Impar VS Coccygeal Block in the Treatment of Coccidine

March 7, 2024 updated by: Damla Yürük, Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital

Comparison of Coccygeal Block and Impar Block for the Treatment of Coccydynia

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of coccygeal nerve blockade. Impar sympathetic ganglion blockade is a common treatment method used in coccygeal pain. However, experience with the coccygeal nerve is scarce in the literature. The investigator planned to follow up coccidynia patients who underwent impar sympathetic ganglion blockade and coccygeal nerve blockade for 3 months after the procedure. The investigator's aim is to compare the efficacy of coccygeal nerve blockade with impar blockade.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients with coccygeal pain will be evaluated. Patients with organic pathology such as malignancy and infection on imaging and investigations will be excluded. Seventy-four patients diagnosed with traumatic or idiopathic coccidynia will be included in the study. Patients will be randomised by computer programme. Half of them will undergo ultrasound-guided pericoccygeal nerve blockade and the other half will undergo fluoroscopy-guided impar sympathetic ganglion blockade. Pericoccygeal nerve block is performed with the patients lying in the prone position. The sacral horns are visualised using a linear probe. The coccygeal nerves are captured medial to the sacral cornuas and a combination of local anaesthetic and dexamethasone is injected. Impar sympathetic ganglion blockade It is performed in the operating theatre with the patient in the prone position. The sacrum and coccyx are visualised with a lateral view. A needle is inserted through the sacrococcygeal junction and a combination of local anaesthetic and dexamethasone is injected when an optimal image is obtained with contrast material injection. Patients will be evaluated before, 1 and 3 months after the procedure by filling out the Visual analogue scale and PARIS functional coxidynia questionnaire. The investigator who evaluates the patients and collects the data after the procedure will be blinded.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Çankaya
      • Ankara, Çankaya, Turkey, 06010
        • Gevher Rabia Genç Perdecioğlu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Coccygeal pain

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Malignite
  • Infection
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group Pericoccygeal block
Patients undergoing pericoccygeal block
The coccygeal corneas are visualised with a linear probe under ultrasound guidance. The pericoccygeal nerves are located medial to the cornu and a combination of local anaesthetic and dexamethasone is injected.
Active Comparator: Group Impar ganglion block
Patients undergoing impar ganglion block
The sacrum is visualised with fluoroscopy. A needle is inserted through the sacrococcygeal junction. The optimal image is obtained by administering contrast material. A combination of local anaesthetic and dexamethasone is injected.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue scale
Time Frame: Before treatment, week 4 and week 12
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is the pain rating scales. Numbers 0-10 represent the severity of the patients' pain. No pain : 0, Most severe pain : 10
Before treatment, week 4 and week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PARIS coccidini scale
Time Frame: Before treatment, week 4 and week 12
Aims to measure functionality. There are options asking whether there is pain during movements such as sitting, standing, walking. the highest value is 10, the lowest value is 0
Before treatment, week 4 and week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 2, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 18, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 19, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coccyx Injury

Clinical Trials on Pericoccygeal nerve block

3
Subscribe