Cosmetic Outcome Study of Lid Laceration Repair With Suture Versus Tissue Adhesive
Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Tissue Adhesive (Octyl-2-Cyanoacrylate) vs. Traditional Suture in Traumatic Lid Laceration Repair
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- Memorial Hermann Hospital - Texas Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age or older.
- Any laceration caused by trauma and involving the skin of the upper and/or lower eyelid.
- Must be able to understand and sign an informed consent when applicable and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act(HIPAA) form that has been approved by an Institutional Review Board (IRB) or follow standard informed consent procedure of the IRB
Exclusion Criteria:
- Eyelid lacerations that include avulsion or missing eyelid tissue
- Patients with known hypersensitivity to octyl-2-cyanoacrylate or previous poor reaction to octyl-2-cyanoacrylate
- Eyelid lacerations resulting in necrosis or ischemia of tissue prior to repair
- Patients who demonstrate intoxication or mental status changes that would make them unfit to provide informed consent for repair
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Non-absorbable suture skin closure
The superficial eyelid skin will be repaired with simple interrupted sutures with non-absorbable suture (6-0 polypropylene) after repair of any deep component of the laceration.
|
The approach to repair will follow standard technique.
If eyelid marginal component is present, margin repair will be performed with two 6-0 interrupted silk sutures: one at the gray line and one at the lash line.
If the tarsus requires reapproximation, this will carefully be done using interrupted polyglactin vicryl sutures.
The superficial skin will then be repaired with either non-absorbable sutures (6-0 polypropylene).
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Absorbable suture skin closure
The superficial eyelid skin will be repaired with simple interrupted sutures with absorbable suture (surgical gut) after repair of any deep component of the laceration.
|
The approach to repair will follow standard technique.
If eyelid marginal component is present, margin repair will be performed with two 6-0 interrupted silk sutures: one at the gray line and one at the lash line.
If the tarsus requires reapproximation, this will carefully be done using interrupted polyglactin vicryl sutures.
The superficial skin will then be repaired with absorbable sutures (surgical gut).
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Tissue Adhesive skin closure
The superficial eyelid skin will be repaired with layers of tissue adhesive (octyl-2-cyanoacrylate) after repair of any deep component of the laceration.
|
The approach to repair will follow standard technique.
If eyelid marginal component is present, margin repair will be performed with two 6-0 interrupted silk sutures: one at the gray line and one at the lash line.
If the tarsus requires reapproximation, this will carefully be done using interrupted polyglactin vicryl sutures.
The superficial skin will then be repaired with tissue adhesive (octyl-2-cyanoacrylate).
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cosmetic wound appearance
Time Frame: 1 month after repair
|
Cosmetic appearance will be assessed using two wound assessment methods: the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale (HWES).
|
1 month after repair
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Judianne Kellaway, MD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Quinn JV, Drzewiecki AE, Stiell IG, Elmslie TJ. Appearance scales to measure cosmetic outcomes of healed lacerations. Am J Emerg Med. 1995 Mar;13(2):229-31. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(95)90100-0.
- Singer AJ, Arora B, Dagum A, Valentine S, Hollander JE. Development and validation of a novel scar evaluation scale. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Dec;120(7):1892-1897. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000287275.15511.10.
- Gilbert L, Pogorzalek N, Jounda G, Barreau E. [Traumatic peri-ocular injuries: closing wounds using 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate medical glue]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2009 May;32(5):341-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2009.03.024. Epub 2009 May 17. French.
- Greene D, Koch RJ, Goode RL. Efficacy of octyl-2-cyanoacrylate tissue glue in blepharoplasty. A prospective controlled study of wound-healing characteristics. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 1999 Oct-Dec;1(4):292-6. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.1.4.292.
- Handschel JG, Depprich RA, Dirksen D, Runte C, Zimmermann A, Kubler NR. A prospective comparison of octyl-2-cyanoacrylate and suture in standardized facial wounds. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Apr;35(4):318-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2005.10.003. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
- Shivamurthy DM, Singh S, Reddy S. Comparison of octyl-2-cyanoacrylate and conventional sutures in facial skin closure. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jan;1(1):15-9. doi: 10.4103/0975-5950.69151.
- Hollander JE, Singer AJ, Valentine S, Henry MC. Wound registry: development and validation. Ann Emerg Med. 1995 May;25(5):675-85. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70183-4. Erratum In: Ann Emerg Med 1995 Oct;26(4):532.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- HSC-MS-13-0276
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Eyelid Laceration
-
NCT07068880RecruitingFlexor Tendon Laceration
-
NCT06910241Recruiting
-
NCT03628690Unknown
-
NCT04536493CompletedLET | Laceration of Skin
-
NCT03880552CompletedPerineal Laceration Involving Skin | Delivery; Trauma
-
NCT03641053CompletedWounds and Injuries | Wound Heal | Laceration Face | Laceration Arm | Laceration of Leg
-
NCT06949189CompletedInfection | Nail Bed Injury | Laceration Repair | Laceration Repair, Children
-
NCT01948908CompletedChildren Requiring Sedation to Facilitate Laceration Repair
-
NCT00223119TerminatedPerineal Laceration Repair
Clinical Trials on Non-absorbable suture skin closure
-
NCT07383623Recruiting
-
NCT06344962Recruiting
-
NCT01679379CompletedSurgical Site Infection
-
NCT07569237Not yet recruitingWound Healing | Patient Comfort | Suture Materials | Oral Health-Related Quality of Life
-
NCT07413796RecruitingGlioma | Glioblastoma | Meningioma | Brain Tumor Adult | Brain Tumor Benign
-
NCT00933829WithdrawnLacerations | Injuries | Wounds
-
NCT06845735RecruitingHip Arthroscopy | Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome | Labrum Injury of the Hip Joint
-
NCT01907542Unknown
-
NCT05760794Active, not recruitingProlapse; Female