Cognitive Sequelae of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for the Treatment of Breast Cancer in Older Women

October 3, 2017 updated by: Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women with the majority receiving an endocrine therapy (ET) in the adjuvant setting. ETs dramatically reduce recurrence and improve survival but given the aging population and increased survivorship, there are growing concerns regarding the cognitive effects of ETs since estrogen is neuroprotective. A critical unanswered question is whether there are differences in cognitive decline between the two classes of ETs, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs - tamoxifen) and aromatase inhibitors (letrozole and anastrozole), in older women at greater risk of hormone receptor breast cancer and cognitive decline. Before a large multicentre observational study can be undertaken the investigators are proposing a feasibility study to establish metrics on participation, retention and adherence rates and parameter estimates to inform sample size calculation required to detect cognitive differences between the two ET classes. A convenience sample of chemotherapy-naïve patients, aged 65 and older, with early stage disease, 25 on a SERM and 50 on an aromatase inhibitor, will be assessed cognitively at baseline and after one year.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The convenience sample will consist of chemotherapy-naïve women 65 and older with a first diagnosis of early stage HR+ BC, post surgical resection, who are prescribed either TAM (n=25) or an AI, anastrozole or letrozole (n=50). Based on a survey of medical oncologist prescribing practices at Sunnybrook, the investigators will be able to obtain sufficient numbers for the convenience sample from the pool of 220 older women with BC referred annually to medical and radiation oncology at the Louise Temerty Breast Cancer Clinic and the Odette Cancer Centre . The investigators will recruit consecutively seen eligible patients before radiotherapy. Experienced clinical trial staff will identify eligible patients from the clinic list of each medical and radiation oncologist, who will then introduce the study during the visit. The Research Coordinator (RC) will meet with interested patients for consent to conduct the screening assessment for signs of cognitive impairment using the Memory Impairment Screen (MIS), a sensitive and reliable tool. The MIS will take no more than 5 minutes and will be conducted in a private room at either the Louise Temerty Breast Cancer Centre or the Odette Cancer Centre depending on the location of the patient's appointment. The RC will then obtain consent from all those who pass the MIS to participate in the study and arrange for testing. The RC will administer the assessment battery at a time convenient to the patient, before radiotherapy. Drug adherence rates will be obtained using monthly telephone self-reports. After 1 year, participants will undergo the same testing protocol as at baseline using alternate forms where possible. The RC will document how many continue to meet study criteria including changes in health status, medications, etc. The investigators do not expect any major selection biases between our groups. While exclusion of women co-administered chemotherapy due to its confounding effects on cognition may bias the sample by including more women with co-morbidities, this potential bias should be reduced by our exclusion of previous cancers, life expectancy <2 years, and central nervous system (CNS) disorders. To determine bias in attrition of women at year 1 due to cognitive impairment, the investigators will contact all participants and caregivers who do not return to determine the reason.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
47

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
        • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

chemotherapy-naïve women 65 and older with a first diagnosis of early stage HR+ BC, post surgical resection, who are prescribed either tamoxifen, anastrozole or letrozole.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Postmenopausal female, age 65 and older
  • No more than 14 weeks post surgical resection for early stage histologically confirmed hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) (i.e., Tumour size 1-2, Node status 0-1, Metastasis 0). HR+ BC defined as >1% positive cell staining
  • Prescribed either tamoxifen, letrozole, or anastrozole
  • Fluent in written and spoken English; >grade 5 education; can read large print (with or without correction); can hear normal conversation (with or without a hearing aid)
  • Capacity to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Initiated adjuvant ET more than one week before baseline assessment
  • Chemotherapy (neoadjuvant or adjuvant)
  • More than one treatment of radiotherapy before baseline assessment
  • Hormone replacement therapy use 4 weeks prior to baseline assessment
  • Previous breast cancer or metastatic disease or other malignancy, other than any cancers treated for cure >5 years ago and not having recurred except non-melanoma skin cancers; previous chemotherapy; previous use of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERM) or aromatase inhibitor (AI); distant metastases
  • History of or active known CNS disease (e.g. known diagnosis of stroke, Parkinson's), medical condition impairing cognitive function, including active treatment with medication known to affect cognition, or signs of cognitive impairment on the Memory Impairment Screen
  • History or active known diagnosis of major psychiatric disorder in the last 10 years including bipolar disease, schizophrenia, major depression or self-reported hospitalization for psychiatric illness, alcoholism, or history of alcohol or drug abuse
  • Life expectancy less than two years, acutely ill or delirious

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Tamoxifen
Chemotherapy-naïve women 65 and older with a first diagnosis of early stage HR+ BC, post surgical resection prescribed tamoxifen.
Other: Neuropsychological test battery
Participants will have been prescribed their endocrine therapy for the treatment of breast cancer prior to enrollment. Neuropsychological test batteries will be administered at baseline and at one-year follow-up to assess changes in cognition.
Aromatase Inhibitors
Chemotherapy-naïve women 65 and older with a first diagnosis of early stage HR+ BC, post surgical resection prescribed aromatase inhibitors.
Other: Neuropsychological test battery
Participants will have been prescribed their endocrine therapy for the treatment of breast cancer prior to enrollment. Neuropsychological test batteries will be administered at baseline and at one-year follow-up to assess changes in cognition.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The proportion of patients who experience cognitive impairment after 1 year of treatment
Time Frame: 1 year
Cognitive impairment will be defined as scoring at or below -1.5 standard deviations from the normative mean on two or more tests, or as scoring at or below -2.0 standard deviations on a single test.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mary C. Tierney, PhD, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
  • Principal Investigator: Kathleen Pritchard, MD, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 11, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 23, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 24, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 5, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 3, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 130-2015

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings