- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06410755
Home-based Rehabilitation Monitoring System With Wearable Devices and Self-Report Application
Research on Evaluation of Home-based Rehabilitation Monitoring System With Wearable Devices and Self-Report Application
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether monitoring and providing feedback on the performance of a home-based exercise program using an integrated wearable monitoring system improves physical and cognitive function, and activity level in participants with stroke.
The integrated wearable monitoring system consists of an insole-type gait analyzer for objective gait assessment, a wrist-worn activity tracker for monitoring daily physical activity, and a self-report mobile application for delivering feedback and collecting participant-reported information.
This study also aims to assess participant satisfaction with the integrated wearable monitoring system during a 6-week home-based gait rehabilitation program.
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
- What effect does monitoring and providing feedback using an integrated wearable monitoring system have on physical and cognitive function, and activity level during a home-based gait rehabilitation program?
- How satisfied are participants with the use of the integrated wearable monitoring system?
Researchers will compare an intervention group that receives the integrated wearable monitoring system with a control group that performs the same home-based exercise program without wearable monitoring and feedback.
Participants in the intervention group will receive an insole-type gait analyzer, a wrist-worn activity tracker, and access to a mobile application, along with training in a prescribed home-based exercise program. During the 6-week intervention period, participants will wear the insole-type gait analyzer and the activity tracker while performing the home-based exercise program and will use the mobile application to receive feedback and self-report selected daily health-related information. After completion of the 6-week program, the investigators will conduct a satisfaction survey to evaluate participant experience with the integrated wearable monitoring system.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
After obtaining written informed consent, a screening assessment is conducted to determine participant eligibility.
The screening assessment evaluates whether participants, regardless of assistive device use, are able to walk independently for more than 10 meters, based on an assessment of baseline symptoms and clinical signs. Eligible participants who pass the screening assessment are randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group.
Both groups undergo an initial assessment, during which baseline gait-related outcomes are measured. Participants are provided with information regarding their current gait status and general characteristics of normal gait and are instructed in a standardized home-based exercise program.
Participants assigned to the intervention group are provided with an integrated wearable monitoring system consisting of an insole-type gait analyzer, a wrist-worn activity tracker, and access to a mobile application. The researcher provides training on the proper use of the wearable devices and application and instructs participants to wear the devices as frequently and for as long as possible during daily activities and exercise sessions to enable continuous recording of gait patterns and physical activity. Based on the collected wearable data, the researcher provides individualized feedback to participants in the intervention group via telephone on a weekly basis.
Participants in the control group perform the same home-based exercise program but do not receive wearable monitoring devices or feedback related to their exercise performance.
At the completion of the 6-week home-based exercise program, an exit assessment identical to the initial assessment is conducted for both groups. In addition, participants in the intervention group complete a satisfaction survey to evaluate their experience with the integrated wearable monitoring system.
Throughout the intervention period, device-related issues, including malfunctions and usage interruptions, are documented. Usage patterns and satisfaction levels associated with the wearable monitoring system in the intervention group are analyzed, and pre- and post-intervention outcome measures are compared between the intervention and control groups.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Gyeonggi-do
-
Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea, 16995
- Yongin Severance Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults over 19 years of age
- Patients with a score of 2-3 on the Modified Rankin Scale who are ambulatory
- Patients who visited Yongin Severance Hospital who understood and agreed to the study and completed the informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- Those with contraindications to lower extremity weight bearing such as severe lower extremity joint contractures, osteoporosis, or untreated fractures
- Progressive or unstable brain disease
- In addition to above, those who have clinically significant findings that are deemed inappropriate for this study in the medical judgment of the study director or person in charge
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Multi-modal Wearable Devices and Self-report Application group receiving monitoring and feedback
The intervention group uses an integrated wearable monitoring system consisting of an insole-type gait analyzer, a wrist-worn activity tracker, and a self-report mobile application, and participants are instructed to use the wearable devices as frequently and for as long as possible during daily activities, particularly during outdoor walking.
Researchers provide individualized feedback to participants once a week based on data collected from the wearable devices and the mobile application.
After 6 weeks, usability and satisfaction with the integrated wearable monitoring system are evaluated.
|
The researcher provides weekly feedback via telephone to participants in the intervention group based on exercise amount, walking level, and activity data collected through the integrated wearable monitoring system, which includes an insole-type gait analyzer, a wrist-worn activity tracker, and a self-report mobile application.
Data collection stability is regularly monitored, and any abnormalities or device-related issues are addressed promptly and documented through telephone communication or in-person visits when necessary.
|
|
No Intervention: Control group
The control group is trained in the same exercise program as the intervention group, but doesn't use an integrated wearable monitoring system consisting of an insole-type gait analyzer, a wrist-worn activity tracker, and a self-report mobile application.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
6-minute walking test results
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
While wearing the insole gait analyzer, the subject performs a 6-minute gait test, which is the test that most closely approximates everyday walking, and the examiner provides feedback on the gait by comparing the average parameter data extracted from the insole gait analyzer to a normal gait reference. The above evaluation is a test conducted to evaluate walking endurance, and the evaluation method is as follows.
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
body composition analysis
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
This is a test performed to check the subject's limb muscle mass, and the test method is as follows.
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
|
Spatiotemporal parameters of walking
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Spatiotemporal parametric data of gait collected while the subject is performing a home-based activity wearing an insole gait analyzer, recording total steps, steps per minute(steps/min), gait speed(km/h), distance walked(m), stride length(m), and swing phase rate(%).
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
|
Korea-Mini Mental State Examination
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
A test that assesses the degree of overall cognitive impairment, taking into account a person's level of education, and the test assesses time and place perception, attention and calculation, memory, language, and spatial and temporal organization.
The examiner asks questions corresponding to the items on the test sheet below and record a score for the answers.
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
|
Short form of Geriatric Depression Scale (Korean version of Short form of Geriatric Depression Scale)
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
This is a test used to assess the level of depression in older adults and able to assess quickly the level of depression in the elderly and identify risk. The examiner asks the subject questions according to the questionnaire below, checks items according to the answers, and scores them according to the evaluation method. This consists of 15 items and is the most commonly used version due to its brevity and ease of use. It can typically be completed in 5 to 7 minutes. Each item on the GDS is scored 0 or 1, depending on whether the symptom of depression is absent or present according to the patient's response. The total score is calculated by summing up the scores for each item. Generally, a score of 0 to 5 is considered normal, depending on the setting and clinical judgment. Scores of 5 or more suggest depression, with scores of 10 or higher almost always indicative of depression. |
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
|
Korean version of Sarcopenia Screening Questionnaire
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Questionnaire that evaluates the decrease in muscle strength and functional performance along with a decrease in muscle mass and it is highly related to aging and chronic diseases. The evaluation method is conducted by having the examiner ask the subject about the following questionnaire, and the scores for the answers are recorded. It consists of 5 questions, and each question is scored 0-2 points. The higher the score, the higher the risk of sarcopenia. If the score is 4 or higher, sarcopenia may be suspected. |
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
|
Functional Ambulation Category
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Assessment of the subject's walking function.
The examiner observes the subject's gait and records a score based on the criteria in the assessment sheet below.
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
|
Korean version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (K-IPAQ)
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Tests that assess various aspects of an individual's daily physical activity and it can provide information about activity level.
The examiner questions the subject based on the questionnaire below, records related information, calculates the total activity time and intensity, and classifies it as 'low', 'medium', and 'high'.
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
|
Grip Strength Test
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
A test that evaluates the subject's grip strength, and the evaluation method is as follows.
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
|
Clinical Frailty Scale
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Test to assess the health status and frailty of elderly and assesses the health and vulnerability of the elderly after the program ends. The scale ranges from 1 to 9, with each level described through specific criteria that reflect the degree of fitness or frailty, a higher score means poorer health. |
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
|
European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
It consists of items evaluating exercise ability, self-management, daily activities (work, study, housework, family or leisure activities), pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, and examiner evaluates according to the form below. Participants will be asked to answer each question with 3 items, and a higher score means more health problems, minimum score is 5 and maximum score is 15. |
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
|
Mini-Nutritional Assessment
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
An assessment of nutritional status and risk of undernutrition or malnutrition using questionnaire to assess the nutritional status of a subject, and the examiner records a score based on the criteria in the questionnaire below.
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
|
Assessment of activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living (ADL & I-ADL assessment)
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
This assessment uses a questionnaire that assesses the nutritional status of subjects to determine their nutritional status and whether they are undernourished or at risk of being undernourished, and the examiner records a score based on the criteria in the questionnaire below.
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
|
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
This is a test that evaluates three areas to assess a subject's lower extremity physical functioning, and it measures and records scores in three areas: balance, getting up from a chair, and walking speed.
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
|
Timed up and go test (TUG)
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
The above test assesses walking speed along with balance ability during walking, and this is performed as follows.
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
|
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
The above test assesses static and dynamic balance, in which the examiner instructs the subject to perform the 14 movements below and then scores them against a set of criteria.
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
|
Cybex isokinetic strength evaluation
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
A test to measure lower extremity strength and power using the isokinetic exercise equipment CYBEX, and 5 repetitions of 60/60 degrees per second and 15 repetitions of 150/150 degrees per second are performed to measure Peak Torque (Nm), Total Work (J), Average power per repetition (W), and Fatigue Index (%) of the lower extremity muscles.
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
|
Application survey response rate
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed up to 6 weeks
|
Subjects complete the following five questionnaires before bed, based on the application usage method they were trained on by the examiner. Based on the subject's questionnaire records, the subject's weekly response rate is calculated as n out of 5 responses and n out of 7 days. The subject conducts the following five surveys before going to bed based on how to use the application trained by the inspector. Based on the subject's questionnaire record, the subject's weekly response rate is calculated with n responses out of 5 and n responses out of 7 days. The five surveys consist of Mood, Appetite, Sleep Quality and Duration, Activity Level, and Pain. |
This test results will be assessed up to 6 weeks
|
|
K-QEUST-based wearable device satisfaction assessment
Time Frame: This test result will be assessed once at the end of the 6-week intervention.
|
The subjects of the experimental group return the smart band to the inspector, and fill out a 12-item, 5-point smart band based on the Korean version of the assistance instrument satisfaction test (K-QUEST 2.0), and a satisfaction evaluation questionnaire for the application linked thereto.
This questionnaire consists of 12 items to evaluate the satisfaction, and the satisfaction with the assistance instrument and the service used in this regard is expressed in 1-5 points below.
If the rest of the items except for very satisfaction are filled out, instruct the subject to fill out the reason.
The target group does not do the above.
1: Very unsatisfied.
2: Not satisfied 3: Usually 4: Very satisfied.
5: Very satisfied
|
This test result will be assessed once at the end of the 6-week intervention.
|
|
10m Walk Test
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
The 10-Meter Walk Test16 is used to assess gait speed in patients undergoing rehabilitation for neurological and Severance: H10_250409 musculoskeletal disorders. Participants wear an insole-type gait analyzer and walk a 10-meter straight path at a consistent pace while the time taken is measured to evaluate gait ability.
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Na Young Kim, MD, PhD, Severance Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.
- Hagstromer M, Oja P, Sjostrom M. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity. Public Health Nutr. 2006 Sep;9(6):755-62. doi: 10.1079/phn2005898.
- Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan DB, McDowell I, Mitnitski A. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):489-95. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050051.
- Godi M, Franchignoni F, Caligari M, Giordano A, Turcato AM, Nardone A. Comparison of reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the mini-BESTest and Berg Balance Scale in patients with balance disorders. Phys Ther. 2013 Feb;93(2):158-67. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120171. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
- Middleton A, Fritz SL, Lusardi M. Walking speed: the functional vital sign. J Aging Phys Act. 2015 Apr;23(2):314-22. doi: 10.1123/japa.2013-0236. Epub 2014 May 2.
- Salzman B. Gait and balance disorders in older adults. Am Fam Physician. 2010 Jul 1;82(1):61-8.
- Bennett DA, Beckett LA, Murray AM, Shannon KM, Goetz CG, Pilgrim DM, Evans DA. Prevalence of parkinsonian signs and associated mortality in a community population of older people. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jan 11;334(2):71-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199601113340202.
- Lamoth CJ, Stins JF, Pont M, Kerckhoff F, Beek PJ. Effects of attention on the control of locomotion in individuals with chronic low back pain. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2008 Apr 25;5:13. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-5-13.
- Lange AK, Vanwanseele B, Fiatarone Singh MA. Strength training for treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Oct 15;59(10):1488-94. doi: 10.1002/art.24118.
- Muro-de-la-Herran A, Garcia-Zapirain B, Mendez-Zorrilla A. Gait analysis methods: an overview of wearable and non-wearable systems, highlighting clinical applications. Sensors (Basel). 2014 Feb 19;14(2):3362-94. doi: 10.3390/s140203362.
- Ngueleu AM, Blanchette AK, Maltais D, Moffet H, McFadyen BJ, Bouyer L, Batcho CS. Validity of Instrumented Insoles for Step Counting, Posture and Activity Recognition: A Systematic Review. Sensors (Basel). 2019 May 28;19(11):2438. doi: 10.3390/s19112438.
- Kirtley C. Clinical gait analysis: theory and practice: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006
- Guyatt GH, Sullivan MJ, Thompson PJ, Fallen EL, Pugsley SO, Taylor DW, Berman LB. The 6-minute walk: a new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Can Med Assoc J. 1985 Apr 15;132(8):919-23.
- Andreoli A, Garaci F, Cafarelli FP, Guglielmi G. Body composition in clinical practice. Eur J Radiol. 2016 Aug;85(8):1461-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
- Kang Y, NA DL, Hahn S. A validity study on the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) in dementia patients. Journal of the Korean neurological association 1997:300-308
- Bae JN, Cho MJ. Development of the Korean version of the Geriatric Depression Scale and its short form among elderly psychiatric patients. J Psychosom Res. 2004 Sep;57(3):297-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.01.004.
- Kim S, Kim M, Won CW. Validation of the Korean Version of the SARC-F Questionnaire to Assess Sarcopenia: Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Jan;19(1):40-45.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
- Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Rutte K, Meissner D, Pohl M. Predictive validity and responsiveness of the functional ambulation category in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Oct;88(10):1314-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.764.
- Kim Heon-tae, Moon Jun-bae, Ryu Seung-ho, and Kang Min-soo. Validity study of the Korean version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): Verification of construct-related validity. Korean Journal of Physical Education No. 2017;56
- Swanson AB, Matev IB, de Groot G. The strength of the hand. Bull Prosthet Res. 1970 Fall;10(14):145-53. No abstract available.
- Nowels D, McGloin J, Westfall JM, Holcomb S. Validation of the EQ-5D quality of life instrument in patients after myocardial infarction. Qual Life Res. 2005 Feb;14(1):95-105. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-0614-4.
- Vellas B, Villars H, Abellan G, Soto ME, Rolland Y, Guigoz Y, Morley JE, Chumlea W, Salva A, Rubenstein LZ, Garry P. Overview of the MNA--Its history and challenges. J Nutr Health Aging. 2006 Nov-Dec;10(6):456-63; discussion 463-5.
- Won CW, Rho YG, Kim SY, Cho BR, Lee YS. The validity and reliability of Korean Activities of Daily Living (K-ADL) scale. Journal of the Korean Geriatrics Society 2002;6:98-106
- KANG SJ, Choi SH, LEE BH, KWON JC, NA DL, Han SH. The reliability and validity of the Korean Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (K-IADL). Journal of the Korean Neurological Association 2002:8-14
- Gomez JF, Curcio CL, Alvarado B, Zunzunegui MV, Guralnik J. Validity and reliability of the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB): a pilot study on mobility in the Colombian Andes. Colomb Med (Cali). 2013 Sep 30;44(3):165-71. eCollection 2013 Jul.
- Dolny DG, Collins MG, Wilson T, Germann ML, Davis HP. Validity of lower extremity strength and power utilizing a new closed chain dynamometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Jan;33(1):171-5. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200101000-00026.
- Tudor-Locke C, Han H, Aguiar EJ, Barreira TV, Schuna JM Jr, Kang M, Rowe DA. How fast is fast enough? Walking cadence (steps/min) as a practical estimate of intensity in adults: a narrative review. Br J Sports Med. 2018 Jun;52(12):776-788. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097628.
- Murtagh EM, Mair JL, Aguiar E, Tudor-Locke C, Murphy MH. Outdoor Walking Speeds of Apparently Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2021 Jan;51(1):125-141. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01351-3.
- Iosa M, Fusco A, Marchetti F, Morone G, Caltagirone C, Paolucci S, Peppe A. The golden ratio of gait harmony: repetitive proportions of repetitive gait phases. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:918642. doi: 10.1155/2013/918642. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
- She J, Nakamura H, Makino K, Ohyama Y, Hashimoto H. Selection of suitable maximum-heart-rate formulas for use with Karvonen formula to calculate exercise intensity. International journal of automation and computing 2015;12:62-69
- Speed C, Arneil T, Harle R, Wilson A, Karthikesalingam A, McConnell M, Phillips J. Measure by measure: Resting heart rate across the 24-hour cycle. PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Apr 28;2(4):e0000236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000236. eCollection 2023 Apr.
- Lee SH, Jung BK, Park SY. Korean translation and psychometric properties of Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction assistive technology 2.0. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society 2013;14:3284-3292
- Karvonen J, Vuorimaa T. Heart rate and exercise intensity during sports activities. Practical application. Sports Med. 1988 May;5(5):303-11. doi: 10.2165/00007256-198805050-00002.
- Sindhu BS, Shechtman O, Tuckey L. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of a digital version of the visual analog scale. J Hand Ther. 2011 Oct-Dec;24(4):356-63; quiz 364. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
- Wang TL, Wu HY, Wang WY, Chen CW, Chien WC, Chu CM, Wu YS. Assessment of Heart Rate Monitoring During Exercise With Smart Wristbands and a Heart Rhythm Patch: Validation and Comparison Study. JMIR Form Res. 2023 Dec 14;7:e52519. doi: 10.2196/52519.
- Snyder NC, Willoughby CA, Smith BK. Accuracy of Garmin and Polar Smart Watches to Predict VO2max. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 2017;49:761
- Alsiddiky A, Awwad W, Bakarman K, Fouad H, Mahmoud NM. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of vertebral tumor prediction using hierarchical hidden Markov random field model on Internet of Medical Things (IOMT) platform. Measurement 2020;159:107772
- Al-Makhadmeh Z, Tolba A. Utilizing IoT wearable medical device for heart disease prediction using higher order Boltzmann model: A classification approach. Measurement 2019;147:106815
- Pinto S, Almeida F, Caldeira S, Martins JC. The Comfort app prototype: introducing a web-based application for monitoring comfort in palliative care. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2017 Sep 2;23(9):420-431. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2017.23.9.420.
- Larsen K, Akindele B, Head H, Evans R, Mehta P, Hlatky Q, Krause B, Chen S, King D. Developing a User-Centered Digital Clinical Decision Support App for Evidence-Based Medication Recommendations for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Prototype User Testing and Validation Study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Jan 18;9(1):e33470. doi: 10.2196/33470.
- Suso-Ribera C, Castilla D, Zaragoza I, Ribera-Canudas MV, Botella C, Garcia-Palacios A. Validity, Reliability, Feasibility, and Usefulness of Pain Monitor: A Multidimensional Smartphone App for Daily Monitoring of Adults With Heterogenous Chronic Pain. Clin J Pain. 2018 Oct;34(10):900-908. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000618.
- Yoshida Y, Patil SJ, Brownson RC, Boren SA, Kim M, Dobson R, Waki K, Greenwood DA, Torbjornsen A, Ramachandran A, Masi C, Fonseca VA, Simoes EJ. Using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate internal and external validity of mobile phone-based interventions in diabetes self-management education and support. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jun 1;27(6):946-956. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa041.
- Jakob R, Harperink S, Rudolf AM, Fleisch E, Haug S, Mair JL, Salamanca-Sanabria A, Kowatsch T. Factors Influencing Adherence to mHealth Apps for Prevention or Management of Noncommunicable Diseases: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 25;24(5):e35371. doi: 10.2196/35371.
- Collins DAJ, Harvey SB, Lavender I, Glozier N, Christensen H, Deady M. A Pilot Evaluation of a Smartphone Application for Workplace Depression. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 16;17(18):6753. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186753.
- Estrin D, Sim I. Health care delivery. Open mHealth architecture: an engine for health care innovation. Science. 2010 Nov 5;330(6005):759-60. doi: 10.1126/science.1196187. No abstract available.
- Kim AL. Effects of structured arm exercise on arteriovenous fistula stenosis in hemodialysis patient. Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science 2012;14:300-307
- Schrack JA, Zipunnikov V, Goldsmith J, Bai J, Simonsick EM, Crainiceanu C, Ferrucci L. Assessing the "physical cliff": detailed quantification of age-related differences in daily patterns of physical activity. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014 Aug;69(8):973-9. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glt199. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
- Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jan;40(1):181-8. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a51b3.
- Shiroma EJ, Freedson PS, Trost SG, Lee IM. Patterns of accelerometer-assessed sedentary behavior in older women. JAMA. 2013 Dec 18;310(23):2562-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.278896. No abstract available.
- Talbot LA, Morrell CH, Fleg JL, Metter EJ. Changes in leisure time physical activity and risk of all-cause mortality in men and women: the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Prev Med. 2007 Aug-Sep;45(2-3):169-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.05.014. Epub 2007 Jun 2.
- Manini TM, Everhart JE, Patel KV, Schoeller DA, Colbert LH, Visser M, Tylavsky F, Bauer DC, Goodpaster BH, Harris TB. Daily activity energy expenditure and mortality among older adults. JAMA. 2006 Jul 12;296(2):171-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.2.171.
- Talbot LA, Morrell CH, Metter EJ, Fleg JL. Comparison of cardiorespiratory fitness versus leisure time physical activity as predictors of coronary events in men aged < or = 65 years and > 65 years. Am J Cardiol. 2002 May 15;89(10):1187-92. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02302-0.
- Thompson PD, Buchner D, Pina IL, Balady GJ, Williams MA, Marcus BH, Berra K, Blair SN, Costa F, Franklin B, Fletcher GF, Gordon NF, Pate RR, Rodriguez BL, Yancey AK, Wenger NK; American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology Subcommittee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention; American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism Subcommittee on Physical Activity. Exercise and physical activity in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention) and the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity). Circulation. 2003 Jun 24;107(24):3109-16. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000075572.40158.77. No abstract available.
- Fritz S, Lusardi M. White paper: "walking speed: the sixth vital sign". J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2009;32(2):46-9. No abstract available.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 9-2023-0194
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Gait Disorders, Neurologic
-
Rehaklinik Zihlschlacht AGRecruiting
-
NUMEN FoundationUniversidad Europea de MadridNot yet recruiting
-
Superior UniversityActive, not recruitingEfficacy of VR Based Sword Fighting Exercises to Improve Upper Body Movements in Hemiplegic PatientsHemiplegic GaitPakistan
-
University Health Network, TorontoRecruiting
-
University of PittsburghCompleted
-
Beni-Suef UniversityCompleted
-
Medical University of ViennaCompletedGait, Hemiplegic
-
Umm Al-Qura UniversityCompleted
-
University of PittsburghNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Withdrawn
-
Istituto Ortopedico GaleazziCompleted
Clinical Trials on Integrated Wearable devices Monitoring sys-Assisted Home Rehabilitation Program
-
Seoul National University Bundang HospitalMinistry of SMEs and Startups, Korea; Exosystems CO.,LtdTerminatedAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionKorea, Republic of
-
Hasan Kalyoncu UniversityCompletedNeck Pain | Cervical Spine DiseaseTurkey
-
University of MosulUniversity of SfaxCompletedSpinal Cord Injury at T7-T10 Level | War Injuries Due to Bullets and Fragments | Spinal Cord Injury L1- L5 | Spinal Cord Injury No Sensory/Motor in S4-S5Iraq
-
Inrobics Social Robotics, S.L.Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain; Fundación para la...Not yet recruiting
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterRecruitingDuchenne Muscular DystrophyUnited States
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterRecruitingDuchenne Muscular DystrophyUnited States
-
Michael Garron HospitalUniversity of Toronto; Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care; Southlake...CompletedChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease | Multiple ComorbidityCanada