The Effect of PRP on Wound Healing in High Risk Patients Undergoing Abdominal Hysterectomy

March 7, 2024 updated by: Ahmed Mohammed Ahmed Mohammed El sayed, Helwan University
To evaluate the effect of PRP on wound healing in high risk patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Hysterectomy is one of the most common lines of surgical treatment of various uterine disorders as it provides definitive relief from the associated burdensome symptoms with an estimated prevalence of 13.1 per 10,000 women. The indications for hysterectomy include uterine leiomyomas (fibroid), dysfunctional uterine bleeding, endometrial adenomyosis, genital prolapse, massive postpartum hemorrhages and uterine cancers. Abdominal hysterectomy is still the most commonly used approach although there have been some preferences for vaginal and laparoscopic approaches.

Abdominal hysterectomy is associated with risk of complications. In high-risk women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy, wound healing can be particularly challenging due to a variety of factors, including poor tissue quality, compromised immune function, and underlying medical conditions.

Wound healing is a complex process that involves a series of events that are critical for the restoration of tissue integrity and function. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for enhancing wound healing in high risk patients. PRP is a concentrated source of platelets and growth factors derived from the patient's own blood. It has been shown to promote tissue regeneration and repair by stimulating cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and collagen synthesis. PRP has been used successfully in a variety of clinical settings, including orthopedics, dentistry, and dermatology.

PRP which contains concentrated growth factors have been reported to accelerate wound healing by30-40% giving a satisfactory outcome in the treatment of chronic skin and soft tissue lesions by supplying large amounts of growth factors and chemokines. When platelets become activated, they secrete Seven fundamental protein growth factors initiating all wound healing process, including platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factor (TGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), Fibroblast growth factor (FGF), connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) & insulin like growth factor 1(ILGF 1), which participate in the acceleration of wound healing process.

A randomized controlled trial conducted by Tehranian et al. (2016) evaluated the use of PRP in high risk women after caesarian section. The study found that patients treated with PRP had significantly faster wound healing and a significant reduction in pain compared to those who received standard care. Similarly, another study by Fanning et al. (2007) investigated the use of PRP in women undergoing gynecologic surgery, there were no apparent adverse effects, and pain was significantly reduced.

In our study, we will investigate the effect of PRP on wound healing in high risk patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • - Female patients aged >18 years.
  • Patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy.
  • Patients with a high risk of wound healing complications, including: obesity, diabetes mellitus, use of corticosteroid medication or smoking.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Patients with hemoglobin (Hb) < 10 g/dL.
  • Patients with platelet levels < 110 × 103/uL.
  • Patients with coagulation disorders (on anticoagulant).
  • Patients with malignancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PRP group
on the morning of surgery, 30 mL of venous blood will be drawn from the patient in anticoagulant-containing PRP tube for preparation of PRP solution. The drawn blood will be centrifuged at 1,200 rpm for 12 minutes to be separated into three layers: an upper layer that contains platelets and white blood cells, an intermediate thin layer (the buffy coat) that is rich in white blood cells, and a bottom layer that contains red blood cells. The upper and intermediate buffy layers will be transferred to an empty sterile tube. The plasma will be centrifuged again at 3,300 rpm for 7 minutes to help with the formation of soft pellets (erythrocytes and platelets) at the bottom of the tube. Pellets are homogenized in the lower third (5 mL) of the plasma to create the PRP. The prepared PRP solution will be transferred within sterile single use syringe (3cm) from the laboratory to the operation room, then applied and spread over the subcutaneous space before skin closure
on the morning of surgery, 30 mL of venous blood will be drawn from the patient in anticoagulant-containing PRP tube for preparation of PRP solution. The drawn blood will be centrifuged at 1,200 rpm for 12 minutes to be separated into three layers: an upper layer that contains platelets and white blood cells, an intermediate thin layer (the buffy coat) that is rich in white blood cells, and a bottom layer that contains red blood cells. The upper and intermediate buffy layers will be transferred to an empty sterile tube. The plasma will be centrifuged again at 3,300 rpm for 7 minutes to help with the formation of soft pellets (erythrocytes and platelets) at the bottom of the tube. Pellets are homogenized in the lower third (5 mL) of the plasma to create the PRP. The prepared PRP solution will be transferred within sterile single use syringe (3cm) from the laboratory to the operation room, then applied and spread over the subcutaneous space before skin closure
No Intervention: Control group
the patients received no topical treatment in the subcutaneous tissue or the skin before closure during surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
changes in wound healing
Time Frame: day 1, day 7, and day 30
REEDA descriptive scale will assess degree of wound healing which formed of 4 points in a categorical score assessing 5 items of healing, redness, edema,ecchymosis, discharge approximation of the wound edges, each item is rated on a scale of 0-3 and total score may range between 0-15. lower scores indicating good healing
day 1, day 7, and day 30

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vancouver scar scale changes
Time Frame: day 1, day 7, and day 30
Vancouver scar scale (VSS) use to detect changes of formation of keloids or hypertrophic scars. It assesses 4 subjective variables: vascularity, height/thickness, pliability, and pigmentation within a possible range of 0-14 for the total score. A lower score indicates better healing.
day 1, day 7, and day 30
Visual Analog Scale changes
Time Frame: day 1, day 7, and day 30
Pain was evaluated by the visual analog scale system (VAS) which assesses changes of pain via a continuous measurement instrument. The score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) between the no pain anchor to the point that the patient marks, providing a range of scores from 0-10. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity
day 1, day 7, and day 30
Hospital readmission
Time Frame: 1 month post-operatively
Need to hospital readmission due to wound complications
1 month post-operatively
Infection
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Presence of infection after surgery
Up to 1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Shimaa Bilal, Professor, Helwan University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 25, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 25, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 7, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PRP in Abdominal hysterectomy

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wound Heal

Clinical Trials on Platelets Rich plasma of the same patient

3
Subscribe