- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06299553
Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Tafasitamab in Combination With Lenalidomide Followed by Tafasitamab Monotherapy in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Non-transplant Eligible Patients in Italy (PRO-MIND)
INCB88888-040 Multicenter Prospective Real-world Observational Cohort Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Tafasitamab in Combination With Lenalidomide Followed by Tafasitamab Monotherapy in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Non-transplant Eligible Patients in Italy (PRO-MIND)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
This is an Italian, multicenter, prospective observational cohort study to collect data on patients with non-transplant eligible R/R DLBCL treated with tafasitamab plus lenalidomide followed by tafasitamab in monotherapy, as second, third and fourth treatment line in a real-world clinical practice setting.
The study is non-interventional; all treatment decisions are made at the discretion of the patient's healthcare provider and are not mandated by the study design or protocol.
Since this is an observational study of real-world treatment practices and outcomes, no study medication will be provided as a part of this study. Tafasitamab and lenalidomide will be provided through usual commercial channels for medicines prescription. Tafasitamab and lenalidomide will not be provided free of charge by the sponsor.
Physicians will make all treatment decisions according to their usual clinical practices and will provide prescriptions for their patients as appropriate. The decision to treat the patient with tafasitamab must have been taken prior to and independently of the patient's inclusion in the study. There are no mandatory protocol procedures or diagnostic tests.
This is a prospective observational study: patients will be eligible to enter the study if the treatment with tafasitmab plus lenalidomide is started and when all the ethical and contract procedures with the site have been completed and after the site initiation visit date.
The study will be performed in approximately 30 Italian sites distributed in the overall Italian territory.
During this study, patients must completed questionnaires of quality of life. Questionnaires should be completed by the patient Electronic Patient Reported Outcome (ePRO)at each applicable occasion. Where possible in accordance with local clinical practice, PROs should be completed before other assessments. The following measures are requested to be recorded:
- EORTC-QLQ-C30 (Version 3).
- EORTC QLQ NHL-HG29
The standardized EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (v. 3.0) was used to assess the HRQoL of cancer patients. The questionnaire contains questions regarding the impact of the disease on different areas of a patient's life (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning), the occurrence of symptoms (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhea), financial difficulties, and an overall assessment of HRQoL (Appendix 4). (Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. 1993). For each question, the respondent must choose 1 answer. For 28 of the questions, the answers are given on a 4-point Likert-type scale (1 - never, 2 - sometimes, 3 - often, 4 - very often) and assess the intensity of the analysed parameters. The last 2 questions evaluate the general health of the patient on a 7-point scale (from 1 - very bad to 7 - excellent). Patients completed the questionnaires by themselves. If a question arose, they could ask the researcher for an explanation.
After collecting the responses, a raw score was calculated for each of the abovementioned 15 questionnaire items. Next, a linear transformation was performed to obtain a score in a range from 0 to 100. The conversion of the results to a 100-point scale was made according to the EORTC guidelines. Of note, a higher score on the functional scales means better functioning and a higher response for general health corresponds to a better HRQoL.
The QLQ-HG-NHL29 consists of 29 items, contributing to five multiitem subscales and three conditional items: symptom burden due to disease and/or treatment (seven items), neuropathy (two items), physical condition/fatigue (five items), emotional impacts (four items) and worries about health and functioning (eight items). The three conditional items, which patients complete only if relevant to them, are about having problems at work/education, worries about work/education and concerns about the ability to have children. (Appendix 5) (Van de Poll-Franse L, Oerlemans S, Bredart A, et al. 2018) Items are rated using a four-point response scale ("not at all," "a little," "quite a bit," and "very much") and the reference time frame for all items is the past week.14 The scoring approach for the QLQ-HG-NHL29 is identical to that of the EORTC QLQ-C30, i.e., calculating the mean of the items of a specific multi-item scale or using the single conditional item score and then converting it into a standardized scale ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score for all the multi-item scales and items represent a higher level of symptomatology or problems.
