- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06257134
Impact on Quality of Life of Symptoms Routine E-monitoring Among Dialysis Patients. (F-SWIFT)
Impact on Quality of Life of Symptoms Routine E-monitoring Among Dialysis Patients, With Results Notification to Teams. A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial Nested in a National Registry F-SWIFT (French Symptom Monitoring WIth Feedback Trial)
In France, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) affects almost 170 people per million inhabitants every year, and 92,500 people are treated by dialysis or kidney transplantation (0.14% of the French population).
The treatment of chronic renal failure is extremely costly: 4 billion euros in 2021, i.e. 2% of health insurance expenditure, and an annual cost of 42,000 euros per patient.
The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of dialysis patients is low, with reports of patients at 40%-60% of full health. In France, there has been a significant decrease in physical (-15.4 points) and mental (-6.9 points) component scores compared with the general population. Dialysis patients often present severe or overwhelming symptoms, which contribute to this poor HRQoL. However, in nephrology, studies have focused on survival and laboratory biomarkers, and very few interventions have been aimed at improving what was a priority for patients, i.e. treating their symptoms and improving their HRQoL. Opportunities to intervene and improve symptom management and overall HRQoL may therefore have been missed.
Ignoring patients' symptoms is an important omission. Of 28 randomized trials in primary care and oncology that measured the impact of communicating patient-reported outcomes to clinicians, 65% showed improved care processes and 47% improved health outcomes. The results of two recent randomized trials in oncology suggest that symptom monitoring can improve HRQoL and overall survival.
There is no evidence for dialysis patients, although therapeutic solutions are available in most cases.
Nephrology teams do not sufficiently recognize the prevalence, severity and negative effects of symptoms in their patients, and patients under-report their symptoms. With systematic symptom screening and automatic transmission of symptoms in the form of alerts, dialysis staff will be able to react and implement routine management to alleviate patients' symptoms.
The F-SWIFT study evaluates the hypothesis that regular symptom monitoring and feedback to hemodialysis patients and their dialysis staff improves patient HRQoL at 18 months.
In addition, the trial aims to determine whether electronic capture of patient-reported outcomes within a national dialysis patient registry is feasible and cost-effective, evaluated using consumption data from the Système National des données de Santé (SNDS) medico-administrative database.
F-SWIFT is the French part of an international project (SWIFT) initiated in Australia in 2021: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry #ACTRN12620001061921. This French part is funded by Inserm's AAP MESSIDORE 2022.
F-SWIFT is also the continuation of the pilot study n° 2021-A00776-35 accepted by the CPP EST II on 19/10/2021 and financed by the Agence de la Biomédecine (AOR 2021) in the RIPH3 category.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
F-SWIFT is a large-scale, multi-center, randomized controlled trial (qualitative and quantitative) nested in a national registry.
Indeed, this research project is nested in the REIN (Réseau Epidémiologique et Information en Nephrologie) registry, to which all dialysis units in France have been contributing for over 10 years. All information on the dialysis units and the patients included is taken directly from the register. The field presence of REIN's clinical research officers ensures the quality of the data routinely collected for the registry, and reused in this project.
The F-SWIFT project includes a process analysis to support the transferability of F-SWIFT in the event of proven effectiveness, with a view to large-scale deployment.
Data analysis will be carried out by a biostatistician and Human and Social Sciences engineers from CIC 1433 Epidémiologie Clinique at CHRU Nancy.
In accordance with the third paragraph of article 56 of the French Data Protection Act, the presentation of the results of data processing may under no circumstances allow direct or indirect identification of the persons involved in the research.
Experimental group
- Quarterly measurement for 18 months of patients' symptoms using the IPOS-Renal questionnaire, which will be systematically reported to professionals.
- Measurement every 6 months for 18 months of patients' health-related HRQoL using the EQ-5D-5L (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version), KDQoL-36 (Kidney Disease and Quality of Life™ Short Form) and SONG-Fatigue (Stadardised Outcomes in NephroloGy Fatigue) questionnaires.
Control group
- No systematic symptom monitoring will be organized, and patients will receive usual care.
- Measurement every 6 months for 18 months of health-related HRQoL using the EQ-5D-5L, KDQoL-36 and SONG-Fatigue questionnaires.
Process evaluation phase
Quantitative component
For all dialysis units included in the experimental arm:
The REIN registry will provide data on: legal status, volume of patients managed, treatment options offered. The REIN registry will also provide data on patients in these units: age, sex, comorbidity, length of time on dialysis and dialysis treatment modality.
For patients at inclusion, an ad hoc questionnaire will be added on electronic equipment at home, which includes the availability and use of a laptop, desktop, tablet, cell phone and broadband internet subscription.
Per unit, every 3 months, loyalty criteria (% of patients having completed the IPOS-Renal questionnaire) and dose criteria (cumulative number of completed IPOS-Renal questionnaires) will be collected.
Based on the reimbursement list provided by the health insurance (data extracted from the REIN register linked to the SNDS), changes in prescribing practices will be studied (prescription of drugs and supportive care, in particular dietary, psychological and sports care). The before-and-after trends will be analyzed one year after the end of the study in the unit (remote evaluation), since the data are only consolidated at that time.
Qualitative component:
Three months after the start of the study, from among the units in the experimental group meeting the condition without external assistance from the Clinical Research Nurse (CRN) to collect data, five units will be selected following an extreme case sampling (2 with the highest level, 1 with a standard level and 2 with the lowest level of intervention application) to conduct semi-structured interviews.
At this stage, the research team will focus on organizational and implementation factors to provide information for the scientific committee, which will be responsible for decisions to adapt the F-SWIFT intervention and improve its effectiveness. After three months of fine-tuning the intervention, the research team will carry out a second wave of qualitative process evaluation to (re)test the intervention in five other units.
Semi-structured individual interviews will therefore be conducted with patients and healthcare professionals (nurses and doctors) on the basis of a guide developed to gather perceptual data on how contextual characteristics affect the effective implementation and outcomes of the F-SWIFT intervention.
Participants in the individual semi-structured interview will receive an e-mail from an engineer in the humanities and social sciences, informing them of the date and time of the appointment, as well as the connection link if the interview takes place remotely.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Amandine OSTERMANN
- Phone Number: 03 83 85 28 52
- Email: a.ostermann@chru-nancy.fr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France, 54 500
- Ostermann
-
Contact:
- Amandine OSTERMANN
- Phone Number: 03 83 85 28 52
- Email: a.ostermann@chru-nancy.fr
-
Contact:
- Francis GUILLEMIN, Pr
- Email: francis.guillemin@chru-nancy.fr
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Symptom collection phase
The inclusion criteria for patients are as follows:
- Individuals who have received full information on the organization of the research and who have not objected to their participation and to the use of their data.
- Adults aged 18 and over
- Patients with end-stage renal disease treated by dialysis in participating dialysis units
- Patients able to answer questionnaires
Process evaluation phase
The inclusion criteria for healthcare professionals are as follows:
- Individuals who have received full information on the organization of the research and who have not objected to their participation and to the use of their data.
- Patients with end-stage renal disease treated by dialysis in participating dialysis units.
- Doctors and nurses working in the dialysis unit taking part in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
The non-inclusion criteria for patients are as follows:
- Minors
- Patients under legal protection, guardianship or curatorship
- Patient not communicating or unable to give consent
- Patient not being treated in a dialysis unit participating in the study
- Patients being treated temporarily in a participating dialysis unit (respite care, vacationers, etc.)
- Patient with cognitive disorders
- Patient unable or unwilling to answer questionnaires
The non-inclusion criteria for healthcare professionals are as follows:
- Non-voluntary healthcare professional
- Healthcare professional not working in the participating facility
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Other: Control group
Patients in the control group will complete three HRQoL questionnaires every six months via a digital tablet during their dialysis session.
|
No systematic monitoring of symptoms will be carried out, and patients will receive the usual care.
