Safety and Efficacy of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Neurocritical Care

April 15, 2024 updated by: Hao Chen, MD, PhD, Shanghai 6th People's Hospital

Study on the Improvement of Neurological Function and Prognostic Efficacy of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Neurocritical Care Patients: a Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a strategy of perioperative management aimed to accelerate the rehabilitation of patients through various optimized perioperative managements as well as ongoing adherence to a patient-focused, multidisciplinary, and multimodal approach. Alleviating the injury and stress caused by surgery or disease is the core principle of ERAS, which has been shown to reduce complication rates after surgery, promote patient recovery, decrease hospital length of stay and reduce costs. ERAS has been widely applied in many surgical perioperative fields, and it has achieved remarkable effects. However, there are few applications of ERAS in neurosurgery, especially in clinical trials of neurocritical care patients.

Therefore, the investigators attempt to conduct the study of ERAS in neurosurgical intensive patients using a series of optimized perioperative managements that have been verified to be effective by evidence-based medicine, and to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ERAS in neurocritical care. The aim of this study is to explore the most suitable ERAS protocols to accelerate the postoperative rehabilitation process of neurocritical care patients, and to provide more evidence-based medicine for the effectiveness and safety of ERAS in neurosurgery.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China, 200233
        • Shanghai 6th People's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18-75 years old
  • Patients with moderate or severe acute traumatic brain injury or cerebrovascular disease requiring neurosurgical intensive care treatment
  • Hospitalization time ≥ 1 week
  • The guardian is able to understand and actively cooperate in completing the project
  • The guardian signs an informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing non-surgical treatment
  • Patients diagnosed as brain death within the first 24 hours after admission to NICU
  • Patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation, maintenance dialysis, end-stage tumors, and disseminated cancer
  • Patients who withdraw treatment during hospitalization or are discharged automatically
  • Patients who underwent unplanned secondary surgery during the research process
  • Individuals who cannot be followed up during the research process

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Enhanced recovery after surgery
The technologies, processes and measures of enhanced recovery after surgery were applied.

The technologies, processes and measures of enhanced recovery after surgery focus on the following aspects:

  1. Early assessment and treatment
  2. Optimized anesthetic protocol
  3. Reducing surgical stress
  4. Multi-modal comprehensive monitoring
  5. Comprehensive diagnosis and treatment in neurosurgical intensive care
  6. Intensive early rehabilitation treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional therapy
Conventional therapy were applied.
Conventional therapy in neurocritical care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical prognosis
Time Frame: One month, three and six months after injury or attack
Glasgow Outcome Scale score (1 = death; 2 = persistent vegetative state; 3 = severe disability; 4 = moderate disability; 5 = good but not necessarily complete recovery; unfavorable outcome was defined as score of ≤3, and favorable outcome was defined as a score of >3)
One month, three and six months after injury or attack
Neurological function assessment
Time Frame: One month, three and six months after injury or attack
Modified Rankin scale score (0 = no symptoms; 1 = no significant disability; 2 = slight disability; 3 = moderate disability; 4 = moderately severe disability; 5 = severe disability; 6 = dead; favorable outcome was defined as score of 0-2, and unfavorable outcome was defined as score of 3-6)
One month, three and six months after injury or attack

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neuroimaging evaluation
Time Frame: One week, two weeks after surgery; one month, three and six months after injury or attack
Computer tomography or magnetic resonance imaging
One week, two weeks after surgery; one month, three and six months after injury or attack

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Hao Chen, M.D., Ph.D., Shanghai 6th Peoples' Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Traumatic Brain Injury

Clinical Trials on Enhanced recovery after surgery

3
Subscribe