Motor Imagery for Reach-to-grasp Rehabilitation After Tetraplegia
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Saint-Genis-Laval, France, 69230
- Hôpital Henry Gabrielle - Médecine physique et Réadaptation, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 20 Route de Vourles,
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18-55 years old,
- quadriplegia elicited by spinal cord injury (SCI) at the C5, C5-C6, C6, or C6-C7 level,
- complete infra-lesional motor deficit according to the ASIA impairment scale with finger and forearm flexor muscles paralysis,
- post-traumatic period >6 months (since a motor recovery plateau is usually reached at 6-month post-SCI
Exclusion Criteria:
- non-stabilized hypertension or pathological autonomic nervous system dysfunction (e.g., orthostatic hypotension),
- cerebral damage and/or cognitive deficit,
- elbow or shoulder joint amplitude restriction, upper limb para-osteoarthropathy,
- participation to another study
- presence of metallic objects within the body incompatible with MEG or functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) recordings.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: C6-C7 patients
C6-C7 patients able to recover tenodesis grasp.
|
Intervention consisted of supervised MI during which the participants were trained to imagine performing a single-joint wrist extension movement and a multiple-joint reach-to-grasp movement using tenodesis.
The two movements were practiced in separate blocks and each 45 minute MI session consisted of six to eight blocks.
Within a given block patients; i) performed the movement once, ii) imagined it using visual imagery (between five and ten repetitions), iii) performed the movement again, and iv) imagined it using kinesthetic imagery (between five and ten repetitions).
All movements (performed and imagined) were timed by the experimenter to ensure that the durations of both imagined and physically practiced movements were similar.
Imagery vividness was controlled with self-rated assessments using a visual analogic scale (from 0, the image or feeling was absent, to 10 when it was as clear or intense as physical practice).
|
|
Experimental: C5-C6 patients
C5-C6 patients for whom surgery for rehabilitation of an upper limb is indicated with a upper limit of one year after trauma, and after complete clinical and functional evaluation
|
Intervention consisted of supervised MI during which the participants were trained to imagine performing a single-joint wrist extension movement and a multiple-joint reach-to-grasp movement using tenodesis.
The two movements were practiced in separate blocks and each 45 minute MI session consisted of six to eight blocks.
Within a given block patients; i) performed the movement once, ii) imagined it using visual imagery (between five and ten repetitions), iii) performed the movement again, and iv) imagined it using kinesthetic imagery (between five and ten repetitions).
All movements (performed and imagined) were timed by the experimenter to ensure that the durations of both imagined and physically practiced movements were similar.
Imagery vividness was controlled with self-rated assessments using a visual analogic scale (from 0, the image or feeling was absent, to 10 when it was as clear or intense as physical practice).
|
|
No Intervention: Control group
a control group (n=6) matched on age and sex to C6-C7 without medical history or neurological disorder
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Motor imagery ability
Time Frame: 10 weeks
|
Motor imagery ability assessed by magnetoencephalography measurements
|
10 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Movement time (MT)
Time Frame: 10 weeks
|
Kinematic parameters of movement: temporal parameters: movement time (MT)
|
10 weeks
|
|
absolute time to peak velocity
Time Frame: 10 weeks
|
Kinematic parameters of movement: temporal parameters: absolute time to peak velocity
|
10 weeks
|
|
movement amplitude at peak velocity
Time Frame: 10 weeks
|
Kinematic parameters of movement: temporal parameters: movement amplitude at peak velocity
|
10 weeks
|
|
time to opening
Time Frame: 10 weeks
|
Kinematic parameters of movement: temporal parameters: time to opening
|
10 weeks
|
|
time to maximal opening
Time Frame: 10 weeks
|
Kinematic parameters of movement: temporal parameters: time to maximal opening
|
10 weeks
|
|
amplitude of maximal opening
Time Frame: 10 weeks
|
Kinematic parameters of movement: temporal parameters: amplitude of maximal opening
|
10 weeks
|
|
Trajectory of movement measured in the XY plane
Time Frame: 10 weeks
|
Kinematic parameters of movement: spatial parameters: Trajectory of movement measured in the XY plane
|
10 weeks
|
|
height of elbow and wrist at the moment of grasping an object, measured in mm in the YZ plane
Time Frame: 10 weeks
|
Kinematic parameters of movement: spatial parameters: height of elbow and wrist at the moment of grasping an object, measured in mm in the YZ plane
|
10 weeks
|
|
muscular force evaluated by muscle testing performed by a physiotherapist
Time Frame: 10 weeks
|
muscular force evaluated by muscle testing performed by a physiotherapist (score from 0 to 5)
|
10 weeks
|
|
joint amplitude evaluated in degrees (°) by the physiotherapist
Time Frame: 10 weeks
|
10 weeks
|
|
|
Box and Block test
Time Frame: 10 weeks
|
Box and Block test performed by an occupational therapist
|
10 weeks
|
|
Minnesota test.
Time Frame: 10 weeks
|
Minnesota test performed by an occupational therapist
|
10 weeks
|
|
amplitude of electrodermal responses
Time Frame: 10 weeks
|
mental chronometric assessment associated with acquisition of electrodermal responses
|
10 weeks
|
|
duration of electrodermal responses
Time Frame: 10 weeks
|
mental chronometric assessment associated with acquisition of electrodermal responses
|
10 weeks
|
|
Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire
Time Frame: 10 weeks
|
The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ) will allow a qualitative evaluation of the mental representation capacity of patients
|
10 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gilles RODE, Pr, Hospices Civils de Lyon
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2008-541
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Tetraplegia C5-C6
-
NCT03190863RecruitingIndividuals With C6-C7 Tetraplegia (AIS A or B)
-
NCT07429981Not yet recruitingCervical Radiculopathy | Cervical Radiculopathy at C5 Nerve Root | Cervical Radiculopathy at C6 Nerve Root | Cervical Radiculopathy at C7 Nerve Root
-
NCT04727866CompletedSpinal Cord Injuries | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level | Tetraplegia/Tetraparesis
-
NCT04075812CompletedSpinal Cord Injury at C4-C6 Level
-
NCT05803954CompletedCervical Radiculopathy | Disc Herniation | Cervical Radiculopathy at C5 Nerve Root | Cervical Radiculopathy at C6 Nerve Root | Cervical Radiculopathy at C7 Nerve Root
-
NCT03277521CompletedQuadriplegia/Tetraplegia
-
NCT02329652RecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level | Spinal Cord Injury Cervical | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level With Complete Lesion | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level With Incomplete Lesion
-
NCT01741389CompletedSpinal Cord Injured, Tetraplegia
-
NCT05423600Recruiting
-
NCT05638191RecruitingUpper Extremity Dysfunction | Cervical Spinal Cord Injury | Spinal Cord Injury | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level | SCI - Spinal Cord Injury | Upper Extremity Paralysis | Tetraplegia | Upper Extremity Paresis
Clinical Trials on motor imagery
-
NCT07002567Not yet recruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Spasticity | Motor Learning
-
NCT06343701RecruitingCerebral Palsy, Spastic
-
NCT07461688CompletedMotor Imagery Training | Virtual Reality | Resistance Training
-
NCT07516743RecruitingPregnancy-related Lumbopelvic Pain
-
NCT06299345Completed
-
NCT03959449CompletedAnalgesia | Exercise
-
NCT04290377Terminated
-
NCT07610889CompletedComplex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) | Shoulder Hand Syndrome