The Safety and Efficacy Test of Nutri-PEITC Jelly in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

February 13, 2023 updated by: Dental Innovation Foundation Under Royal Patronage
This triple-blinded randomized placebo control trial aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of Nutri-PEITC jelly, a functional food, in head and neck cancer patients. The primary outcome measure includes adverse events, health-related quality of life, tumor response and progression-free survival. The secondary outcome includes serum p53 and cytochrome C levels and functional status.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Previously, Nutri-jelly, a novel edible nutritious gel for patients with chewing and swallowing difficulties, was shown to be effective in improving the quality of life of head and neck cancer patients. Recently, Nutri-PEITC jelly is recently developed by addition of Phenethyl Isothiocyanate (PEITC), a phytochemical compound with chemopreventive action in animal bearing oral cancer. It intends to be a functional food for cancer survivor. The dose of PEITC in Nutri-jelly was based on safe and effective dose determined in animal studies. Furthermore, Nutri-PEITC jelly was proven safe in healthy volunteers who daily consumes for a consecutive month with no serious adverse events. The purpose of this study is to determine safety and efficacy of Nutri-jelly with PEITC in head and neck cancer patients.

independent variable: continuous Nutri -jelly with PEITC intake dependent variable (outcome): adverse effects, health-related quality of life score, tumor response, progression-free survival, serum p53 and cytochrome C levels and functional status

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
96

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Thailand
      • Lopburi, Thailand, 15000
        • Lopburi Cancer Hospital
      • Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand, 30000
        • Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital
      • Pathum Thani, Thailand, 12110
        • Maha Vajiralongkorn Thanyaburi Hospital
    • Bangkok
      • Bankok, Bangkok, Thailand
        • National Cancer Institute
    • Chonburi
      • Cholburi, Chonburi, Thailand, 20000
        • Chonburi Cancer Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma in areas of lip, oral cavity, oropharynx and hypopharynx, who receive only palliative care or deny definitive treatment
  2. Finished radiotherapy or/and chemotherapy for at least one month
  3. Has at least one measurable target lesion
  4. Baseline KPS ≥ 40% or ECOG 0-3
  5. Blood tests are in acceptable ranges (neutrophils ≥ 1.5 x 109/L, platelets ≥ 100 x 109/L; Hb ≥ 9.0 g/dL), renal function (clearance creatinine using the CKD-EPI formula (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology group) ≥50 mL/min) and hepatic function (SGOT , SGPT, serum bilirubin ≤ 1.5 of upper limits of normal
  6. Able to take the intervention (through mouth or NG tube) without aspiration
  7. Able to communicate and consent to the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cannot come back for the follow-up visits
  2. Receive or had received N-acetylcysteine during the intervention
  3. Has systemic diseases that might interfere with the results
  4. Chronic kidney disease that requires dialysis
  5. Increased risk of aspiration pneumonia
  6. Pregnancy or lactation
  7. Untreated infectious diseases

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Nutri-jelly with PEITC
Continuous intake of 200 g Nutri-jelly with 20 mg PEITC per day, five days per week for 3 months.
Dietary supplement: Nutri-jelly with PEITC
Nutri-jelly with PEITC resulted from an addition of tested amount of PEITC, which was shown in animal model to delay cancer growth, into Nutri-jelly.
Placebo Comparator: Nutri-jelly
Continuous intake of 200 g Nutri-jelly per day, five days per week for 3 months.
Dietary supplement: Nutri-jelly
Nutri-jelly is an edible nutritious gel for patients with chewing and swallowing difficulties. One milligram of Nutri-jelly contains approximately 1 kcal.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events
Time Frame: 1 month and 3 months after receiving intervention
Evaluation of adverse events by physical examination, blood tests, and interviewing the subjects
1 month and 3 months after receiving intervention
Changes in Health-related quality of life score compared to baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month and 3 months after receiving intervention
Evaluation of Health-related quality of life by using questionnaire FACT-HN
Baseline, 1 month and 3 months after receiving intervention
Changes in Tumor response compared to baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months after receiving intervention
Evaluation of tumor response following RECIST criteria at 1 month and 3 months
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months after receiving intervention
Progression-free survival time
Time Frame: The time of the intervention until any signs or symptoms of progressive disease be recorded.
The length of time during the intervention that the participant lives with stable disease
The time of the intervention until any signs or symptoms of progressive disease be recorded.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serum p53 level
Time Frame: 1 month and 3 months after receiving intervention
Level of both wild type and mutant p53 in serum
1 month and 3 months after receiving intervention
Serum cytochrome C level
Time Frame: 1 month and 3 months after receiving intervention
Level of cytochrome C in serum
1 month and 3 months after receiving intervention
Changes in Functional status
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month and 3 months after receiving intervention
Evaluation of functional status using KPS (Karnofsky Performance Score) score
Baseline, 1 month and 3 months after receiving intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Dental Innovation Foundation Under Royal Patronage

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Mahidol University
Ministry of Health, Thailand
Srinakharinwirot University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 25, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 25, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 27, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 13, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DIF-04

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Nutri-jelly with PEITC

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings