SH L 562BB Phase II/III Dose Justification and Gadoteridol-controlled Comparative Study

July 28, 2017 updated by: Bayer

Multi-center, Randomized, Controlled, Single-blind, Intra-individual Comparisons of 2 Dose of Gadobutrol 1.0 Molar and Gadoteridol (ProHance) Crossover Studies With Corresponding Blinded Image Evaluation Following Multiple Injections of 0.1 mmol/kg bw of Gadobutrol and Gadoteridol in Patients With Known or Suspected Brain Metastasis

This study is conducted to compare the contrast effect and safety of SH L562BB with ProHance, which has already been approved as a pharmaceutical product of similar indication.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
165

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Japan
      • Fukuoka, Japan, 812-8582
      • Osaka, Japan, 558-8558
    • Aichi
      • Nagoya, Aichi, Japan, 464-0021
    • Ehime
      • Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan, 791-0280
    • Fukuoka
      • Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan, 807-8555
    • Hokkaido
      • Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan, 060-8570
    • Hyogo
      • Kobe, Hyogo, Japan, 650-0047
    • Kanagawa
      • Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan, 228-8555
      • Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan, 222-0036
    • Osaka
      • Habikino, Osaka, Japan, 583-0852
      • Habikino, Osaka, Japan, 583-8588
      • Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan, 589-8511
    • Shizuoka
      • Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan, 430-8558
      • Sunto, Shizuoka, Japan, 411-8777
    • Tokyo
      • Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 113-8655
      • Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 113-8431
      • Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 104-0045
      • Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan, 181-8611
      • Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 141-0022
    • Tottori
      • Yonago, Tottori, Japan, 683-8504

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Japanese patients at least 20 years of age
  • Patients with diagnosed primary cancer
  • Patients with metastatic lesions by CT/MRI

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have contraindication to the MRI examinations
  • Patients who have severe renal disorder
  • Patients in extremely serious general condition

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg bw
Participants received first injection (intravenous [i.v.]) of gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg body weight (bw), corresponding to a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg bw
Drug: Gadobutrol (Gadavist, Gadovist, BAY86-4875)
Gadobutrol enhanced MRI (first injection of gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg bw, corresponding to a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg bw)
Drug: Gadobutrol (Gadavist, Gadovist, BAY86-4875)
Gadobutrol enhanced MRI (second injection of gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg bw, corresponding to a total dose of 0.2 mmol/kg bw)
EXPERIMENTAL: Gadobutrol 0.2 mmol/kg bw
Participants received second injection (i.v.) of gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg bw, corresponding to a total dose of 0.2 mmol/kg bw. The interval of two bolus injections is 13-15 min
Drug: Gadobutrol (Gadavist, Gadovist, BAY86-4875)
Gadobutrol enhanced MRI (first injection of gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg bw, corresponding to a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg bw)
Drug: Gadobutrol (Gadavist, Gadovist, BAY86-4875)
Gadobutrol enhanced MRI (second injection of gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg bw, corresponding to a total dose of 0.2 mmol/kg bw)
EXPERIMENTAL: Gadoteridol (ProHance)
Participants received two injections (i.v.) of gadoteridol 0.1 mmol/kg bw, corresponding to a total dose of 0.2 mmol/kg bw. The interval of two bolus injections is 13-15 min
Drug: ProHance
ProHance enhanced MRI (two injections of gadoteridol 0.1 mmol/kg bw, corresponding to a total dose of 0.2 mmol/kg bw)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Lesions Detected by Blinded Readers (BR) and Investigator
Time Frame: one day
Number of metastatic lesions (unenhanced and enhanced) per participant detected on postcontrast Magnetic resonance (MR) images by averaged blinded reader and investigator
one day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Score of Visibility Assessment - Degree of Lesion Contrast Enhancement by Blinded Reader
Time Frame: one day
Degree of contrast enhancement for each lesion on postcontrast MR images using the 4-point scale by averaged blinded reader (Score 1=No, 2=Moderate, 3=Good, 4=Excellent)
one day
Score of Visibility Assessment - Degree of Lesion Contrast Enhancement by Investigator
Time Frame: one day
Degree of contrast enhancement for each lesion on postcontrast MR images using the 4-point scale by investigator (Score 1=No, 2=Moderate, 3=Good, 4=Excellent)
one day
Score of Visibility Assessment - Border Delineation by Blinded Reader
Time Frame: one day
Border delineation for each lesion on postcontrast MR images using the 4-point scale by averaged blinded reader (Score 1=None, 2=Moderate, 3=Good, 4=Excellent)
one day
Score of Visibility Assessment - Border Delineation by Investigator
Time Frame: one day
Border delineation for each lesion on postcontrast MR images using the 4-point scale by investigator (Score 1=None, 2=Moderate, 3=Good, 4=Excellent)
one day
Treatment Planning Confidence - Gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg bw vs. Gadoteridol (ProHance) 0.2 mmol/kg bw by Treatment Planning Experts (TPE)
Time Frame: one day
Treatment planning confidence evaluated separately for each image set (gadobutrol [Gado-] 0.1 mmol/kg bw and gadoteridol [Pro-] 0.2 mmol/kg) by TPE (category: not confident, confident, and not assessable)
one day
Treatment Planning Confidence - Gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg bw vs. Gadoteridol (ProHance) 0.2 mmol/kg bw by Investigator
Time Frame: one day
Treatment planning confidence evaluated separately for each image set (gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg bw and gadoteridol 0.2 mmol/kg) by investigator (category: not confident, confident, and not assessable)
one day
Treatment Planning Confidence - Gadobutrol 0.2 mmol/kg bw vs. Gadoteridol (ProHance) 0.2 mmol/kg bw by TPE
Time Frame: one day
Treatment planning confidence evaluated separately for each image set (gadobutrol 0.2 mmol/kg bw and gadoteridol 0.2 mmol/kg) by TPE (category: not confident, confident, and not assessable)
one day
Treatment Planning Confidence - Gadobutrol 0.2 mmol/kg bw vs. Gadoteridol (ProHance) 0.2 mmol/kg bw by Investigator
Time Frame: one day
Treatment planning confidence evaluated separately for each image set (gadobutrol 0.2 mmol/kg bw and gadoteridol 0.2 mmol/kg) by investigator (category: not confident, confident, and not assessable)
one day
Number of Participants With Performance in Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) Planning by TPE
Time Frame: one day
Comparison of overall image quality for SRS treatment planning between gadobutrol and gadoteridol by TPE
one day
Number of Participants With Performance in Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) Planning by Investigator
Time Frame: one day
Comparison of overall image quality for SRS treatment planning between gadobutrol and gadoteridol by investigator
one day
Number of Participants With Reasons for Performance in SRS Planning by TPE
Time Frame: one day
Reasons for comparison results of overall image quality for SRS treatment planning between gadobutrol and gadoteridol by investigator (multiple answers applicable)
one day
Number of Participants With Reasons for Performance in SRS Planning by Investigator
Time Frame: one day
Reasons for comparison results of overall image quality for SRS treatment planning between gadobutrol and gadoteridol by investigator (multiple answers applicable)
one day
Lesion Size Evaluated by Independent Radiologist
Time Frame: one day
Size of each lesion on postcontrast MR images evaluated by independent radiologist (mean and standard deviation of 603 lesions)
one day
Contrast Noise Ratio (CNR) of Lesions Evaluated by Independent Radiologist
Time Frame: one day
CNR of lesion/normal white matter based on the signal intensity of MR images evaluated by independent radiologist (mean and standard deviation of 306 lesions)
one day
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) Among 3 Blinded Readers on the Number of Detected Lesions
Time Frame: one day
ICC among 3 blinded readers calculated for number of detected lesions using the statistical model with two random effects, i.e., blinded readers and individual patients.
one day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Bayer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2007

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2008

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 29, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 29, 2007

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 30, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 28, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 28, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 91569
  • 310864 (OTHER: Company internal)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Metastases

Clinical Trials on Gadobutrol (Gadavist, Gadovist, BAY86-4875)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings