedFunctional Mitral Regurgitation | Degenerrative Mitral RegurgitationRussian Federation
-
Ancora Heart, Inc.CompletedMitral Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Regurgitation | Functional Mitral RegurgitationAustria, Lithuania, Germany
-
Xiao-dong ZhuangNot yet recruitingMitral Regurgitation | Functional Mitral Regurgitation | Degenerative Mitral Valve RegurgitationChina
-
Heinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfCompletedMitral Regurgitation | Functional Mitral Regurgitation | Degenerative Mitral Valve RegurgitationGermany
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedMitral Regurgitation | Mitral Valve RegurgitationUnited States
-
Mitre Medical Corp.BSWRI Cardiac Imaging Core Lab (CICL)Not yet recruitingIschemic Mitral Regurgitation | Functional Mitral RegurgitationUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedMitral Valve Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Incompetence | Mitral Insufficiency | Functional Mitral Regurgitation | Mitral Stenosis With InsufficiencyJapan
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityRecruitingMitral Insufficiency | Mitral Regurgitation (MR)China
-
Hospital Clinic of BarcelonaAbbottUnknownMITRAL REGURGITATIONSpain
-
Edwards LifesciencesActive, not recruitingMitral Regurgitation | Mitral Insufficiency | Functional Mitral Regurgitation | Degenerative Mitral Valve DiseaseUnited States, Canada, Switzerland, Germany
Clinical Trials on CardioMEMS
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure NYHA Class II | Heart Failure NYHA Class III | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure NYHA Class IV | Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure...United States, Canada
-
Montreal Heart InstituteRecruitingChronic Heart FailureCanada
-
STAVROS G DRAKOSAbbottWithdrawnHeart FailureUnited States
-
University of PennsylvaniaCompleted
-
Baylor Research InstituteRecruiting
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedHeart Failure | Cardiac OutputUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedHeart Failure | Congestive Heart Failure | Left-Sided Heart FailureUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompleted
-
Abbott Medical DevicesEnrolling by invitationHeart Failure NYHA Class II | Heart Failure NYHA Class IIIUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedHeart Failure | Congestive Heart Failure | Left-Sided Heart FailureFrance, Denmark, Australia, Belgium, United Kingdom