Increasing Diagnosis Rates While Reducing Examination Time: Can MR Fingerprinting Deliver on Its Promise?

February 1, 2024 updated by: Mauro Costagli, IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris

Aumentare il Potere Diagnostico Riducendo la Durata Dell'Esame: MR Fingerprinting Soddisfa le Aspettative?

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is an excellent method for diagnosis and staging of brain disease. However, lengthy scan times and sensitivity to patient motion limit its efficacy. To address this, a novel method has recently been demonstrated, called MR Fingerprinting (MRF). The investigators' improved implementation of MRF, featuring fully-quantitative data and a reduced sensitivity to patient motion, can be used to acquire an anatomical exam in less than five minutes at a standard resolution. The potential for wide applicability of this technique, combined with an implied reduction in complexity and cost of MRI exams, has generated wide interest. However, published studies have been limited to demonstrations in healthy volunteers, and the effectiveness of MRF in the clinical practice has not yet been proven. Here, the investigators aim to assess the efficacy of MRF in performing diagnostic exams avoiding sedation in children and for increasing diagnosis rates in challenging adult patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Due to its unrivalled diagnostic and prognostic capabilities, as well as the absence of harmful effects from ionizing radiation, MRI is often the radiological method of choice in children. However, radiology units have to face the inability to produce motion-free images especially in young children, even more so in those affected by neurological or neuropsychiatric disorders. These children are often incapable of completely following verbal instructions and cannot remain still in the scanner for a full exam. To avoid uncontrolled motion and the anxiety derived from long examinations, the majority of young children are sedated. However, sedation represents an extra procedure, carrying its own possible adverse effects, procedural complications as well as additional costs. Producing diagnostic, artefact-free images in a short time in children without sedation is thus an unmet need. The investigators' first hypothesis is that MR Fingerprinting can be used in a number of cases to perform a fast and diagnostic exam in children without using sedation.

The advantages of a fast, motion-resistant quantitative scan are not limited to paediatrics but could see wide application.

Disorders of movement such as tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease and severe cognitive impairments such as Alzheimer's disease represent a big challenge when referred to MRI. Although MRI is not a major player in diagnosing such diseases, these patients often require an exam in order to exclude other pathologies with similar clinical manifestations and to diagnose or follow-up other concomitant conditions. Patients with expansive intracranial lesions or requiring frequent follow-up, like those affected by inflammatory disease of the central nervous system, need to undergo long and demanding procedures, and they can eventually get into significant distress. The image quality of standard MRI with these challenging patient groups is often poor, as they cannot lay still or are unable to follow instructions. The investigators' second hypothesis is that MRF can be used to increase diagnosis rates of exams in difficult adult populations, reducing the time spent in the scanner and thus reducing wasted procedures and cost, and increasing patient comfort.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

610

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Pisa, Italy, 56126
        • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana
      • Pisa, Italy, 56128
        • IRCCS Stella Maris

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Pediatric patients referred to the participating imaging centre for a standard MRI procedure.

Adult patients referred to the participating imaging centre for a standard MRI procedure, with neurological signs and symptoms.

Adult healthy controls.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ability of understanding and speaking Italian;
  • patients referred to the participating imaging centres for a standard MRI procedure;
  • adult healthy controls.

For adult patients: inclusion criteria will comprise movement disorders, severe cognitive impairment, expansive intracranial lesions and inflammatory diseases of the central nervous system.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contraindications to the MRI exam

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Pediatric patients
Pediatric patients referred to the participating imaging centre for a standard MRI procedure.
Acquisition of MRI data with technique "Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting"
Adult Patients
Adult patients referred to the participating imaging centre for a standard MRI procedure, with neurological signs and symptoms.
Acquisition of MRI data with technique "Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting"
Healthy Controls
Adult healthy controls
Acquisition of MRI data with technique "Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting"

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MRF diagnostic power
Time Frame: "Day 1" - Single time point (MRI examination)
To evaluate diagnosis rates with MRF in pediatric patients and challenging adult populations
"Day 1" - Single time point (MRI examination)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

February 9, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Epilepsy

Clinical Trials on MRI exam with Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting

3
Subscribe