Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Evaluation of Performance, Usability, and Reliability of a Novel Device for Continuous Collection of Physiological Data

22. januar 2019 oppdatert av: MC10 Inc.

A Study to Evaluate the Performance, Usability, and Reliability of a Novel Device for Continuous Collection of Physiological Data in Healthcare and Remote Settings

Study objective: The primary objective of the clinical investigation is to evaluate the accuracy of BioStamp nPoint system algorithm measurements.

Study design: A single-site, non-significant risk, open-label, prospective non-randomized clinical investigation designed to validate the accuracy of the various physiological parameters that the Wearable Sensor Patches acquire and the system processes.

Studieoversikt

Status

Fullført

Forhold

Intervensjon / Behandling

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Faktiske)

30

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

  • Forente stater
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, Forente stater, 45212
        • CTI Clinical Research Center

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

18 år til 99 år (Voksen, Eldre voksen)

Tar imot friske frivillige

Ja

Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female volunteers, at least 18 years of age at the time of screening visit;
  2. Fluent in English;
  3. The subject is willing to comply with the protocol specified evaluations;
  4. Subject is willing and cognitively able to sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy;
  2. Positive urine drug screen
  3. History of active (clinically significant) skin disorders;
  4. History of allergic response to silicones or adhesives;
  5. Subjects with electronic implants of any kind (e.g. pacemaker)
  6. History of sleep disorders or self-reported insomnia or other sleep conditions;
  7. Broken, damaged or irritated skin or rashes near the sensor application sites;
  8. Subjects that are MC10 employees or shareholders, or a spouse or child of an MC10 employee or shareholder;
  9. Subjects who are physically or cognitively unable to normally perform activities of daily living, assessed at the discretion of the investigator.

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Annen
  • Tildeling: N/A
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Enkeltgruppeoppdrag
  • Masking: Ingen (Open Label)

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Annen: Single Arm

This single arm consists of all subjects which will interact with the device under investigation as well as comparator devices.

This includes the Physiological signal monitor intervention, Heart rate and heart rate variability comparison device intervention, Respiration rate comparison device intervention, and Activity classification intervention.
Enhet: Physiological signal monitor
Wireless remote monitoring system intended for use by researchers and healthcare professionals for continuous collection of physiological data in home and healthcare settings.
Enhet: Heart rate and heart rate variability comparison device
FDA cleared reference device that monitors heart rate and heart rate variability in subjects
Enhet: Respiration rate comparison device
FDA cleared reference device that monitors respiration rate in subjects
Annen: Activity classification
Visual annotation of subject posture and other activities used for reference

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Accuracy of Heart Rate Measured in Beats Per Minute Compared to Reference Device
Tidsramme: 2 days after informed consent
Heart rate as measured by the subject device in beats per minute will be compared to the reference device. The Mean Absolute Error (MAE) between measurements from each device is presented.
2 days after informed consent
Accuracy of Heart Rate Variability Measured by Root Mean Square of Successive Differences (HRV RMSSD) Compared to the Reference Device
Tidsramme: 2 days after informed consent
Heart Rate Variability RMSSD is measured by the subject device determined by root mean square of successive differences in neighboring RR intervals and will be compared to the reference device. The Mean Absolute Error (MAE) between measurements from each device is presented.
2 days after informed consent
Accuracy of Heart Rate Variability Measured by Low Frequency Content to High Frequency Content Ratio (HRV Ratio) Compared to the Reference Device
Tidsramme: 2 days after informed consent
HRV Ratio as measured by the subject device determined by low frequency content to high frequency content ratio (HRV Ratio) in beats per minute will be compared to the reference device. The Mean Absolute Error (MAE) between measurements from each device is presented.
2 days after informed consent
Accuracy of Respiration Rate Measured in Breaths Per Minute Compared to the Reference Device
Tidsramme: 2 days after informed consent
Respiration rate as measured by the subject device in breaths per minute will be compared to the reference device. The Mean Absolute Error (MAE) between measurements from each device is presented.
2 days after informed consent
Accuracy of Activity Classification as Compared to Visual Annotation
Tidsramme: 2 days after informed consent
The device under test will classify a subjects activity into sleeping, standing, sitting, lying, walking and other activities as the subject performs various predefined activities, which are annotated by an observer. The device's Activity Classification will be compared to the observer's annotation. The percentage of correct classifications by the device against indicated visual observation is presented. The percent correct is not a per subject average, but is the percentage of all activity classifications which were correct when compared to ground truth observation.
2 days after informed consent
Accuracy of Step Count Compared to an Observer's Manual Count
Tidsramme: 2 days after informed consent
The number of steps reported by the device under test during a 6 minute walk test will be compared to an observer's manual count of the number of steps taken.
2 days after informed consent
Accuracy of Sleep Onset Time (Hours, Minutes, and Seconds), Sleep Wake Time (Hours, Minutes, and Seconds) as Compared to an Observer's Visual Annotation
Tidsramme: 2 days after informed consent
Sleep onset and wake times as reported by the device under test will be compared to an observer's visual annotation of the sleep onset and wake times. The Mean Absolute Error (MAE) between times as indicated by the device and observed times is presented.
2 days after informed consent
Accuracy of Posture Classification as Compared to Visual Annotation
Tidsramme: 2 days after informed consent
The device under test will classify a subjects activity into sleep posture, standing posture, and sitting posture as the subject performs various predefined activities, which are annotated by an observer. The device's Posture Classification will be compared to the observer's annotation. The percentage of correct classifications by the device against indicated visual observation is presented. The percent correct is not a per subject average, but is the percentage of all posture classifications which were correct when compared to ground truth observation.
2 days after informed consent
Number of Sensors That Remained Sufficiently Adhered to Subjects for 24 Hours as Assessed by a 5 Point Scale
Tidsramme: 2 days after informed consent
The level of sensor adhesion will be assessed by a 5 point scale (0- sensor is greater than or equal to 90% of sensor adhered, 4-sensor completely detached from subject). Sensors receiving scores of 0 and 1 will be determined to have acceptable adhesion, while scores of 2, 3, and 4 will be considered unacceptable adhesion. The percentage of sensors which had acceptable adhesion at sensor removal is presented.
2 days after informed consent

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Sponsor

MC10 Inc.

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

31. juli 2017

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

25. august 2017

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

30. august 2017

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

16. august 2017

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

17. august 2017

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

22. august 2017

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

25. januar 2019

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

22. januar 2019

Sist bekreftet

1. januar 2019

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Andre studie-ID-numre

  • MC10-PTL-103

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

NEI

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Ja

produkt produsert i og eksportert fra USA

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Kliniske studier på Sunne normaler

Kliniske studier på Physiological signal monitor

Søk i lignende forsøk

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

CROs by country

CROs in Bangladesh

Forhold

Sjeldne sykdommer

Legemiddelintervensjoner

Kosttilskudd

Sponsor / samarbeidspartnere

Steder

Abonnere