Transdiagnostic, Indicated Preventive Intervention for Adolescents At High Risk of Emotional Problems W/Add-On Modules (PROCARE-I+)

April 1, 2024 updated by: LuisJoaquin Garcia-Lopez, University of Jaen

Transdiagnostic, Indicated Preventive Intervention for Adolescents At High Risk of Emotional Problems With Add-On Modules (PROCARE-I+)

PROCARE is a preventive intervention that has shown its effectiveness in selective prevention to reduce young people's risk of developing emotional problems. In this study, an uncontrolled pre-post study is carried out where this personalized transdiagnostic preventive intervention in online mode is applied in the indicated population, with the following objectives: 1) provide data about whether there are improvements in the emotional state of adolescents after implementing PROCARE-I+; and 2) evaluate if there is any risk factor that predicts anxiety-depressive symptoms and/or emotional difficulties. The sample was made up of 30 adolescents who showed symptoms of anxiety and/or depression and a high risk of developing an emotional disorder and who benefited from the preventive, transdiagnostic, online and personalized intervention called PROCARE-I+. After the analysis of the data collected at the pre-intervention and post-intervention time, the data revealed that the intervention had an impact on improving the emotional state of the adolescents in terms of anxious-depressive symptomatology, quality of life and emotional regulation. On the other hand, the data revealed the absence of predictive relationships between the presence of a risk factor and suffering from symptoms of anxiety and depression; In contrast, predictive relationships were found between the presence of the family risk factor and suffering from some emotional difficulty.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The general objetive of PROCARE-I+ is to implement and evaluate an indicated 8-session preventive group intervention with add-on modules for adolescents aged 12-18 at high risk of emotional disorders like anxiety and depression. The intervention will be based on the Unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders in adolescents (UP-A), already proven as effective in the US, but adapted with indicated prevention purposes in Spain thanks support of main author of the protocol (Prf. Ehrenreich-May). It will be culturally-adapted and designed to be an acceptable, scalable, and sustainable indicated prevention program.

METHODOLOGY: In order to achieve this objetive, PROCARE-I+ working plan will be divided into 3 steps. Firstly, in order to identify adolescents at high risk of suffering emotional disorders (anxiety and depression), the following self-reports will be administered to adolescents: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to evaluate adolescents at-risk of emotional disorders, and the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale-30 (RCADS-30) will screen for presence/absence of emotional symptomatology. Then, ADIS5-C/P will be administered to rule-out presence of anxiety and/or mood disorders. Valuing voices from stakeholders and end-users, the investigators will focus on the study of the influence of the above described variables. Third, the investigators will test PROCARE-I with add-on modules.

IMPACT: The following study will be taken as a pilot study that will allow us to know the strengths and weaknesses of PROCARE-I with add-on modules in order to make future improvements.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: LuisJoaquín J García-López, Ph.D.
  • Phone Number: 953213412
  • Email: ljgarcia@ujaen.es

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Laura Zafra-Palomino, Ph.D.stud
  • Phone Number: 953213412
  • Email: lzpalomi@ujaen.es

Study Locations

      • Tarragona, Spain, 43003
        • Recruiting
        • Universitat Rovira i Virgili
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Josefa Canals, M.D.
    • Alicante
      • Elche, Alicante, Spain, 03202
        • Recruiting
        • Universidad Miguel Hernández
        • Contact:
          • José Antonio Piqueras, Ph. D.
          • Phone Number: 966658343
          • Email: jpiqueras@umh.es
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • José Antonio Piqueras, Ph. D.
    • Jaen
      • Jaén, Jaen, Spain, 23071
        • Recruiting
        • University of Jaén
        • Contact:
          • Luis Joaquín García-López, Ph. D.
          • Phone Number: 953213412
          • Email: ljgarcia@ujaen.es
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Luis Joaquín García-López, Ph. D.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • José Antonio Muela-Martínez, Ph. D.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lourdes Espinosa-Fernández, Ph. D.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Laura Zafra-Palomino, Ph. D. stud
        • Principal Investigator:
          • David Jiménez-Vázquez, Ph. D. stud

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • written informed consent from adolescent and legal guardian
  • able to attend prevention modules on his/her own
  • language competence
  • Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire ""probable diagnoses"
  • score above cut-off for Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale-30
  • having incipient symptoms on an emotional level in ADIS 5 C/P
  • absence of anxiety and/or mood disorders

Exclusion Criteria:

  • in- or outpatient
  • concomitant psychological/psychiatric treatment
  • acute suicidality
  • general medical contraindications that hamper attendance to prevention modules
  • have been diagnosed with a neurodevelopmental disorder
  • Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire "unlikely" or "possible diagnoses"
  • presence of mood and/or anxiety disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PROCARE-I (UP-A for indicated purposes)
To ensure cost-effectiveness, PROCARE-I intervention will be designed as a brief 8-session child-focused programme by adapting the core modules from UP-A, along with one individual session with adolescent and parents. Sessions will be delivered in reduced groups, using a typical indicated preventive intervention format focused on cost-effectiveness.
The active control condition will be based on PROCARE protocol, which was put into practice in PROCARE-I, in 2021.
Experimental: PROCARE-I+ 8-session (for indicated purposes)
PROCARE-I+ intervention will be designed as a brief 8-session with 4 additonal sessions (add-on modules) child-focused programme by adapting the core modules from UP-A. Sessions will be delivered in reduced groups, using a typical indicated preventive intervention format focused on cost-effectiveness.
The active control condition will be based on PROCARE protocol, which was put into practice in PROCARE-I, in 2021. In addition, PROCARE-I+ adds additional modules, which allow adolescents to be provided with tools to address the risk factors they present.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-reported anxiety and mood symptomatology
Time Frame: Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions
The study's primary outcome was self-reported anxiety and mood symptomatology as assessed by Revised Child Anxiety Depression Scale (RCADS-30). Total scores range from 0 to 90. Higher scores mean a worse outcome
Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions
Factors associated with adolescents' mental health
Time Frame: Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions
The study's primary outcome was self-reported risk and protective factors level of emotional disorders as assessed by Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Total scores range from 0 to 50. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions
Absence of emotional disorders
Time Frame: Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions
The study's primary outcome was absence of any emotional disorders over the long-term measured by the ADIS-5-C/P
Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions
Secondary outcome assessed included self-reported changes in health-related quality of life as assessed by KIDSCREEN-10. Total scores range from 10 to 50. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions
Resilience measure
Time Frame: Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions
This primary measure was intended to measure the resilience of adolescents through 10 items with 5 response options. Scores range from 0 to 40. The higher the score, the greater the resilience.
Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Economic evaluations
Time Frame: Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions
Implementation service costs (training, program materials, provider salaries), costs to school system, and later health costs saved for preventing emotional problems that could narrow cumulative disparities in mental health and disadvantage later in life.
Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions
Psychological flexibility
Time Frame: Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions

Psychological flexibility as assessed by Willingness and Action Measure for Children and Adolescents (WAM-C/A).

Total scores range from 0 to 56. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions
Emotional regulation
Time Frame: Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions
The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). Scores range from 0 to 150. The higher the score, the greater the difficulties in emotional regulation.
Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bullying
Time Frame: Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions
Cyberbullying. peer bullying screening. Scores range from 0 to 40. The higher the score, the greater the role played in bullying (aggressor, victim, observer).
Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions
Expressed Emotion
Time Frame: Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions
Expressed Emotion Evaluation Questionnaire. The scores range from 1 to 7. The higher the score, the greater the difficulties in the family communication style.
Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions
Ecoanxiety
Time Frame: Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions
Climate Anxiety Scale. Scores range from 13 to 52. The higher the score, the greater the climate anxiety.
Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions
Exam anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions
Test anxiety questionnaire adapted for ESO and Baccalaureate. Scores range from 35 to 140. The higher the score, the greater the anxiety before the exams.
Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions
Videogames addiction
Time Frame: Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions
Game Addiction Scale for Adolescents (GASA). Scores range from 0 to 28. The higher the score, the greater the risk of video game addiction.
Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions
Smartphone addiction
Time Frame: Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions
Smartphone Addiction Scale - Short Version (SAS-SV). Scores range from 10 to 70. The higher the score, the greater the risk of smartphone addiction.
Baseline to 7 months after start of interventions

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Luis Joaquín García-López, Ph. D., University of Jaén

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Authors of secondary analyses using shared data will attest that their use was in accordance with the terms (if any) agreed to upon their receipt. They will also reference the source of the data using its unique, persistent identifier to provide appropriate credit to those who generated it and allow searching for the studies it has supported. Authors of secondary analyses will explain completely how theirs differ from previous analyses. In addition, those who generate and then share clinical trial data will deserve substantial credit for their efforts. Those using data collected by others will seek collaboration with those who collected the data. As collaboration will not always be possible, practical, or desired, the efforts of those who generated the data will be recognized.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

From June 2024

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

upon request to authors

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depressive Symptoms

Clinical Trials on Active control condition

3
Subscribe