Conventional Clipping Versus Punching Closure

April 1, 2024 updated by: Ningbo No. 1 Hospital

Conventional Clipping Versus Punching Closure for Defect Closure After ESD:a Randomized Controlled Trial

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an important minimally invasive treatment method for early digestive tract tumors, with a high cure rate, and it is widely used in clinical practice. And wound closure after ESD is a great challenge, which is closely related to postoperative perforation bleeding. Clip closure is one of the most commonly used closure methods. However, when the wound is large or when the wound is located more difficult to operate, conventional closure may lead to delayed perforation, and postoperative clips may be prone to early spontaneous shedding. The authors have recently reported a method that may be able to close larger and difficult wounds because the grooves can better fix the metal clips. The latest study suggests that this approach may be safe and effective, but the study has a small sample size and has no controls. Therefore, high-quality clinical study evidence related to punch closure is required in the strategy of defect closure after ESD, in order to better evaluate the feasibility and safety of this new endoscopic closure method.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

130

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Zhejiang
      • Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
        • Recruiting
        • Ningbo First Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Patients undergoing gastrointestinal ESD wound closure in the First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University from April 20, 2024 to December 31, 2025; 2. Age 18-75 years old; 3. Patients who voluntarily agreed to participate in this study and signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Persons under the age of 18 2. Unwilling or unable to provide informed consent 3. Treatment or radiotherapy for malignant diseases, severe chronic heart or lung diseases, coronary or cerebrovascular events requiring hospitalization within the last 3 months 4.. Severe abdominal pain, bloating, nausea and other abdominal symptoms 5.. Patients with lifelong anticoagulant therapy or severe bleeding disorders, and patients who have recently taken anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs 6. Pregnant or lactating 7. Patients with aggressive lesions and recurrent or residual tumors

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: punching closure
punching closure for defect closure after ESD
The hole clamping and the grooves hold the metal clips better
Active Comparator: Conventional clipping
Conventional clipping for defect closure after ESD
Metal lip closure is one of the most commonly used closure methods

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Completely closed
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The wound is completely closed without dehiscence
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
delayed hemorrhage
Time Frame: 2 weeks and 4 weeks
Any symptoms of gastrointestinal bleeding (e. g. hematochezia) occurred within 30 days after polypectomy and were classified as mild or severe according on the severity of the bleeding
2 weeks and 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2024B014

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on the Rate of Complete Closure

Clinical Trials on punching closure

3
Subscribe