HRQoL questionnaires will be filled out either at the hospital or during pre-scheduled medical office visits. The questionnaires will be provided to the patient by a member of the study team at the scheduled times to coincide with other scheduled assessments or visits, via standard paper copy administration. However, HRQoL electronic questionnaires administration may be allowed as a back-up procedure, to maximize compliance. Patients will be asked to fill out the questionnaires as completely and accurately as possible with an expected average time of completion around 10 minutes.
A high compliance with HRQoL questionnaires throughout the study period is considered essential for the success of this observational study and local Investigators of participating centers will have to be properly informed and motivated towards the importance of collecting HRQoL data.
Each participating center will be requested to submit a HRQoL Missing Data Form in lieu of a HRQoL questionnaire for any assessment that is not provided at the appropriate follow-up time point. Compliance with HRQoL questionnaires over time will be monitored (not for the purpose of informing clinical care of participants) and, if needed, reminders will be sent to participating centers to solicit HRQoL data. The compliance rate at each time point will be evaluated as the number of valid HRQoL questionnaires returned by eligible patients as a proportion of the total number of eligible patients available.
In order to make the HRQoL component of the study as pragmatic as possible, and not to undermine the data collection process across several centers, HRQoL assessment is requested to take place in conjunction with the collection of effectiveness data foreseen for this protocol.
Therefore, HRQoL questionnaires will be administered at baseline (before first tafasitamab administration) and then every 3 months during the first year, and then every 6 months thereafter, unless the patient has a disease progression and/or permanently discontinue treatment with tafasitamab. The first HRQoL assessment after baseline, would correspond to the end of the period where tafasitamab is administered on a weekly basis (approximately at the end of cycle 3), hence with potential expected HRQoL detriments. Thereafter, (starting from cycle 4) considering the infusions of tafasitamab will take place every 2 weeks, HRQoL improvements (although with not known magnitude) could possibly be expected and captured in this study. HRQoL will be assessed regardless of dose modification or temporary treatment interruption, as long as the patient is considered "on study" according current protocol definition.
In case of temporary treatment interruption:
Continue HRQoL assessment as described in the above schedule of administration.
In case of permanent treatment discontinuation with tafasitamab:
HRQoL assessment should be performed at the time of discontinuation (in any case as close as possible to the time of treatment discontinuation) and then stopped afterwards.
In case of disease progression:
HRQoL assessment should be performed at the time of progression (in any case as close as possible to the time of disease progression) and then stopped afterwards.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Nicola Battaglia
- Phone Number: + 39 3429513636
- Email: NBattaglia@incyte.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Mario Lapecorella
- Email: MLapecorella@incyte.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Milan, Italy, 20122
- Recruiting
- Incyte Biosciences Italy S.r.l
-
Principal Investigator:
- Michele Spina
-
Principal Investigator:
- Caterina Patti
-
Principal Investigator:
- Antonio Pinto
-
Principal Investigator:
- Stefan Hohaus
-
Principal Investigator:
- ALBERTO FABBRI
-
Principal Investigator:
- Annalisa Chiarenza
-
Principal Investigator:
- Manuela Zanni
-
Principal Investigator:
- Enrico Derenzini
-
Principal Investigator:
- Francesco Piazza
-
Principal Investigator:
- Paolo Corradini
-
Principal Investigator:
- Alice Di Rocco
-
Principal Investigator:
- Pier Luigi Zinzani
-
Principal Investigator:
- Andrès Ferreri
-
Principal Investigator:
- Leonardo Flenghi
-
Principal Investigator:
- Domenico Pastore
-
Principal Investigator:
- Giuseppe Tarantini
-
Contact:
- Mario Lapecorella
- Email: MLapecorella@incyte.com
-
Contact:
- Nicola Battaglia
- Phone Number: +39 3429513636
- Email: NBattaglia@incyte.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Eliana Valentina Liardo
-
Principal Investigator:
- Francesca Gaia Rossi Dardanoni
-
Principal Investigator:
- Maurizio Musso
-
Principal Investigator:
- Adalberto Ibatici
-
Principal Investigator:
- Maria Christina Cox
-
Principal Investigator:
- Andrea Bernardelli
-
Principal Investigator:
- Daniela Dessì
-
Principal Investigator:
- Sofya Kovalchuk
-
Principal Investigator:
- Ferdinando Frigeri
-
Principal Investigator:
- Mario Annunziata
-
Principal Investigator:
- Elsa Pennese
-
Principal Investigator:
- Caterina Cecilia Stelitano
-
Principal Investigator:
- Mattia Novo
-
Principal Investigator:
- Guido Gini
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients are aged 18 years or older.
