Evaluation of Azacitidine in Transfusion Dependent Patients With Low-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML)

October 28, 2013 updated by: Nordic MDS Group

Clinical and Biological Evaluation of Azacitidine in Transfusion-dependent Patients With Low and Intermediate-1 Risk MDS, and Low-risk CMML, Who Are Either Refractory to or Not Eligible for Treatment With Erythropoietin +/- G-CSF

Azacitidine has proved prolonged overall survival in patients with high-risk MDS. Minor pilot studies have shown that treatment with Azacitidine can induce transfusion independency in previous transfusion dependent patients with low-risk MDS. This study will evaluate the effect of Azacitidine in transfusion dependent patients with low-risk MDS (IPSS low or int-1) or low risk CMML. Included patients should first have failed, or considered not being eligible to, treatment with EPO +/- G-CSF. Our hypothesis is that Azacitidine can lead to transfusion independency in this group of patients. Those patients who do not respond to treatment with Azacitidine alone, will be given treatment with the combination of Azacitidine and EPO where our hypothesis is that Azacitidine can restore sensitivity to EPO.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Denmark
      • Aalborg, Denmark
        • Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital
      • Aarhus, Denmark
        • Department of Hematology, Aarhus Univsersity Hospital
      • Copenhagen, Denmark
        • Department of Hematology, Rigshospitalet Univsersity Hospital
      • Herlev, Denmark
        • Department of Hematology, Herlev Hospital
      • Odense, Denmark
        • Department of Hematology, Odense University Hospital
  • Norway
      • Bergen, Norway
        • Department of Medcine, Haukeland University Hospital
      • Oslo, Norway
        • Department of Hematology, Rikshospitalet University Hospital
  • Sweden
      • Eskilstuna, Sweden
        • Department of Medicine, Mälarsjukhuset Hospital
      • Falun, Sweden
        • Department of medicine, Falun Hospital
      • Göteborg, Sweden
        • Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital / Östra
      • Linköping, Sweden
        • Department of Hematology, Linköping University Hospital
      • Luleå, Sweden
        • Department of Medicine, Sunderbyn Hospital
      • Lund, Sweden
        • Department of Hematology, Lund University Hospital
      • Stockholm, Sweden
        • Department of Hematology, Karolinska University Hospital
      • Stockholm, Sweden
        • Department of Medicine, Södersjukhuset Hospital
      • Umeå, Sweden
        • Department of Medicine, Umeå University Hospital
      • Uppsala, Sweden
        • Department of Medicine, Uppsala University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent form
  • MDS at IPSS Low or Int-1, or mixed MDS/MPD; either CMML with < 10% marrow blasts or RARS-T
  • Patients with high or intermediate probability for response according to the predictive model (see Hellstrom-Lindberg et al, Br J Haematol 99:344-51 1997)should be refractory to EPO / darbepoetin (equivalent to > 60 000 U of EPO / week for > 8 weeks) followed by EPO + G-CSF for > 8 weeks, or biosimilar drugs in equipotent doses, or EPO + G-CSF upfront for 8 weeks. Patients with low probability for response according to the predictive model, could be included without prior EPO/G-CSF treatment
  • Transfusion need >4 units over the last 8 weeks, or >8 units over the last 26 weeks.
  • Subject has signed the informed consent document.
  • Men and women of childbearing potential must use effective contraception during, and for up to 3 months after treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating females.
  • Patients who are eligible for curative treatment
  • Expected survival less than 24 weeks.
  • Symptomatic thrombocytopenia / active bleeding
  • Patients with JAK-2 positive RARS-T if eligible for new investigational drugs

  • Serum biochemical values as follows

    1. Serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL (177 micromol/L)
    2. Serum aminotransferase (AST)/serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) or alanine transaminase (ALT)/serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT) >3.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
    3. Serum total bilirubin >1.5 mg/dL (26 micromol/L)
  • Uncontrolled systemic infection
  • Considered not capable of following the study protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Azacitidine +/- erythropoetin
Drug: Azacitidine
100 mg / m(2) subcutaneously day 1-5 every 4 weeks for 6 cycles. Another three cycles will be given together with epo for those not responding to the first 6 cycles of Azacitidine
Drug: Erythropoetin
For those patients not responding to Azacitidine alone, the combination of Azacitidine and erythropoetin 60 000 U / week for 16 weeks will be given.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Hemoglobin level
Time Frame: Week 28
Week 28
Number of patients reaching transfusion independency after treatment with Azacitidine
Time Frame: Week 28
Week 28

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Effect on leucocyte, platelet count
Time Frame: Week 28 and End of Trial
Week 28 and End of Trial
Effect on bone marrow morphology and cytogenetics
Time Frame: Week 28 and End of Trial
Week 28 and End of Trial
Number of patients reaching transfusion independency after treatment with Azacitidine and Epo
Time Frame: End of Trial
End of Trial
Effect on genetic and epigenetic profile
Time Frame: Week 28
Week 28
Hemoglobin level
Time Frame: End of Trial
End of Trial

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Nordic MDS Group

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Magnus Tobiasson, M.D., Nordic MDS Group

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 12, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 12, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 13, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 29, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 28, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NMDSG08A
  • 2009-011483-11 (EudraCT Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Azacitidine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings