Duke Virtual IntEgrated Workflow (Duke VIEW)

February 9, 2026 updated by: Duke University

DUH Innovation Units

This quality improvement initiative aims to evaluate the implementation, utilization, and impact of virtual care technologies and workflows being implemented at Duke University Health System (DUHS). This project is embedded within operational workflows and is designed to inform strategic decision-making and resource allocation. The evaluation will focus on key performance indicators (KPIs) relevant to hospital operations and patient outcomes, including but not limited to: Length of Stay, Readmission Rates, Patient Satisfaction Scores, and Other Quality and Safety Metrics. These KPIs will be evaluated across three clinical units at Duke University Hospital, in which virtual care technologies are being implemented. These will be compared to three control units of similar characteristics. Differences in KPIs will be examined across all units over 12 months.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

10000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients admitted to medical surgical floors

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Admission to the hospital on one of six clinical units

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Less than 18 years old

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Clinical Unit 1
All patient beds on clinical unit 1
Patient care delivered together with a bedside nurse and a virtual nurse
Clinical Unit 2
All patient beds on clinical unit 2
Patient care delivered together with a bedside nurse and a virtual nurse
Clinical Unit 3
All patient beds on clinical unit 3
Patient care delivered together with a bedside nurse and a virtual nurse
Clinical Unit 4
All patient beds on clinical unit 4
Clinical Unit 5
All patient beds on clinical unit 5
Clinical Unit 6
All patient beds on clinical unit 6

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Falls
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of patient falls in a hospital room
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Readmission rates
Time Frame: 12 months
Rate of readmission to the hospital after discharge
12 months
Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections
12 months
Hospital acquired pressure injury
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of hospital acquired pressure injuries
12 months
Venous thromboembolism
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of venous thromboembolisms
12 months
Nurse Turnover
Time Frame: 12 months
Rate of nurse turnover over time
12 months
Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-18)
Time Frame: 12 months
The PSQ is an 18-item survey designed for quick assessment of patient satisfaction with healthcare. Each item is scored on a Likert scale of 1 to 5 and has a total score range of 18 to 90, where a higher score indicates greater satisfaction.
12 months
Length of Stay
Time Frame: 12 months
Average length of stay
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ryan Shaw, PhD, Duke Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 4, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 3, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 3, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Study outcome measures will be shared

IPD Sharing Time Frame

IPD and supporting information will be available within three years of study completion and hosted at Duke University in the Duke Research Data Repository

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be made available publicly in accordance with the Duke Research Data Repository

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Satisfaction, Patient

Clinical Trials on Co-Care

Subscribe