Efficacy of Betalactam Antibiotics in Prolonged Infusion Compared to Intermittent in Pediatric Patients With Sepsis

July 14, 2021 updated by: Yazmín Del Carmen Fuentes Pacheco, Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico

Efficacy and Safety of the Administration of Betalactam Antibiotics in Continuous or Extended Infusion Compared to Intermittent Infusion in Patients With Sepsis in Two Pediatric Third-level Care Hospitals

This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of the administration of betalactam antibiotics in prolonged infusion compared to intermittent infusion in children with sepsis. Half of participants will receive piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem or meropenem in continuous or extended infusion, while the other half will receive piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem or meropenem in intermittent infusion.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Sepsis is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalised patients globally. Betalactams are time-dependent antibiotics, and so, the duration of time for which the free drug plasma concentration remains above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT > MIC) is the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index associated with bacterial killing and clinical improvement. Numerous studies have demonstrated that continuous infusion (infusion in 24 hours) and extended infusion (through prolonging the infusion time to greater than 3 hours) allows the maintenance of concentrations above the MIC for a longer period of time within the dosing interval (30 minute or 1 hour), and so, capitalises on the pharmacodynamic properties of betalactams and maximises bacterial killing, therefore potentially improving clinical outcomes. In adult patients, the several studies suggest that prolonged infusion may offer clinical benefits and significant reduction in mortality without increasing the risk of toxicity, however, there is limited information about these dosing strategies in pediatric patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
426

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Mexico
    • Distrito Federal
      • Mexico, Distrito Federal, Mexico, 06720
        • Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gomez
      • Mexico, Distrito Federal, Mexico, 06720
        • Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 13 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with sepsis, who have been evaluated by an infectious physician and are candidates to receive piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem or meropenem as empiric treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a history of allergy to one or more of the proposed antibiotics.
  • Patients with chronic kidney disease or acute renal failure.
  • Patients with acute liver failure of any cause.
  • Patients in palliative or supportive care only.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Intermittent Piperacillin/tazobactam
Piperacillin/tazobactam 300mg/kg/day, divided into 4 doses/day, diluted in 5% glucose solution, at a concentration of 50mg/ml, to be administered in 30 minutes infusion every 6 hours.
Drug: Intermittent Piperacillin/tazobactam
Piperacillin/tazobactam administered in 30 minutes infusion.
Other Names:
  • Intermittent Infusion of Piperacillin/tazobactam
  • PiSA
Experimental: Continuous Piperacillin/tazobactam
Piperacillin/tazobactam initial doses 75mg/kg in 30 minutes infusion, immediately thereafter continue 300mg/kg/day, diluted in 5% glucose solution, at a concentration of 50mg/ml, to be administered in 24 hours infusion every 24 hours, as determined by antibiotic stability at room temperature.
Drug: Continuous Piperacillin/tazobactam
Piperacillin/tazobactam administered in 24 hours infusion.
Other Names:
  • PiSA
  • Continuous Infusion of Piperacillin/tazobactam
Active Comparator: Intermittent Imipenem
Imipenem 80mg/kg/day, divided into 4 doses/day, diluted in 0.9% saline solution, at a concentration of 7mg/ml, to be administered in 60 minutes infusion every 6 hours.
Drug: Intermittent Imipenem
Imipenem administered in 60 minutes infusion.
Other Names:
  • PiSA
  • Intermittent Infusion of Imipenem
Experimental: Extended Imipenem
Imipenem initial doses 20mg/kg in 60 minutes infusion, immediately thereafter continue 80mg/kg/day, divided into 4 doses/day, diluted in 0.9% saline solution, at a concentration of 7mg/ml, to be administered in 6 hours infusion every 6 hours, as determined by antibiotic stability at room temperature.
Drug: Extended Imipenem
Imipenem administered in 6 hours infusion.
Other Names:
  • PiSA
  • Extended Infusion of Imipenem
Active Comparator: Intermittent Meropenem
Meropenem 100mg/kg/day, divided into 3 doses/day, diluted in 0.9% saline solution, at a concentration of 7mg/ml, to be administered in 60 minutes every 8 hours.
Drug: Intermittent Meropenem
Meropenem administered in 60 minutes infusion.
Other Names:
  • Intermittent Infusion of Meropenem
  • Kener
  • Merrem, AstraZeneca
Experimental: Extended Meropenem
Meropenem initial doses 35mg/kg in 60 minutes infusion, immediately thereafter continue 100mg/kg/day, divided into 3 doses/day, diluted in 0.9% saline solution at a concentration of 7mg/ml, to be administered in 8 hours infusion every 8 hours, as determined by antibiotic stability at room temperature.
Drug: Extended Meropenem
Meropenem administered in 8 hours infusion.
Other Names:
  • Kener
  • Merrem, AstraZeneca
  • Extended Infusion of Meropenem

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Clinical Response
Time Frame: Number of participants with clinical response at 14 days after antibiotic cessation, up to an average of 28 days or the day of your discharge if this occurred before 14 days after antibiotic cessation.

Resolution. Disappearance of all signs and symptoms related to the infection.

Failure. Insufficient lessening of the signs and symptoms of infection to qualify as improvement, including death or indeterminate (no evaluation possible, for any reason).
Number of participants with clinical response at 14 days after antibiotic cessation, up to an average of 28 days or the day of your discharge if this occurred before 14 days after antibiotic cessation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: Number of participants with adverse events evaluated by an physician at the time of administration of antibiotics, up to an average to 24 hours after the study drug cessation.
Any harmful, undesirable, potentially serious and life threatening effects occurring during or after administration of the antibiotics proposed in this study (piperacillin / tazobactam, imipenem or meropenem), was evaluated as: none or adverse event classified according to the intensity of the clinical manifestation (severity) as: mild, moderate or severe and for each antibiotic.
Number of participants with adverse events evaluated by an physician at the time of administration of antibiotics, up to an average to 24 hours after the study drug cessation.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gomez
Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad del Bajio

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Yazmín del Carmen Fuentes, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 26, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 11, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 13, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 14, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2016-785-099

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Identified individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available within six months of study completion

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on Intermittent Piperacillin/tazobactam

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings