The Diagnostic Performance of BMO-MRW and RNFL Thickness and Their Combinational Index Using Artificial Neural Network

August 24, 2017 updated by: Pusan National University Hospital

The Comparison of Bruch's Membrane Opening-minimum Rim Width and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and Their Combinational Index Using Artificial Neural Network

This study evaluates the relationship between BMO-MRW and RNFL thickness measured by OCT. SD-OCT exam will be performed to all patients in this study.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

spectral domain optical coherence tomography, SD-OCT, (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) is a widely used commercial device in ophthalmology field. For a long time, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness was measured with OCT to detect and follow up glaucoma patients. Bruch's membrane opening - minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) is relatively new parameter which measures the minimum distance between Bruch's membrane opening to internal limiting membrane (ILM). BMO-MRW,a new parameter, is known to have better diagnostic performance than RNFL thickness and recently, many researches has been performed on this new parameter. SD-OCT can measure RNFL thickness and BMO-MRW at the same time. The test procedure is not different from RNFL thickness measurement but only software implemented in OCT device calculates BMO-MRW as well as RNFL thickness. The investigators are going to compare these two parameters and find out the relationship between two parameters.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
402

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The patients who visited Pusan National University Hospital glaucoma clinic.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years with a clear cornea and clear ocular media
  • BCVA ≥ 20/40
  • Refractive error within ± 6.0 diopters (D) of 0 and astigmatism ± 3.0 D of 0

Exclusion Criteria:

  • uveitis
  • secondary glaucoma
  • corneal abnormalities
  • non-glaucomatous optic neuropathies
  • previous trauma
  • ocular surgery or laser treatment
  • any other eye disease except glaucoma.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Normal subject
Measure BMO-MRW and RNFL with SD-OCT. If the BMO-MRW and RNFL is within the normal range and those with no history of ocular disease, an intraocular pressure < 21 mmHg, an absence of glaucomatous optic disc appearance, and a normal visual field, they will be classified into normal group.
Diagnostic test: SD-OCT
SD-OCT was performed to all subjects to measure BMO-MRW and RNFL thickness by trained glaucoma specialist. It takes about 5 to 10 minutes. The foveal location was manually detected with a live B-scan, followed by defining BMO center. A radial pattern containing 24 angular, equidistant, high-resolution 15° B-scans centered on the BMO was used to compute the neuroretinal rim parameters. The BMO points and ILM were identified and marked in each B-scan with automated software (Glaucoma Module Premium Edition, version 6.0; Heidelberg Engineering). After radial scan completed, 3 consecutive circumpapillary B-scans were followed to measure RNFL thickness at diameter of 3.5, 4.1 and 4.7mm. BMO-MRW and RNFL thickness was automatically computed globally and sectorally.
Glaucoma patients
Measure BMO-MRW and RNFL with SD-OCT. If the BMO-MRW and RNFL is below the normal range and those with glaucomatous optic disc and two consecutive abnormal visual field test results with open angles on gonioscopy, glaucomatous optic neuropathy, RNFL defects congruent with visual field defects, they will be classified into glaucoma patients.
Diagnostic test: SD-OCT
SD-OCT was performed to all subjects to measure BMO-MRW and RNFL thickness by trained glaucoma specialist. It takes about 5 to 10 minutes. The foveal location was manually detected with a live B-scan, followed by defining BMO center. A radial pattern containing 24 angular, equidistant, high-resolution 15° B-scans centered on the BMO was used to compute the neuroretinal rim parameters. The BMO points and ILM were identified and marked in each B-scan with automated software (Glaucoma Module Premium Edition, version 6.0; Heidelberg Engineering). After radial scan completed, 3 consecutive circumpapillary B-scans were followed to measure RNFL thickness at diameter of 3.5, 4.1 and 4.7mm. BMO-MRW and RNFL thickness was automatically computed globally and sectorally.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bruch's membrane opening - minimum rim width (BMO-MRW)
Time Frame: 5~10 minutes
SD-OCT will be performed to the patients to measure BMO-MRW by trained glaucoma specialist.
5~10 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness
Time Frame: 5~10 minutes
SD-OCT will be performed to the patients to measure RNFL thickness. This is measured at the same time as BMO-MRW, not separately.
5~10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Pusan National University Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jiwoong Lee, M.D., Ph.D, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 17, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 22, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 25, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 24, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1510-001-034

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participants data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be shared.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available within 12 months after study published.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data access requests will be reviewed by an external independent review panel (PNUH IRB) and if they approve, data will be provided.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glaucoma

Clinical Trials on SD-OCT

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings