Using Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) as an Intervention Strategy for Drivers With Parkinson's Disease

February 29, 2024 updated by: Liliana Alvarez Jaramillo, Western University, Canada
Parkinson's disease (PD) impacts an individual's fitness to drive in a number of ways that increase the crash risk in this population. Current vehicle automation technologies are available, that although designed for the general public, may help drivers with PD stay on the roads longer and safer than currently possible. Using a driving simulator (a safe and cost-effective alternative with no impact on licensing for participants), this study will investigate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of utilizing in-vehicle technology (i.e., a simulated lane change assistance system) to address critical driving errors in individuals with mild to moderate Parkinson's disease.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
22

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Liliana Alvarez, PhD
  • Phone Number: 88957 5196612111
  • Email: lalvare2@uwo.ca

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6G1H1
        • University of Western Ontario

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants must be 21 years of age or older (as a feasibility study, this study will provide the opportunity to participate to those diagnosed with early onset PD)
  • Have been diagnosed with Parkinson's disease by a neurologist or movement disorder specialist
  • Currently hold a valid G driver's license
  • Meet provincial visual acuity (20/50 binocular) and visual field (120 continuous along the horizontal meridian with both eyes examined together) requirements for driving
  • Be proficient in English reading and speaking (self-reported).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have any other neurological or psychiatric conditions that would interfere with full participation in the study
  • Be taking psychotropic medication(s) that affect their mental and/or physical functioning

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention
Participants will complete a standardized battery of paper and pencil and computer tests. Following these tests, participants will complete a baseline simulator driving assessment without any form of assistive technology. We will employ a CDS-200 driving simulator (DriveSafety Inc., Salt Lake City, UT). A trained blinded evaluator will observe the recorded drive and score the drive. After the baseline assessment, participants will engage in 3 intervention sessions (lasting 30 minutes each). During these sessions, the lane change assistance system will be introduced and participants will be taught how to use it. After the 3 sessions, participants will participate in a post-test, similar to the baseline assessment but with a different route within the simulated world. They will drive this new route with the assistive technology. One to two weeks after the post-test, participants will be invited to participate in a follow-up assessment (battery of tests and simulator assessment).
Device: Lane change assistance system
This study will investigate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a 6-session lane change ADAS-intervention on the simulated driving performance of individuals with mild to moderate PD. We anticipate that the use of lane change assist technology will decrease the number of driving errors in individuals with PD. As this is a feasibility study, we will evaluate: -recruitment capability and sample characteristics - data collection methods, procedures, and outcome measures - acceptability and suitability of the lane change assist technology intervention - preliminary efficacy The outcomes of this study will inform the design of a larger study, should such large-scale study be warranted.
Active Comparator: Control
Participants will complete a standardized battery of paper and pencil and computer tests. Following these tests, participants will complete a baseline simulator driving assessment without any form of assistive technology. We will employ a CDS-200 driving simulator (DriveSafety Inc., Salt Lake City, UT). A trained blinded evaluator will observe the recorded drive and score the drive. After the baseline assessment, participants will engage in 3 intervention sessions (lasting 30 minutes each). During these sessions, participants will drive the scenario and receive feedback from a trained evaluator regarding their live performance. No lane change assistance system will be utilized. After the 3 sessions, participants will participate in a post-test, similar to the baseline assessment but with a different route within the simulated world.
Behavioral: Active Control
Participants will practice their driving on a driving simulator with feedback form a trained interventionist.
Other Names:
  • Simulator practice

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in number of lane maintenance errors from baseline to post-test 1(4 weeks) and post-test 2 (6 weeks)
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks
Refers to the lateral position of the vehicle in the lane.
Baseline, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks
Change in number of visual scanning errors from baseline to post-test 1(4 weeks) and post-test 2 (6 weeks)
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks
Visual scanning is defined as eye movement and turning of the neck and head (e.g. glances, look sideways at an intersection, look at mirrors) to detect oncoming objects
Baseline, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks
Change in number of signalling errors from baseline to post-test 1(4 weeks) and post-test 2 (6 weeks)
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks
Refers to the proper use of turning signals during lane changes
Baseline, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Western University, Canada

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Liliana Alvarez, PhD, Western University, Canada

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 19, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 22, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 4, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 29, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 109272

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Lane change assistance system

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings