Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Evaluation of Performance, Usability, and Reliability of a Novel Device for Continuous Collection of Physiological Data

22. januar 2019 opdateret af: MC10 Inc.

A Study to Evaluate the Performance, Usability, and Reliability of a Novel Device for Continuous Collection of Physiological Data in Healthcare and Remote Settings

Study objective: The primary objective of the clinical investigation is to evaluate the accuracy of BioStamp nPoint system algorithm measurements.

Study design: A single-site, non-significant risk, open-label, prospective non-randomized clinical investigation designed to validate the accuracy of the various physiological parameters that the Wearable Sensor Patches acquire and the system processes.

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

30

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

  • Forenede Stater
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, Forenede Stater, 45212
        • CTI Clinical Research Center

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år til 99 år (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ja

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female volunteers, at least 18 years of age at the time of screening visit;
  2. Fluent in English;
  3. The subject is willing to comply with the protocol specified evaluations;
  4. Subject is willing and cognitively able to sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy;
  2. Positive urine drug screen
  3. History of active (clinically significant) skin disorders;
  4. History of allergic response to silicones or adhesives;
  5. Subjects with electronic implants of any kind (e.g. pacemaker)
  6. History of sleep disorders or self-reported insomnia or other sleep conditions;
  7. Broken, damaged or irritated skin or rashes near the sensor application sites;
  8. Subjects that are MC10 employees or shareholders, or a spouse or child of an MC10 employee or shareholder;
  9. Subjects who are physically or cognitively unable to normally perform activities of daily living, assessed at the discretion of the investigator.

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Andet
  • Tildeling: N/A
  • Interventionel model: Enkelt gruppeopgave
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Andet: Single Arm

This single arm consists of all subjects which will interact with the device under investigation as well as comparator devices.

This includes the Physiological signal monitor intervention, Heart rate and heart rate variability comparison device intervention, Respiration rate comparison device intervention, and Activity classification intervention.
Enhed: Physiological signal monitor
Wireless remote monitoring system intended for use by researchers and healthcare professionals for continuous collection of physiological data in home and healthcare settings.
Enhed: Heart rate and heart rate variability comparison device
FDA cleared reference device that monitors heart rate and heart rate variability in subjects
Enhed: Respiration rate comparison device
FDA cleared reference device that monitors respiration rate in subjects
Andet: Activity classification
Visual annotation of subject posture and other activities used for reference

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Accuracy of Heart Rate Measured in Beats Per Minute Compared to Reference Device
Tidsramme: 2 days after informed consent
Heart rate as measured by the subject device in beats per minute will be compared to the reference device. The Mean Absolute Error (MAE) between measurements from each device is presented.
2 days after informed consent
Accuracy of Heart Rate Variability Measured by Root Mean Square of Successive Differences (HRV RMSSD) Compared to the Reference Device
Tidsramme: 2 days after informed consent
Heart Rate Variability RMSSD is measured by the subject device determined by root mean square of successive differences in neighboring RR intervals and will be compared to the reference device. The Mean Absolute Error (MAE) between measurements from each device is presented.
2 days after informed consent
Accuracy of Heart Rate Variability Measured by Low Frequency Content to High Frequency Content Ratio (HRV Ratio) Compared to the Reference Device
Tidsramme: 2 days after informed consent
HRV Ratio as measured by the subject device determined by low frequency content to high frequency content ratio (HRV Ratio) in beats per minute will be compared to the reference device. The Mean Absolute Error (MAE) between measurements from each device is presented.
2 days after informed consent
Accuracy of Respiration Rate Measured in Breaths Per Minute Compared to the Reference Device
Tidsramme: 2 days after informed consent
Respiration rate as measured by the subject device in breaths per minute will be compared to the reference device. The Mean Absolute Error (MAE) between measurements from each device is presented.
2 days after informed consent
Accuracy of Activity Classification as Compared to Visual Annotation
Tidsramme: 2 days after informed consent
The device under test will classify a subjects activity into sleeping, standing, sitting, lying, walking and other activities as the subject performs various predefined activities, which are annotated by an observer. The device's Activity Classification will be compared to the observer's annotation. The percentage of correct classifications by the device against indicated visual observation is presented. The percent correct is not a per subject average, but is the percentage of all activity classifications which were correct when compared to ground truth observation.
2 days after informed consent
Accuracy of Step Count Compared to an Observer's Manual Count
Tidsramme: 2 days after informed consent
The number of steps reported by the device under test during a 6 minute walk test will be compared to an observer's manual count of the number of steps taken.
2 days after informed consent
Accuracy of Sleep Onset Time (Hours, Minutes, and Seconds), Sleep Wake Time (Hours, Minutes, and Seconds) as Compared to an Observer's Visual Annotation
Tidsramme: 2 days after informed consent
Sleep onset and wake times as reported by the device under test will be compared to an observer's visual annotation of the sleep onset and wake times. The Mean Absolute Error (MAE) between times as indicated by the device and observed times is presented.
2 days after informed consent
Accuracy of Posture Classification as Compared to Visual Annotation
Tidsramme: 2 days after informed consent
The device under test will classify a subjects activity into sleep posture, standing posture, and sitting posture as the subject performs various predefined activities, which are annotated by an observer. The device's Posture Classification will be compared to the observer's annotation. The percentage of correct classifications by the device against indicated visual observation is presented. The percent correct is not a per subject average, but is the percentage of all posture classifications which were correct when compared to ground truth observation.
2 days after informed consent
Number of Sensors That Remained Sufficiently Adhered to Subjects for 24 Hours as Assessed by a 5 Point Scale
Tidsramme: 2 days after informed consent
The level of sensor adhesion will be assessed by a 5 point scale (0- sensor is greater than or equal to 90% of sensor adhered, 4-sensor completely detached from subject). Sensors receiving scores of 0 and 1 will be determined to have acceptable adhesion, while scores of 2, 3, and 4 will be considered unacceptable adhesion. The percentage of sensors which had acceptable adhesion at sensor removal is presented.
2 days after informed consent

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

MC10 Inc.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

31. juli 2017

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

25. august 2017

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

30. august 2017

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

16. august 2017

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

17. august 2017

Først opslået (Faktiske)

22. august 2017

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

25. januar 2019

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

22. januar 2019

Sidst verificeret

1. januar 2019

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • MC10-PTL-103

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ja

produkt fremstillet i og eksporteret fra U.S.A.

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Sunde normaler

Kliniske forsøg med Physiological signal monitor

Søg i lignende forsøg

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

CROs by country

CROs in Kenya

Betingelser

Sjældne sygdomme

Narkotikainterventioner

Kosttilskud

Sponsor / samarbejdspartnere

Placeringer

Abonner