Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine vs Epinephrine

May 13, 2024 updated by: Daniel Katz, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Comparison of Intrathecal Epinephrine Versus Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvants in Cesarean Section

Several studies have shown that adding dexmedetomidine or epinephrine to single-dose spinal analgesia preparations improves the length and/or speed of onset of the sensory block and post-operative pain management without increased negative side effects. To date, however, no study has compared adjunctive intrathecal dexmedetomidine to adjunctive intrathecal epinephrine in single-dose spinal analgesia. The purpose of this study is to determine if adjunctive intrathecal dexmedetomidine is non-inferior to adjunctive intrathecal epinephrine in providing better single-dose spinal analgesia during cesarean section.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Mount Sinai Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Daniel Katz
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant patients aged 18-55 years who are presenting for scheduled cesarean section and are candidates for single shot spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal of spinal anesthetic
  • If patient is not a candidate for spinal anesthesia due to history of coagulopathy, elevated intracranial pressure, infection at site of injection, etc.
  • Emergency cesarean section
  • Preexisting motor or sensory deficit
  • Suspected pre-eclampsia
  • Patient receiving combined spinal-epidural as anesthetic technique

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Dexmedetomidine
receiving the addition of 5 mcg of dexmedetomidine to the standard spinal medication mixture.
5 mcg of dexmedetomidine
Standardized spinal mixture of 10.25 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine, 12.5 mcg fentanyl, and 0.125 mg morphine.
Active Comparator: Epinephrine
receiving the addition of 200 mcg of epinephrine to the standard spinal medication mixture
Standardized spinal mixture of 10.25 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine, 12.5 mcg fentanyl, and 0.125 mg morphine.
200 mcg of epinephrine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time required for sensory recovery at T10
Time Frame: 360 minutes
Time required for sensory recovery at T10 to investigate the efficacy of adjuvant agents in cesarean section. Once the sensory block has receded to a T10 level, the spinal is no longer as effective for surgical level anesthesia. This will be measured in minutes.
360 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to motor and sensory recovery
Time Frame: 480 minutes
Time to motor recovery determines how long the patient will be in the post anesthesia care unit.
480 minutes
Time to sensory recovery
Time Frame: 480 minutes
The speed of sensory regression determines how long the spinal will be effective.
480 minutes
Time to administration of postoperative analgesic
Time Frame: 24 hours
The time to first postoperative analgesic gives information on how adequately pain is controlled postoperatively.
24 hours
Number of participants receiving intravenous opioid
Time Frame: 360 minutes
The use of intravenous opioid agents such as fentanyl or morphine during the cesarean section can demonstrate that the spinal is not adequate for surgical anesthesia and analgesia. Any use of intravenous opioid administered during cesarean section is indicative of inadequate analgesia and the number of participants receiving this will be reported
360 minutes
Time required to achieve T4 anesthetic level
Time Frame: 60 minutes
The onset time of the block can determine its feasibility in urgent situations where there is a time limit in which the surgeon must begin the operation.
60 minutes
Incidence of specific side effects
Time Frame: 360 minutes
Incidence of intraoperative hypotension, nausea, vomiting, shivering, and pruritis. Unfavorable side effects should be assessed as they affect patient experience. These are potential side effects from the spinal anesthesia itself and the normal mixture of bupivacaine, morphine, and fentanyl.
360 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Katz, MD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There is no plan in place to share IPD.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cesarean Section

Clinical Trials on Dexmedetomidine

3
Subscribe