- Patients with DLBCL R/R disease non-transplant eligible.
- Patients who will initiate the treatment with commercially available tafasitamab and lenalidomide after the ICF signature. The decision to prescribe tafasitamab must have been made prior and regardless of the enrollment of the patient in the study.
- Patients are able of giving the signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Concomitant participation in an interventional clinical study
- Any patient in the physician's opinion from whom initial diagnosis or follow-up data is unlikely to be obtained reliably data for the purposes of this observational study.
- Patients who started tafasitamab treatment before signing the ICF.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
Single group/cohort
Patients with DLBCL R/R disease non-transplant eligible
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Progression free survival (PFS)
Time Frame: At the beginning of Cycle 1 (day 1 of this cycle. The duration of each cycle is 28 days), visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months).
|
PFS is defined as the time from the date of treatment initiation until the first documented progression or relapse of disease measured by routine clinical care by the physician.
|
At the beginning of Cycle 1 (day 1 of this cycle. The duration of each cycle is 28 days), visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months).
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Baseline Characteristics
Time Frame: Baseline, At the beginning of Cycle 1 (day 1 of this cycle. The duration of each cycle is 28 days), visit in the 1° year(every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years(every 6 months).
|
Demographics and clinical characteristics of patients receiving tafasitamab
|
Baseline, At the beginning of Cycle 1 (day 1 of this cycle. The duration of each cycle is 28 days), visit in the 1° year(every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years(every 6 months).
|
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months).
|
Percentage of patients who have met the ORR definition up until progression based on the physician's assessment.
|
Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months).
|
Duration of Response (DoR)
Time Frame: Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months).
|
The time interval between the initial time point of tumor response (CR or PR whichever status is recorded first) and the first date that recurrence of progressive disease is documented as physician assessment.
|
Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months).
|
Time to next treatment (TTNT)
Time Frame: At the beginning of Cycle 1 (day 1 of this cycle. The duration of each cycle is 28 days), visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months).
|
The time from first tafasitamab dosing to the institution of next therapy for any reason including disease progression, treatment toxicity and patient preference.
|
At the beginning of Cycle 1 (day 1 of this cycle. The duration of each cycle is 28 days), visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months).
|
Time to response
Time Frame: Visit in the 1° year(every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months).
|
To determine the time to response, defined as the time from first tafasitamab dosing to the first response (each response or CR).
|
Visit in the 1° year(every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months).
|
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Cycle 1 day 1, Visit in the 1° year(every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months).
|
OS defined as the time from the date of treatment initiation until death from any cause
|
Cycle 1 day 1, Visit in the 1° year(every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months).
|
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Time Frame: Baseline, At the beginning of Cycle 1 (day 1 of this cycle. The duration of each cycle is 28 days), Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Percentage of patients who have met the DCR definition during treatment based on the physician's assessment.
|
Baseline, At the beginning of Cycle 1 (day 1 of this cycle. The duration of each cycle is 28 days), Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Event Free Survival (EFS)
Time Frame: Visit in the 1° year(every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months).
