Snare-assisted POEM for Treatment of Esophageal Achalasia
Safety, Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of Snare-assisted POEM for Treatment of Esophageal Achalasia
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Guangdong
-
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510080
- First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age between 18-70 years
- Diagnosed as achalasia base on high resolution manometry, barium esophagram and Upper endoscopy
- Signed written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- ASA class > Ⅲ
- Previous endoscopic or surgical treatment for achalasia
- Esophageal malignancy
- Pregnant
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: snare group
snare-assisted POEM
|
POEM is performed by using a snare which is retracted into the sheath to expose the tip, leaving a 1-2mm length for operation.
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: conventional group
knife-assisted POEM
|
POEM is performed by using a conventional endoscopic knife.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical success rates
Time Frame: 12 months after treatment
|
Clinical success is defined as a post-POEM Eckardt score ≤3 without additional treatment (Eckardt AJ et al, Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011).
|
12 months after treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Procedure-related adverse events
Time Frame: baseline to 12 months after treatment
|
Adverse events are defined and graded according to the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy lexicon (Cotton PB et al, Gastrointest Endosc 2010).
Incidental findings of pneumoperitoneum, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pleural effusion on postoperative imaging, and subcutaneous emphysema were documented while not considered as adverse events.
|
baseline to 12 months after treatment
|
|
Procedure time
Time Frame: POEM procedure
|
Procedure time is measured from the start of submucosal injection until mucosal entry closure.
|
POEM procedure
|
|
The volume of intraoperative bleeding
Time Frame: POEM procedure
|
POEM procedure
|
|
|
The use of hemostatic forceps
Time Frame: POEM procedure
|
POEM procedure
|
|
|
Postoperative pain requiring the use of tramadol
Time Frame: Through hospital stay after procedure, an average of 2-7 days
|
Pain related to POEM procedure requiring the use of tramadol pain medication.
|
Through hospital stay after procedure, an average of 2-7 days
|
|
The length of postoperative hospital stay
Time Frame: Through hospital stay after procedure, an average of 2-7 daysc
|
Through hospital stay after procedure, an average of 2-7 daysc
|
|
|
Total hospital costs of treatment per participants
Time Frame: Through hospital stay after procedure, an average of 2-7 days
|
Through hospital stay after procedure, an average of 2-7 days
|
|
|
Eckardt score
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months and 12 months after treatment
|
The Eckardt score assesses the severity of achalasia symptoms by combining the sum of symptom frequency scores for dysphagia, regurgitation, and chest pain and a weight loss score.
Each component can be graded from 0 to 3 points.
The total range is 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms (Eckardt AJ et al, Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011).
|
baseline, 3 months and 12 months after treatment
|
|
Manometry parameters
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months after treatment
|
Manometry parameters include lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) on high resolution manometry.
|
baseline and 3 months after treatment
|
|
Maximum esophageal diameter on barium esophagram
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months after treatment
|
baseline and 3 months after treatment
|
|
|
Gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GerdQ) score
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months and 12 months after treatment
|
The GerdQ has been developed as a tool to facilitate the symptom-based diagnosis of GERD.
Scores ranging from 0 to 3 were applied for the four positive predictors (heartburn, regurgitation, sleep disturbance due to reflux symptoms and use of over-the-counter medications for reflux symptoms) and from 3 to 0 for two negative predictors (epigastric pain and nausea).
The GerdQ score was calculated as the sum of these scores, giving a total score ranging from 0 to 18.
A total GerdQ score >7 is considered indicative of significant GERD symptoms (Jones R et al, Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009).
|
baseline, 3 months and 12 months after treatment
|
|
Reflux esophagitis on post-POEM endoscopy
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment
|
The severity of reflux esophagitis is graded according to the Los Angeles classification (Armstrong D et al, Gastroenterology 1996).
|
3 months after treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Xiangbin Xing, MD, PhD, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 123 (Giresun University Scientific Research Project)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Esophageal Achalasia
-
NCT07181070RecruitingAchalasia | Indocyanine Green | Indocyanine Green (ICG) | Achalasia, Esophageal
-
NCT07496840RecruitingEsophageal Motility Disorders | Achalasia
-
NCT02606578TerminatedAchalasia | Esophageal Achalasia | Achalasia, Esophageal
-
NCT07451301Completed
-
NCT07287787Not yet recruiting
-
NCT06189859RecruitingAchalasia | Achalasia Cardia
-
NCT05729971CompletedAchalasia | Achalasia Cardia
-
NCT03186248Completed
-
NCT07167355Not yet recruiting
-
NCT06213662RecruitingDysphagia | Cricopharyngeal Achalasia
Clinical Trials on snare-assisted POEM
-
NCT01800656Completed
-
NCT06937047Not yet recruiting
-
NCT01742494UnknownEsophageal Achalasia
-
NCT07178821Not yet recruitingAchalasia, Esophageal | GERD (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease)
-
NCT04816292Not yet recruiting
-
NCT02036047CompletedPostpolypectomy Bleeding | Diminutive Colorectal Polyp | Cold Snare Polypectomy | Polypectomy Snare | Complete Resection Rate
-
NCT06097650CompletedHaemorrhage | Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
-
NCT03733756Unknown