Premotor Cortex: A New Target for Stroke Motor Rehabilitation
Premotor Cortex: A New Target for Stroke Motor Rehabilitation Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Cathrin Buetefisch, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 404-712-5507
- Email: cathrin.buetefisch@emory.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Farrah E Rink, MHSc
- Email: farrah.rink@emory.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
- Emory University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Motor training only (pilot participants):
- Have the ability to give informed, written consent
- Be aged 18-80 years old
- Be right-handed using the Edinburgh handedness inventory
- Have intact cognitive abilities (score higher than 75th percentile on the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS))
- No current depression (score less than 7 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS))
- No neurological disease
- No contradictions to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
- TMS over the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) hotspot must evoke a motor evoked potential (MEP) in the ECU muscle
- MEP amplitude must increase by at least 20% as the TMS intensity increases
- The subjects must be comfortable when receiving TMS of all strengths.
Remaining study participants:
- Have the ability to give informed, written consent
- Be aged 55-80 years old
- Be right-handed using the Edinburgh handedness inventory
- Have intact cognitive abilities (score higher than 75th percentile on the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS))
- No current depression (score less than a 7 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS))
- No neurological disease
- No contradictions to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
- TMS over the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) hotspot must be able to evoke a motor evoked potential (MEP) in the ECU muscle
- MEP amplitude must increase by at least 20% as the TMS intensity increases
- The subjects must be comfortable when receiving TMS of all strengths.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Impaired cognitive abilities (score lesser than 75th percentile on the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS))
- Current depression (score more than 7 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS))
- Neurological disease
- Has a contradiction to TMS
- MEP cannot be evoked with TMS in the ECU muscle
- Inability to tolerate one or more TMS strengths
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Single motor training only
For a pilot experiment, healthy, right-handed subjects will complete one testing session.
During the testing session, subjects will complete motor training.
The results of this experiment will determine the motor training protocol used in the main experiment.
|
During motor training, participants will quickly extend their hand at a pace of one extension every 5 seconds (0.2Hz) in response to an auditory cue.
|
|
Experimental: Repetitive TMS during motor training
Healthy, right-handed subjects will complete five testing sessions.
During each testing session, subjects will complete motor training while receiving one of five repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocols.
Subjects will receive a different rTMS protocol at each testing session.
By the end of the study, each subject will have received all rTMS protocols.
|
During motor training, participants will quickly extend their hand at a pace of one extension every 5 seconds (0.2Hz) in response to an auditory cue.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in wrist acceleration
Time Frame: Baseline, post-motor training (1 minute, 30 minutes and 60 minutes after completion of motor training)
|
The subjects will be asked to perform 7 isometric wrist extensions before and after motor training.
Wrist acceleration will be measured by a gyroscope taped to the dorsum of the subject's hand undergoing motor training.
An increase in the maximum acceleration that persists at least an hour after training is indicative of motor learning.
We will compare the effect of the rTMS protocols on the change in the wrist acceleration associated with motor learning (baseline to post 1 min, baseline to post 30 mins, baseline to post 60 mins).
|
Baseline, post-motor training (1 minute, 30 minutes and 60 minutes after completion of motor training)
|
|
Change in stimulus response curve (SRC)
Time Frame: Baseline, post-motor training (1 minute, 30 minutes and 60 minutes after completion of motor training)
|
The stimulus response curve (SRC) is a set of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) collected in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulses of increasing intensities.
The SRC can characterize input-output parameters of the corticospinal tract and organization of the primary motor cortex.
A change in the SRC parameters after training will reflect a change in the organization of the primary motor cortex associated with motor learning.
We will compare the effect of the rTMS protocols on the change in the SRC parameters associated with motor learning (baseline to post 1 min, baseline to post 30 mins, baseline to post 60 mins).
|
Baseline, post-motor training (1 minute, 30 minutes and 60 minutes after completion of motor training)
|
|
Change in short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI)
Time Frame: Baseline, post-motor training (1 minute, 30 minutes and 60 minutes after completion of motor training)
|
Short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) is an inhibitory phenomenon in the motor cortex.
To test for SICI, a sub-threshold conditioning stimulus (CS) will precede a supra-threshold test stimulus (TS) by 2 milliseconds (ms).
The amplitude of a conditioned TS-evoked MEP will be expressed as a percent of the amplitude of an unconditioned TS-evoked MEP.
A decrease in the percent MEP after training would indicate a increase in SICI.
An increase in the percent MEP after training would indicate a decrease in SICI.
We will compare the effect of the rTMS protocols on the change in SICI associated with motor learning (baseline to post 1 min, baseline to post 30 mins, baseline to post 60 mins).
|
Baseline, post-motor training (1 minute, 30 minutes and 60 minutes after completion of motor training)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in wrist force
Time Frame: Baseline, post-motor training (1 minute, 30 minutes and 60 minutes after completion of motor training)
|
The subjects will be asked to perform 7 isometric wrist extensions before and after motor training.
A force transducer transducer will record the maximum force produced during the wrist extensions.
|
Baseline, post-motor training (1 minute, 30 minutes and 60 minutes after completion of motor training)
|
|
Change in reaction time
Time Frame: Baseline and post-motor training (1 minute, 30 minutes and 60 minutes after completion of motor training)
|
Subjects will be asked to perform 7 auditory-cued ballistic wrist extensions before and after motor training.
Electomyographic (EMG) activity recorded during the ballistic wrist extensions will be used to measure reaction time.
Reaction time is the length of time between the auditory cue and the onset of the movement-related EMG burst of the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) muscle.
|
Baseline and post-motor training (1 minute, 30 minutes and 60 minutes after completion of motor training)
|
|
Change in task accuracy
Time Frame: Baseline and post-motor training (1 minute after completion of motor training)
|
Task accuracy will be determined by the number of successful trials over the number of total trials.
A trial will be considered successful when the subject moves a cursor from the home position into a target box by modulating the acceleration of their wrist.
An increase in task accuracy after training will indicate motor learning.
|
Baseline and post-motor training (1 minute after completion of motor training)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00081901
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
NCT07208422RecruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke Ischemic | Hemiparesis After Stroke
-
NCT07224178RecruitingHemorrhagic Stroke | Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source | Ischemic Stroke, Cryptogenic | Recurrent Ischemic Stroke | Ischemic Stroke, Embolic
-
NCT07433972Not yet recruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke Survivors
-
NCT07236216RecruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke Patient
-
NCT04956185RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke Hemorrhagic
-
NCT05046106Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
NCT07353203CompletedChronic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Exoskeleton
-
NCT07199322Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Upper Limb Rehabilitation | Stroke Ischemic
-
NCT06127602RecruitingStroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, Cerebrovascular
-
NCT05815368RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke Hemorrhagic
Clinical Trials on Motor Training
-
NCT04786132UnknownCognitive Change | Proprioception Change | Balance Change
-
NCT02403817CompletedAutism Spectrum Disorder | Autistic Disorder
-
NCT05710588Recruiting
-
NCT06299345Completed
-
NCT06057584Recruiting
-
NCT07641569Not yet recruitingParkinson's Disease (PD)
-
NCT07411365Not yet recruitingMild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) | PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder)
-
NCT07232862Recruiting