- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06410755
Home-based Gait Rehabilitation Service Using Instrumented Insole
Research on Development of Home-based Gait Rehabilitation Service Using Insole-type Gait Analyzer
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if monitoring and providing feedback on the performance of a home-based exercise program using an insole gait analyzer to treat participants who have gait disorder. The investigators also learn about the satisfaction level of this insole type gait analysis system.
The main questions it aims to to answer are:
- What effect does providing monitoring and feedback using an insole-type gait analyzer have on walking patterns?
- How satisfied are the experimental group participants with the use of the insole gait analyzer?
Researchers will compare the experimental group that receives the insole-type gait analyzer with the control group that does not receive it.
Participants will:
- Receive an insole-type gait analyzer and receive training in a home-based exercise program.
- During the 6-week program, participants will wear an insole-type gait analyzer and perform a home-based exercise program.
- The investigators will conduct a satisfaction survey after 6 weeks.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
A screening test is conducted after obtaining consent. The screening test assesses whether participants, regardless of their use of assistive devices, can walk independently for more than 10 meters, following an inquiry into their baseline symptoms and signs. Subjects who pass the screening test are randomized into an experimental and a control group, both of which undergo an initial assessment, are provided with information about their current gait status and normal gait and are instructed in a home-based exercise program.
The researcher provides the insole gait analyzers to the experimental group, trains them on how to use them, and instructs them to wear them as much and for as long as possible so that their usage time and gait patterns are recorded. The researcher provides feedback over the phone once a week based on the collected measurement data. The control group was not provided with an insole-type gait analyzer or feedback on their exercise.
At the end of the home-based exercise program after 6 weeks, an exit assessment is conducted, identical to the initial assessment, and the experimental group is asked to rate their satisfaction with the insole gait analyzer.
Measures are taken and recorded when a device malfunction occurs, the use and satisfaction level of the insole-type gait analyzer in the experimental group are analyzed, and evaluation indicators before and after the program for the experimental and control groups are compared.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Na Young Kim, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: +82 010 9127 4482
- Email: kny8452@yuhs.ac
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Seung Ick Choi
- Phone Number: +82 010 8821 5297
- Email: rehab1@yuhs.ac
Study Locations
-
-
Gyeonggi-do
-
Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of, 16995
- Recruiting
- Yongin Severance Hospital
-
Contact:
- Seung Ick Choi
- Phone Number: +82 010 8821 5297
- Email: rehab1@yuhs.ac
-
Contact:
- Na Young Kim
- Phone Number: +82 010 9127 4482
- Email: kny8452@yuhs.ac
-
Principal Investigator:
- Na Young Kim, MD, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults over 19 years of age
- Patients with a score of 2-3 on the Modified Rankin Scale who are ambulatory
- Patients who visited Yongin Severance Hospital who understood and agreed to the study and completed the informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- Those with contraindications to lower extremity weight bearing such as severe lower extremity joint contractures, osteoporosis, or untreated fractures
- Progressive or unstable brain disease
- In addition to above, those who have clinically significant findings that are deemed inappropriate for this study in the medical judgment of the study director or person in charge
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Insole wearing group receiving monitoring and feedback
The experimental group wears the insole gait analyzer and is asked to wear the insole gait analyzer as much and as long as possible during outdoor activities.
Researchers provide feedback to subjects once a week based on the collected measurement data.
After 6 weeks, usability and satisfaction evaluation of the insole type gait analysis system will be conducted.
|
The researcher provides feedback over the phone once a week in accordance with the subjects' amount of exercise and walking level collected only to the experimental group using the insole-type gait analysis system.
Check the stability of data collection, and if an abnormality occurs, take action and record it by phone or in person
|
No Intervention: Control group
The control group is trained in the same exercise program as the experimental group, but not receives the insole gait analyzers and not receives any exercise feedback.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
6-minute walking test results
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
While wearing the insole gait analyzer, the subject performs a 6-minute gait test, which is the test that most closely approximates everyday walking, and the examiner provides feedback on the gait by comparing the average parameter data extracted from the insole gait analyzer to a normal gait reference. The above evaluation is a test conducted to evaluate walking endurance, and the evaluation method is as follows.
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
body composition analysis
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
This is a test performed to check the subject's limb muscle mass, and the test method is as follows.
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Spatiotemporal parameters of walking
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Spatiotemporal parametric data of gait collected while the subject is performing a home-based activity wearing an insole gait analyzer, recording total steps, steps per minute(steps/min), gait speed(km/h), distance walked(m), stride length(m), and swing phase rate(%).
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Korea-Mini Mental State Examination
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
A test that assesses the degree of overall cognitive impairment, taking into account a person's level of education, and the test assesses time and place perception, attention and calculation, memory, language, and spatial and temporal organization.
The examiner asks questions corresponding to the items on the test sheet below and record a score for the answers.
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Short form of Geriatric Depression Scale (Korean version of Short form of Geriatric Depression Scale)
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
This is a test used to assess the level of depression in older adults and able to assess quickly the level of depression in the elderly and identify risk. The examiner asks the subject questions according to the questionnaire below, checks items according to the answers, and scores them according to the evaluation method. This consists of 15 items and is the most commonly used version due to its brevity and ease of use. It can typically be completed in 5 to 7 minutes. Each item on the GDS is scored 0 or 1, depending on whether the symptom of depression is absent or present according to the patient's response. The total score is calculated by summing up the scores for each item. Generally, a score of 0 to 5 is considered normal, depending on the setting and clinical judgment. Scores of 5 or more suggest depression, with scores of 10 or higher almost always indicative of depression. |
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Korean version of Sarcopenia Screening Questionnaire
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Questionnaire that evaluates the decrease in muscle strength and functional performance along with a decrease in muscle mass and it is highly related to aging and chronic diseases. The evaluation method is conducted by having the examiner ask the subject about the following questionnaire, and the scores for the answers are recorded. It consists of 5 questions, and each question is scored 0-2 points. The higher the score, the higher the risk of sarcopenia. If the score is 4 or higher, sarcopenia may be suspected. |
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Functional Ambulation Category
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Assessment of the subject's walking function.
The examiner observes the subject's gait and records a score based on the criteria in the assessment sheet below.
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Korean version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (K-IPAQ)
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Tests that assess various aspects of an individual's daily physical activity and it can provide information about activity level.
The examiner questions the subject based on the questionnaire below, records related information, calculates the total activity time and intensity, and classifies it as 'low', 'medium', and 'high'.
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Grip Strength Test
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
A test that evaluates the subject's grip strength, and the evaluation method is as follows.
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Clinical Frailty Scale
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Test to assess the health status and frailty of elderly and assesses the health and vulnerability of the elderly after the program ends. The scale ranges from 1 to 9, with each level described through specific criteria that reflect the degree of fitness or frailty, a higher score means poorer health. |
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
It consists of items evaluating exercise ability, self-management, daily activities (work, study, housework, family or leisure activities), pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, and examiner evaluates according to the form below. Participants will be asked to answer each question with 3 items, and a higher score means more health problems, minimum score is 5 and maximum score is 15. |
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Mini-Nutritional Assessment
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
An assessment of nutritional status and risk of undernutrition or malnutrition using questionnaire to assess the nutritional status of a subject, and the examiner records a score based on the criteria in the questionnaire below.
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Assessment of activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living (ADL & I-ADL assessment)
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
This assessment uses a questionnaire that assesses the nutritional status of subjects to determine their nutritional status and whether they are undernourished or at risk of being undernourished, and the examiner records a score based on the criteria in the questionnaire below.
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
This is a test that evaluates three areas to assess a subject's lower extremity physical functioning, and it measures and records scores in three areas: balance, getting up from a chair, and walking speed.
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Timed up and go test (TUG)
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
The above test assesses walking speed along with balance ability during walking, and this is performed as follows.
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
The above test assesses static and dynamic balance, in which the examiner instructs the subject to perform the 14 movements below and then scores them against a set of criteria.
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Cybex isokinetic strength evaluation
Time Frame: This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
A test to measure lower extremity strength and power using the isokinetic exercise equipment CYBEX, and 5 repetitions of 60/60 degrees per second and 15 repetitions of 150/150 degrees per second are performed to measure Peak Torque (Nm), Total Work (J), Average power per repetition (W), and Fatigue Index (%) of the lower extremity muscles.
|
This test results will be assessed two times: baseline, exit (after 6 weeks)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Na Young Kim, MD, PhD, Severance Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.
- Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan DB, McDowell I, Mitnitski A. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):489-95. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050051.
- Godi M, Franchignoni F, Caligari M, Giordano A, Turcato AM, Nardone A. Comparison of reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the mini-BESTest and Berg Balance Scale in patients with balance disorders. Phys Ther. 2013 Feb;93(2):158-67. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120171. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
- Middleton A, Fritz SL, Lusardi M. Walking speed: the functional vital sign. J Aging Phys Act. 2015 Apr;23(2):314-22. doi: 10.1123/japa.2013-0236. Epub 2014 May 2.
- Salzman B. Gait and balance disorders in older adults. Am Fam Physician. 2010 Jul 1;82(1):61-8.
- Bennett DA, Beckett LA, Murray AM, Shannon KM, Goetz CG, Pilgrim DM, Evans DA. Prevalence of parkinsonian signs and associated mortality in a community population of older people. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jan 11;334(2):71-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199601113340202.
- Lamoth CJ, Stins JF, Pont M, Kerckhoff F, Beek PJ. Effects of attention on the control of locomotion in individuals with chronic low back pain. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2008 Apr 25;5:13. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-5-13.
- Lange AK, Vanwanseele B, Fiatarone Singh MA. Strength training for treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Oct 15;59(10):1488-94. doi: 10.1002/art.24118.
- Fritz S, Lusardi M. White paper: "walking speed: the sixth vital sign". J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2009;32(2):46-9. No abstract available. Erratum In: J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2009;32(3):110.
- Muro-de-la-Herran A, Garcia-Zapirain B, Mendez-Zorrilla A. Gait analysis methods: an overview of wearable and non-wearable systems, highlighting clinical applications. Sensors (Basel). 2014 Feb 19;14(2):3362-94. doi: 10.3390/s140203362.
- Ngueleu AM, Blanchette AK, Maltais D, Moffet H, McFadyen BJ, Bouyer L, Batcho CS. Validity of Instrumented Insoles for Step Counting, Posture and Activity Recognition: A Systematic Review. Sensors (Basel). 2019 May 28;19(11):2438. doi: 10.3390/s19112438.
- Kirtley C. Clinical gait analysis: theory and practice: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006
- Guyatt GH, Sullivan MJ, Thompson PJ, Fallen EL, Pugsley SO, Taylor DW, Berman LB. The 6-minute walk: a new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Can Med Assoc J. 1985 Apr 15;132(8):919-23.
- Andreoli A, Garaci F, Cafarelli FP, Guglielmi G. Body composition in clinical practice. Eur J Radiol. 2016 Aug;85(8):1461-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
- Kang Y, NA DL, Hahn S. A validity study on the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) in dementia patients. Journal of the Korean neurological association 1997:300-308
- Bae JN, Cho MJ. Development of the Korean version of the Geriatric Depression Scale and its short form among elderly psychiatric patients. J Psychosom Res. 2004 Sep;57(3):297-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.01.004.
- Kim S, Kim M, Won CW. Validation of the Korean Version of the SARC-F Questionnaire to Assess Sarcopenia: Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Jan;19(1):40-45.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
- Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Rutte K, Meissner D, Pohl M. Predictive validity and responsiveness of the functional ambulation category in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Oct;88(10):1314-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.764.
- Kim Heon-tae, Moon Jun-bae, Ryu Seung-ho, and Kang Min-soo. Validity study of the Korean version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): Verification of construct-related validity. Korean Journal of Physical Education No. 2017;56
- Swanson AB, Matev IB, de Groot G. The strength of the hand. Bull Prosthet Res. 1970 Fall;10(14):145-53. No abstract available.
- Nowels D, McGloin J, Westfall JM, Holcomb S. Validation of the EQ-5D quality of life instrument in patients after myocardial infarction. Qual Life Res. 2005 Feb;14(1):95-105. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-0614-4.
- Vellas B, Villars H, Abellan G, Soto ME, Rolland Y, Guigoz Y, Morley JE, Chumlea W, Salva A, Rubenstein LZ, Garry P. Overview of the MNA--Its history and challenges. J Nutr Health Aging. 2006 Nov-Dec;10(6):456-63; discussion 463-5.
- Won CW, Rho YG, Kim SY, Cho BR, Lee YS. The validity and reliability of Korean Activities of Daily Living (K-ADL) scale. Journal of the Korean Geriatrics Society 2002;6:98-106
- KANG SJ, Choi SH, LEE BH, KWON JC, NA DL, Han SH. The reliability and validity of the Korean Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (K-IADL). Journal of the Korean Neurological Association 2002:8-14
- Gomez JF, Curcio CL, Alvarado B, Zunzunegui MV, Guralnik J. Validity and reliability of the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB): a pilot study on mobility in the Colombian Andes. Colomb Med (Cali). 2013 Sep 30;44(3):165-71. eCollection 2013 Jul.
- Dolny DG, Collins MG, Wilson T, Germann ML, Davis HP. Validity of lower extremity strength and power utilizing a new closed chain dynamometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Jan;33(1):171-5. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200101000-00026.
- Tudor-Locke C, Han H, Aguiar EJ, Barreira TV, Schuna JM Jr, Kang M, Rowe DA. How fast is fast enough? Walking cadence (steps/min) as a practical estimate of intensity in adults: a narrative review. Br J Sports Med. 2018 Jun;52(12):776-788. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097628.
- Murtagh EM, Mair JL, Aguiar E, Tudor-Locke C, Murphy MH. Outdoor Walking Speeds of Apparently Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2021 Jan;51(1):125-141. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01351-3.
- Iosa M, Fusco A, Marchetti F, Morone G, Caltagirone C, Paolucci S, Peppe A. The golden ratio of gait harmony: repetitive proportions of repetitive gait phases. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:918642. doi: 10.1155/2013/918642. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
- She J, Nakamura H, Makino K, Ohyama Y, Hashimoto H. Selection of suitable maximum-heart-rate formulas for use with Karvonen formula to calculate exercise intensity. International journal of automation and computing 2015;12:62-69
- Speed C, Arneil T, Harle R, Wilson A, Karthikesalingam A, McConnell M, Phillips J. Measure by measure: Resting heart rate across the 24-hour cycle. PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Apr 28;2(4):e0000236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000236. eCollection 2023 Apr.
- Lee SH, Jung BK, Park SY. Korean translation and psychometric properties of Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction assistive technology 2.0. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society 2013;14:3284-3292
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 9-2023-0194
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Gait Disorders, Neurologic
-
University of ZurichRecruitingGait, Stumbling | Gait, PerturbationSwitzerland
-
University of ChicagoRecruiting
-
NUMEN FoundationUniversidad Europea de MadridNot yet recruiting
-
Rehaklinik Zihlschlacht AGRecruiting
-
Kirsehir Ahi Evran UniversitesiNot yet recruiting
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedHealthy | Gait, UnsteadyKorea, Republic of
-
Swiss Federal Institute of TechnologyBalgrist University HospitalCompletedGait Disorder, SensorimotorSwitzerland
-
University of PittsburghCompleted
-
Beni-Suef UniversityCompleted
-
Medical University of ViennaCompletedGait, Hemiplegic
Clinical Trials on Monitoring system using a insole-type gait analyzer
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisINSERM UMR-942, Paris, France; LMS Ecole polytechnique and M3DISIM, InriaRecruitingPostoperative Cognitive DysfunctionFrance
-
Centre Jean PerrinCompleted
-
Washington University School of MedicineTerminatedParkinson DiseaseUnited States
-
University Hospital, AntwerpCompleted
-
AllerganCompleted
-
Klinik Hirslanden, ZurichUnknownTranscutaneous Continuous Hemoglobin Measurement
-
Capital Medical UniversityMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCNot yet recruitingSchizophrenia | Metabolic Syndrome | Bipolar Disorder
-
China-Japan Friendship HospitalRecruitingTracheal Tube-related Tongue InjuryChina
-
National Cheng-Kung University HospitalUnknown
-
Region SkaneCompleted