Comparison of I-gel LMA, Classical LMA With a New Supraglottic Airway the Baska Mask® in Urological Surgery (BCIM)
Comparison of I-gel LMA, Classical LMA With a New Supraglottic Airway the Baska Mask®in Urological Surgery Regarding Their Efficacy and Safety
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The most used airway management strategies are different types of supraglottic airway devices (SAD) for transurethral resection of bladder and ureteroscopy in urological surgery . Classical laryngeal mask airway (LMA-C) and I-Gel SADs are being used already. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the performance of a new type of SAD the Baska Mask® with I-gel and LMA-C regarding their insertion times, durations, perioperative complications and effects on hemodynamic parameters, peak airway pressures (Paw) and airway plato pressures in urological surgery as well.
The main suggestion about the Baska Mask® is that it's the most appropriate airway device with high Paws. In high Paws, higher air leaks may occur from the sides of cuff and this causes hypoventilation. So the main aim of this study is to evaltuate three devices in terms of insertion and ventilation times, the "first attempt" success rates, the additional maneuvering requirements and complications developed after intervention.
The secondary objective of the study was to evaluate all three SADs in terms of airway pressures producing sufficient tidal volume and hemodynamical parameters.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- (ASA) 1-2-3 physical status scheduled for elective surgical procedure for transurethral resection of bladder and ureteroscopy.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Under the age of 18, history of hiatus hernia, gastroesophageal reflux, body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg m-2, ASA physical status 4 or over and patients who met the difficult intubation criteria.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: OTHER
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
- Masking: DOUBLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Classical LMA
Classical LMA insertion: LMA-C insertion was done in supine position and with a standard gel pillow with the patient's head on following anesthesia induction.
The insertion was verified with the manual ventilation of the patient and end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure waveform.
|
LMA-C will be placed into the patients airway following anesthesia induction.
The placement will be done as suggested in supine position with a standard gel pillow under patients head.
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: I-gel
I-gel LMA insertion: The I-gel LMA insertion was done in supine position and with a standard gel pillow with the patient's head on following anesthesia induction.
The insertion was verified with the manual ventilation of the patient and end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure waveform.
|
I-gel LMA placement will be done as suggested in supine position with a standard gel pillow under patients head.
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: The Baska Mask®
The Baska Mask® insertion: The Baska Mask® insertion was done in supine position and with a standard gel pillow with the patient's head on following anesthesia induction.
The insertion was verified with the manual ventilation of the patient and end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure waveform.
|
Baska Mask will be placed into the patients airway following anesthesia induction.
The placement will be done as suggested in supine position with a standard gel pillow under patients head.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Insertion times
Time Frame: Perioperative
|
It was evaluated that how many secs does it take to insert properly.
|
Perioperative
|
|
Ventilation times
Time Frame: Perioperative
|
It was evaluated that how many secs does it take to ventilate the patient.
|
Perioperative
|
|
First attemp success rates
Time Frame: Perioperative
|
In how many patients it was inserted at first attempt
|
Perioperative
|
|
The additional maneuvering
Time Frame: Perioperative
|
ıt was evaluated how many maneuvers needed to insert the device.
|
Perioperative
|
|
Airway related complications
Time Frame: Perioperative
|
Complications like Bloodstain of the mask, Dysphagia, Tongue injury, Lips injury, Teeth injury, Palate injury, Sore throat, Hoarseness, Desaturation , Laryngospasm, Regurgitation/aspiration were evaluated.
|
Perioperative
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Airway PAP and Plateau pressures
Time Frame: Perioperative
|
Both pressures were evaluated following device insertion and then in every 10 mins.
|
Perioperative
|
|
Haemodynamic parameters, heart rate bpm, systolic and diastolic arterial pressures mmHg
Time Frame: Perioperative
|
Preoperative and following device insertion all haemodynamic parameters were evaluated in every 10 mins.
|
Perioperative
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Asli Demir, Yuksek Ihtisas Research and Educational Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- LMA-Urological surgery
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Airway Management
-
NCT07590739Not yet recruitingDifficult Airway | Obesity Difficult Airway Airway Management
-
NCT07547943Not yet recruitingAirway Management | Difficult Airway
-
NCT07077317CompletedAirway Management | Difficult Airway | Difficult Airway Intubation
-
NCT02644837TerminatedAirway Management | Laryngeal Mask Airway
-
NCT07340346CompletedAirway Management | Difficult Airway | Obstetric Anesthesia
-
NCT07355608Not yet recruiting
-
NCT05967507Recruiting
-
NCT05647174Not yet recruitingAirway Management
-
NCT07577648Active, not recruitingAirway Management
-
NCT07365449Completed
Clinical Trials on LMA-C
-
NCT03115606CompletedIntubation Complication | Cervical Discopathy
-
NCT01876836UnknownProstate Hyperplasia | Bladder Tumour
-
NCT03432403Completed
-
NCT01960673Completedthe Influence of Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure and Sealing Between the Mask and Vocal Cord During Changing Patient's Head and Neck Position
-
NCT04045899CompletedProseal LMA vs Air-Q LMA vs Ambu AurGain LMA
-
NCT01909297CompletedAirway Complication of Anaesthesia
-
NCT01814306UnknownInadequate or Impaired Breathing Pattern or Ventilation
-
NCT00626951Completed
-
NCT02478983Completed