|
The time from first tafasitamab dose to an event which may include disease progression, discontinuation of the treatment for any reason, or death.
|
Visit in the 1° year(every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months).
|
Progression-Free-Survival 2 (PFS2)
Time Frame: Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months).
|
The time from first tafasitamab dose to progression on first subsequent therapy as per physician assessment.
|
Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months).
|
Information of which treatment the patients will get after tafasitamab discontinuation
Time Frame: Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Name of the treatment after tafasitamab discontinuation.
|
Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Safety of tafasitamab combined with lenalidomide
Time Frame: At the beginning of Cycle 1 (day 1 of this cycle. The duration of each cycle is 28 days), Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Percentage of patients with serious and non-serious adverse events (AEs/ADRs/SAEs and SADRs) treated with tafasitamab plus lenalidomide.
|
At the beginning of Cycle 1 (day 1 of this cycle. The duration of each cycle is 28 days), Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Safety of tafasitamab in monotherapy
Time Frame: At the beginning of Cycle 1 (day 1 of this cycle. The duration of each cycle is 28 days), Visit in the 1° year(every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Percentage of patients with serious and nonserious adverse events (AEs/ADRs/SAEs and SADRs) treated with tafasitamab alone.
|
At the beginning of Cycle 1 (day 1 of this cycle. The duration of each cycle is 28 days), Visit in the 1° year(every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Describe the treatment adherence of lenalidomide and dose reduction.
Time Frame: At the beginning of Cycle 1 (day 1 of this cycle. The duration of each cycle is 28 days), Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Percentage of patients with Medical Possession Rate (MPR) >=80% and dosing.
|
At the beginning of Cycle 1 (day 1 of this cycle. The duration of each cycle is 28 days), Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
Time Frame: Baseline, Visit in the 1° year(every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months).
|
The HRQoL consisted of 30 questions.
28 of the questions, the answers are given on a 4-point Likert-type scale (1 - never, 2 - sometimes, 3 - often, 4 - very often) and assess the intensity of the analysed parameters.
The last 2 questions evaluate the general health of the patient on a 7-point scale (from 1 - very bad to 7 - excellent).
|
Baseline, Visit in the 1° year(every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months).
|
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
Time Frame: Baseline, Visit in the 1° year(every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months).
|
The QLQ-HG-NHL29 consists of 29 items, contributing to five multiitem subscales and three conditional items: symptom burden due to disease and/or treatment (seven items), neuropathy (two items), physical condition/fatigue (five items), emotional impacts (four items) and worries about health and functioning (eight items).
The three conditional items, which patients complete only if relevant to them, are about having problems at work/education, worries about work/education and concerns about the ability to have children.
Items are rated using a four-point response scale ("not at all," "a little," "quite a bit," and "very much") and the reference time frame for all items is the past week.
|
Baseline, Visit in the 1° year(every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months).
|
Health economics - Hospitalization
Time Frame: Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Duration of hospitalization (total days length of stay, including duration by wards, eg, intensive care unit)
|
Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Health economics - DLBCL treatment
Time Frame: Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Treatments administered during the hospitalization
|
Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Health economics - Concomitant Treatments
Time Frame: Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Concomitant treatments (i.e.
supportive treatments) administered to the patient (dosage, number of administrations, way of administration)
|
Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Health economics - Monitoring activities
Time Frame: Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Monitoring activities performed during the hospitalization (i.e.
laboratory tests, imaging procedures, visits)
|
Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Health economics - monitoring activities performed after patients' discharge
Time Frame: Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Monitoring activities performed after patient's discharge (i.e.
