Interprofessional Mindfulness Practices Advancing Cancer Teamwork (IMPACT)

May 15, 2024 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison

Interprofessional Mindfulness Practices Advancing Cancer Teamwork (IMPACT Study)

The purpose of the research is to understand if mindfulness team training can improve the well-being and teamwork in caring for oncology patients. This study will enroll healthcare professionals in oncology teams, including clinic nurses, nurse managers, medical assistants, social workers, technicians, patient navigators, advanced practice providers, and physicians at UW Madison. Participants will be on study for up to approximately 6 months.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Aim 1: Determine the effect of resilience training on team resilience and well-being. The investigators test the hypothesis that resilience training provided to interprofessional oncology care teams will improve team resilience and individual well-being.

Aim 2: Determine the feasibility and acceptability of a resilience training on team resilience. The investigators test the hypothesis that resilience training is feasible and acceptable in interprofessional oncology care teams.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53792
        • UW Carbone Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A care provider in an oncology clinic team (clinic nurse, nurse manager, medical assistant, technician, social worker, patient navigator, advanced practice provider, physician)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Does not participate in patient care or support services

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mindfulness-Based Team Resilience Training
Synchronous, 4-month intervention that teaches skills in mindfulness, stress management, and resilience as an individual and as a team. Sessions occur monthly and include a 1 hour in-person introductory session followed by 3 50-minute virtual sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Teamwork Measure
Time Frame: baseline (pre-intervention), post-intervention (3 months), follow up (6 months)
4-item Edmondson's psychology safety scale is scored on a likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree), where higher scores indicate higher psychology safety
baseline (pre-intervention), post-intervention (3 months), follow up (6 months)
Number of Participants Who Attend Each Session
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Session 1 baseline, session 2 at 1 month, session 3 at 2 months, session 4 at 3 months
up to 3 months
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Time Frame: up to 3 months
AIM is a 4-item survey scored on a 5 point likert scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree), where higher scores indicate greater acceptability.
up to 3 months
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
Time Frame: up to 3 months
IAM is a 4-item survey scored on a 5 point likert scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree), where higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.
up to 3 months
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
Time Frame: up to 3 months
FIM is a 4-item survey scored on a 5 point likert scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree), where higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
up to 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Stress measured by Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Time Frame: baseline (pre-intervention), post-intervention (3 months), follow up (6 months)
PSS is a 10-item survey scored from 0 (never) to 4 (very often) for a total possible range of scores from 0-40 where higher scores indicate higher perceived stress.
baseline (pre-intervention), post-intervention (3 months), follow up (6 months)
Change in Burnout measured by Maslach Burnout Inventory
Time Frame: baseline (pre-intervention), post-intervention (3 months), follow up (6 months)
This is a 2-item survey scored from 0-6 where higher scores indicate increased burnout.
baseline (pre-intervention), post-intervention (3 months), follow up (6 months)
Change in Resilience measured by Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC 2)
Time Frame: baseline (pre-intervention), post-intervention (3 months), follow up (6 months)
CD-RISC 2 is a 2-item survey each scored on a 5 point likert scale from 0 (not true at all) to 4 (true nearly all of the time), higher scores indicate increased resilience.
baseline (pre-intervention), post-intervention (3 months), follow up (6 months)
Change in Well-being measured by Flourishing Index
Time Frame: baseline (pre-intervention), post-intervention (3 months), follow up (6 months)
Flourishing measure is a 12-item survey that measure well being in each of 6 domains: happiness and life satisfaction; mental and physical health; meaning and purpose; character and virtue; close social relationships; financial and material stability. Each domain is scored from 0 - 10 where higher numbers are indicative of increased well being.
baseline (pre-intervention), post-intervention (3 months), follow up (6 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lee Wilke, MD, FACS, UW Carbone Cancer Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2024-0517
  • Protocol Version (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
  • A539713 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Burn Out

3
Subscribe