Data collection will be carried out with the assistance of a clinical research nurse up to 12 months, then under the direction of local healthcare teams at 18 months.
|
Experimental: Experimental group
Every three months, patients in the experimental group will have their symptoms systematically recorded using the IPOS-Renal questionnaire via a digital tablet during their dialysis session.
|
once a month, individual patient scores will be sent to dialysis staff. Any score of 3 (severe symptoms) or 4 (overwhelming) on a scale of 0 to 4, on the IPOS-Renal instrument, will be permanently reported to the referrer to trigger the patient's usual symptom management. Patients will complete 3 further HRQoL questionnaires at baseline, M6, M12 and M18: EQ-5D-5L, KDQoL-36, SONG Fatigue. A clinical research nurse will be present in half of the participating dialysis units to help patients and dialysis teams to include and follow up patients, up to 12 months. Between 12 and 18 months, data will be collected in "real life", under the guidance of local healthcare teams. In the other half of the dialysis units, data will be collected under the direction of the local healthcare teams, who will have to organize themselves to ensure data collection. These units will also be asked to conduct semi-structured interviews as part of the qualitative phase. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Health-related quality of life over 12 months, measured by the physical health score of the validated Kidney Disease and Quality of Life™ Short Form (KDQoL-36) questionnaire.
Time Frame: 12 months
|
KDQoL-36 Short form assesses quality of life over the past 4 weeks.
Physical health score ranges from 0=Worst quality of life to 100=Best quality of life
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Respondents' perceptions of the impact of the system's implementation and changes in practices
Time Frame: 3 months
|
semi-structured interviews analyzed by NVivo
|
3 months
|
12-month survival measured using REIN registry data
Time Frame: 12 months
|
percentage (0 to 100%) of patients alive at 12 months
|
12 months
|
Questionnaire completion rates for different arms and periods.
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Percentage (0 to 100%) of questionnaire completed
|
12 months
|
Severity of symptoms measured using the IPOS Renal (Integrated Palliative Outcome Score Renal) questionnaires
Time Frame: 18 months
|
Describe the severity of symptoms and their relationship to comorbidities in dialysis patients in the intervention group.
|
18 months
|
Severity of symptoms measured using the SONG fatigue (Stadardised Outcomes in NephroloGy Fatigue) questionnaires
Time Frame: 18 months
|
Describe the severity of symptoms and their relationship to comorbidities in dialysis patients in the intervention group. Song Fatigue : Minimum value: not at all maximum value: extremely Maximum value means a worse result |
18 months
|
Severity of symptoms measured using the SONG fatigue (Stadardised Outcomes in NephroloGy Fatigue) questionnaires
Time Frame: 18 months
|
Evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention on the mental health score of the validated KDQoL-36 questionnaire. Song Fatigue : Minimum value: not at all maximum value: extremely Maximum value means a worse result |
18 months
|
12-month survival measured using REIN data
Time Frame: 18 months
|
Evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention at 18 months and the sustainability of practices based on the indicators used in the main objective and secondary objectives 2, 3 and 6.
|
18 months
|
Numbers of care consumption, including hospitalizations, drugs, prescriptions for biological and imaging tests, based on SNDS data.
Time Frame: 18 months
|
Evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention at 18 months and the sustainability of practices based on the indicators used in the main objective and secondary objectives 2, 3 and 6.
|
18 months
|
Incremental cost between intervention and no-intervention groups related to the quality-adjusted life-year differential assessed by the evolution of utility at 12 months measured by the EQD5D-5L questionnaire.
Time Frame: 18 months
|
Evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention at 18 months and the sustainability of practices based on the indicators used in the main objective and secondary objectives 2, 3 and 6.
|
18 months
|
Duration of dialysis measured using REIN registry data.
Time Frame: 18 months
|
Evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention at 18 months and the sustainability of practices based on the indicators used in the main objective and secondary objectives 2, 3 and 6.
|
18 months
|
Frequency of dialysis measured using REIN registry data.
Time Frame: 18 months
|
Evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention at 18 months and the sustainability of practices based on the indicators used in the main objective and secondary objectives 2, 3 and 6.
|
18 months
|
Number of dialysis stops measured using REIN registry data.
Time Frame: 18 months
|
Evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention at 18 months and the sustainability of practices based on the indicators used in the main objective and secondary objectives 2, 3 and 6.
|
18 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Francis GUILLEMIN, MD, PhD, Centre d'Investigation Clinique - Epidémiologie Clinique 1433
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Basch E, Deal AM, Kris MG, Scher HI, Hudis CA, Sabbatini P, Rogak L, Bennett AV, Dueck AC, Atkinson TM, Chou JF, Dulko D, Sit L, Barz A, Novotny P, Fruscione M, Sloan JA, Schrag D. Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 20;34(6):557-65. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.0830. Epub 2015 Dec 7. Erratum In: J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun 20;34(18):2198. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb 20;37(6):528.
- Basch E, Deal AM, Dueck AC, Scher HI, Kris MG, Hudis C, Schrag D. Overall Survival Results of a Trial Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes for Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Treatment. JAMA. 2017 Jul 11;318(2):197-198. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7156.
- Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013 Sep;15(3):398-405. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12048. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
- Davison SN, Levin A, Moss AH, Jha V, Brown EA, Brennan F, Murtagh FE, Naicker S, Germain MJ, O'Donoghue DJ, Morton RL, Obrador GT; Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes. Executive summary of the KDIGO Controversies Conference on Supportive Care in Chronic Kidney Disease: developing a roadmap to improving quality care. Kidney Int. 2015 Sep;88(3):447-59. doi: 10.1038/ki.2015.110. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
- Wyld M, Morton RL, Hayen A, Howard K, Webster AC. A systematic review and meta-analysis of utility-based quality of life in chronic kidney disease treatments. PLoS Med. 2012;9(9):e1001307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001307. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
- Raghavan D, Holley JL. Conservative Care of the Elderly CKD Patient: A Practical Guide. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2016 Jan;23(1):51-6. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2015.08.003.
- Janssen DJ, Spruit MA, Wouters EF, Schols JM. Daily symptom burden in end-stage chronic organ failure: a systematic review. Palliat Med. 2008 Dec;22(8):938-48. doi: 10.1177/0269216308096906. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
- Tong A, Chando S, Crowe S, Manns B, Winkelmayer WC, Hemmelgarn B, Craig JC. Research priority setting in kidney disease: a systematic review. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 May;65(5):674-83. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.11.011. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
- You AS, Kalantar SS, Norris KC, Peralta RA, Narasaki Y, Fischman R, Fischman M, Semerjian A, Nakata T, Azadbadi Z, Nguyen DV, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Rhee CM. Dialysis symptom index burden and symptom clusters in a prospective cohort of dialysis patients. J Nephrol. 2022 Jun;35(5):1427-1436. doi: 10.1007/s40620-022-01313-0. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
- Fletcher BR, Damery S, Aiyegbusi OL, Anderson N, Calvert M, Cockwell P, Ferguson J, Horton M, Paap MCS, Sidey-Gibbons C, Slade A, Turner N, Kyte D. Symptom burden and health-related quality of life in chronic kidney disease: A global systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2022 Apr 6;19(4):e1003954. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003954. eCollection 2022 Apr.
- Kalantar-Zadeh K, Lockwood MB, Rhee CM, Tantisattamo E, Andreoli S, Balducci A, Laffin P, Harris T, Knight R, Kumaraswami L, Liakopoulos V, Lui SF, Kumar S, Ng M, Saadi G, Ulasi I, Tong A, Li PK. Patient-centred approaches for the management of unpleasant symptoms in kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2022 Mar;18(3):185-198. doi: 10.1038/s41581-021-00518-z. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
- Greenham L, Bennett PN, Dansie K, Viecelli AK, Jesudason S, Mister R, Smyth B, Westall P, Herzog S, Brown C, Handke W, Palmer SC, Caskey FJ, Couchoud C, Simes J, McDonald SP, Morton RL. The Symptom Monitoring with Feedback Trial (SWIFT): protocol for a registry-based cluster randomised controlled trial in haemodialysis. Trials. 2022 May 19;23(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06355-0.
- Viecelli AK, Duncanson E, Bennett PN, D'Antoine M, Dansie K, Handke W, Tong A, Palmer S, Jesudason S, McDonald S, Morton RL; Symptom Monitoring With Feedback Trial (SWIFT) Investigators. Perspectives of Patients, Nurses, and Nephrologists About Electronic Symptom Monitoring With Feedback in Hemodialysis Care. Am J Kidney Dis. 2022 Aug;80(2):215-226.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.12.007. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
- Lockwood MB, Lash JP, Pauls H, Chung SY, Samra M, Ryan C, Park C, DeVon H, Bronas UG. Physical Symptom Cluster Subgroups in Chronic Kidney Disease. Nurs Res. 2020 Mar/Apr;69(2):100-108. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000408.
- Abdel-Kader K, Unruh ML, Weisbord SD. Symptom burden, depression, and quality of life in chronic and end-stage kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Jun;4(6):1057-64. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00430109. Epub 2009 May 7.
- Kalantar-Zadeh K, Li PK, Tantisattamo E, Kumaraswami L, Liakopoulos V, Lui SF, Ulasi I, Andreoli S, Balducci A, Dupuis S, Harris T, Hradsky A, Knight R, Kumar S, Ng M, Poidevin A, Saadi G, Tong A; World Kidney Day Steering Committee. Living well with kidney disease by patient and care-partner empowerment: Kidney health for everyone everywhere. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2021 Mar-Apr;32(2):289-297. doi: 10.4103/1319-2442.335439.
- Jais JP, Lobbedez T, Couchoud C. [Survival of patients with End Stage Kidney Disease]. Nephrol Ther. 2023 Aug 28;18(S2):35-39. doi: 10.1016/S1769-7255(22)00565-X. French.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2023PI052
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on End Stage Renal Disease
-
Outset MedicalCompletedAcute Kidney Injury | End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) | End Stage Renal Disease on DialysisUnited States
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoWithdrawnObesity | End-Stage Renal Disease | Renal Disease, End-Stage | Renal Failure, End-StageUnited States
-
Bioconnect Systems, IncCompletedEnd-stage Renal Disease | End-stage Kidney DiseaseUnited States
-
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University...Changhai Hospital; Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital; RenJi Hospital; Ruijin Hospital; Shanghai... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Clinical Research Center for End Stage Renal Disease...Kyungpook National University Hospital; Medical Research Collaborating Center... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingEnd-Stage Renal DiseaseKorea, Republic of
-
Medtronic - MITGCompletedEnd-stage Renal DiseaseGermany
-
China Medical University HospitalUnknown
-
Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese...Ministry of Science and Technology of the People´s Republic of ChinaUnknown
-
University of California, San FranciscoCompletedEnd-stage Renal DiseaseUnited States
-
Mark A. LumleyHenry Ford Health SystemCompleted
Clinical Trials on No systematic monitoring of symptoms
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityUnknownQuality of Life | Cervical Cancer | SurgeryChina
-
Dr Jan NovyCompleted
-
Gadjah Mada UniversityNot yet recruitingMaternal and Child Health
-
Northwestern UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of...Recruiting
-
Carilion ClinicJohns Hopkins University; Virginia Commonwealth University; Medstar Health Research... and other collaboratorsWithdrawnChest Pain | Acute Coronary Syndrome | Telemetry | Health Care Resource Utilization
-
Silesian Centre for Heart DiseasesNational Center for Research and Development, PolandCompleted
-
Seoul National University HospitalRecruitingInterstitial Lung DiseaseKorea, Republic of
-
University of Lausanne HospitalsCompleted
-
University Hospital, LilleBiotronik FranceCompletedHeart Failure | Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyFrance
-
University Hospital, AkershusUniversity Hospital of North Norway; Helse Stavanger HF; Sorlandet Hospital HF; Sykehuset Innlandet HF and other collaboratorsCompletedPsychotic Disorders