laboratory tests, imaging procedures, visits)
|
Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Health economics - Adverse event treatment
Time Frame: Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Adverse events treatment: per each adverse event, the activities performed to manage it will be assessed in terms of laboratory tests (type and number), imaging procedures (type and number), drugs (dosage, number of administrations, way of administration), visits, medical procedures (type and number)
|
Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Health economics - Unplanned specialist visits
Time Frame: Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Unplanned specialist visits that occurred between FU visits
|
Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Exploratory objectives
Time Frame: Baseline, At the beginning of Cycle 1 (day 1 of this cycle. The duration of each cycle is 28 days), Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
possible factors associated with the effectiveness of tafasitamab (prediction of response)
|
Baseline, At the beginning of Cycle 1 (day 1 of this cycle. The duration of each cycle is 28 days), Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Exploratory objectives
Time Frame: Baseline, At the beginning of Cycle 1 (day 1 of this cycle. The duration of each cycle is 28 days), Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
CD19 expression status before and after the tafasitamab treatment, if done in clinical practice.
|
Baseline, At the beginning of Cycle 1 (day 1 of this cycle. The duration of each cycle is 28 days), Visit in the 1° year (every 3 months) and visit in the 2°, 3°, 4° years (every 6 months)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.
- Zinzani PL, Minotti G. Anti-CD19 monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies: a narrative review with focus on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022 Jan;148(1):177-190. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03833-x. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
- Duell, J., Abrisqueta, P., Andre, M., Augustin, M., Gaidano, G., Barca, E.G., Jurczak, W., Kalakonda, N., Liberati, A.M., Maddocks, K.J., Menne, T., Nagy, Z., Tournilhac, O., Bakuli, A., Amin, A., Gurbanov, K. and Salles, G. (2023), Five-year efficacy and safety of tafasitamab in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL: Final results from the Phase II L-MIND study. Hematological Oncology, 41: 437-439
- Calamia M, McBride A, Abraham I. Economic evaluation of polatuzumab-bendamustine-rituximab vs. tafasitamab-lenalidomide in transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL. J Med Econ. 2021 Nov;24(sup1):14-24. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2021.2007704.
- van de Poll-Franse L, Oerlemans S, Bredart A, Kyriakou C, Sztankay M, Pallua S, Daniels L, Creutzberg CL, Cocks K, Malak S, Caocci G, Molica S, Chie W, Efficace F; EORTC Quality of Life Group. International development of four EORTC disease-specific quality of life questionnaires for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, high- and low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Qual Life Res. 2018 Feb;27(2):333-345. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1718-y. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- INCB88888-040 PRO-MIND
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on DLBCL - Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterSanofi; Columbia University; Medical College of Wisconsin; University of Rochester and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingDiffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) | Relapsed Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) | Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)United States
-
University Health Network, TorontoNot yet recruitingDiffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)Canada
-
Hoffmann-La RocheRecruitingDiffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)United States
-
2seventy bioRecruitingDiffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)United States
-
AmgenMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCCompletedRelapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)United States, Germany, Spain, Australia, Netherlands, France
-
Fondazione Italiana Linfomi ONLUSCompletedDiffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) | Elderly Patients (>65 Years)Italy
-
Arbeitsgemeinschaft medikamentoese TumortherapieHoffmann-La RocheCompletedDiffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) | Follicular NHL Grade 3bHong Kong, Thailand, Sweden, Taiwan, Mexico, Austria, Serbia, China, Czech Republic, Australia, Malaysia, Croatia, Israel, South Africa, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav... and more
-
Fondazione Italiana Linfomi - ETSNot yet recruitingClassical Hodgkin Lymphoma | Primary Mediastinal Large B-cell Lymphoma (PMBCL) | Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)Italy
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterActinium PharmaceuticalsRecruitingDiffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma | B-ALL | DLBCL | DLBCL, Nos Genetic Subtypes | B ALL | Dlbcl-Ci | DLBCL Unclassifiable | DLBCL Activated B-Cell Type | DLBCL Germinal Center B-Cell Type | HGBL | HGBL, NosUnited States
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterRecruitingLymphoma | Lymphoma, B-Cell | DLBCL - Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma | Large B-cell Lymphoma | Large-cell Lymphoma | Mediastinal B-Cell Diffuse Large Cell LymphomaUnited States